Profit Trickler

[mogul397]

First real money session on Live Auto-Roulette Le Partage

+5.5 in 51 spins.  That is OK. No sweat - just played it as described with no deviation

There were three 0's occurred  - only one of which happened on a bet spin.
The 0 can always be an unwelcome hindrance or a pest; unless you cover it as insurance - I got half my stake back there - which is some consolation (but to avoid completely maybe play on NoZero Roulette or Baccarat?)

Since there are always regular bets on each new line recorded you don't get to wait for too long without a bet; so you don't get timed out or kicked off from the app like when I tried with some other 'waiting' systems - that is good!

This one I play also has acceptable stakes in the range £0.10 to £4000 for an EC bet - which is also nice.

A.

Atlantis,

When I was reviewing the method, I was trying to come up with a metric for how
many units per spin it was making. Cause watching the 5 spins kind of flies by.
This example looks like 1 unit per 10 spins.

But also to speak to the speed and all, yes, it is generally an "easy play".
Easy on the nerves. But a bit sorry to say, referring to RG's comment about the
penny units on 1,3,9,27.  What's the point? I like to feel like I'm going to
win something. I don't play quarter machines like GLC, that make it all easier.
Or Bleep, playing at the $1 level witn NLE.

Which leads to another question. Why don't you look at playing all 3 EC's
at the same time? There's certainly plenty of time to track it?

Mogul

[atlantis]

Hi Mogul,

Just as A-CD could be applied to the different dozens (and also remember the columns too) to get more bets so can this EC method be applied to other than H/L in my examples... so Yes. I think will be worth looking at tracking all 3 EC's.
Thanks,
A

[bleep24]

I agree that what is needed is more betting opportunities.   In my testing up to now this has proved to be very stable.  Using H/L - O/E alternating I would put winning at less that 1 unit per 10 spins so unless you are using 1 unit = $10/$20/$30 or whatever then it is a steady but low winning system.

I will try all 3 EC`s next.  Do not know about Dozens/Columns but I think that this was covered recently and I cannot remember outcome.  Yes, a bit like ABCD method.

Bleep

[bleep24]

BTW.  I am using my fave. prog:    +1/-1   using 1 1 2 you are only winning on first win then breaking even.  I have back tested some of the spin sequences in this thread and +1/-1 is fine (and still no sweat due to its short losing runs)


Brian

[atlantis]

Thx Brian,

I will also try out the +1/-1.

I found tracking all 3 EC's on the autowheel  too much to handle because of short time between spins - but 2 EC's fine. And maybe one side can compensate for a loser on the other side much of the time. Separate progressions for each side. Might reach the target quicker too. BTW, still winning for me too, brian.
Will try again tomorrow.

A.

[mogul397]

Hi Mogul,

Just as A-CD could be applied to the different dozens (and also remember the columns too) to get more bets so can this EC method be applied to other than H/L in my examples... so Yes. I think will be worth looking at tracking all 3 EC's.
Thanks,
A

What's A-CD?

[mogul397]

Thx Brian,

I will also try out the +1/-1.

I found tracking all 3 EC's on the autowheel  too much to handle because of short time between spins - but 2 EC's fine. And maybe one side can compensate for a loser on the other side much of the time. Separate progressions for each side. Might reach the target quicker too. BTW, still winning for me too, brian.
Will try again tomorrow.

A.

How long between spins?

[bleep24]

I only play on-line `Live` dealer.    Tracking and placing bets on all 3 EC`s is a non starter due to the short betting window.

I am using H/L and O/E.  Still holding up.  When there is a loss it is generally just one.  Very most that I have seen is 3.   If you are using 1 1 2 then a loss is not going to put you in the poor house.

[mogul397]

SO far when I pick up some date I get bets and hits every
row of 5. Haven't done much, but the hit rate is very good.

I'm a little confused about the best betting progression, but waiting for
Bleeps' feedback doing all the EC's and +/1.

On the one hand I wonder why the trickler method stops after one
win, and also lets 3 losses go. Not trying to muddy the waters, just
thinking and digesting.

[mogul397]

Real data I got today.  Did it on red and black.

44 spins, +7. No speed bumps.  4 out of the 7 were 1st spin.

I have some time this weekend.

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul,
Have you found something at last that you like!!!!!   

I have been playing a session every day with this.  (Forty or so spins)    Have won every one.  Average win 4/5 units.  I am NOT using one E/C.  Using matrix in lines of 6.    H/L - O/E - H/L - O/E - H/L - O/E         

Most series you do win on first.   I am only doing wait for 2 and bet opposite (vertically)   +1/-1   Hardly gets out of starting gate betting 1 unit

There are a few variations in this thread and when I get more time I will have a go with them.

Good luck,     Brian

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul,

Were you `doing` bet opposite/or same if 2.  If lost next time round (and still needing this bet for a win) bet opposite to the 3?  Are you using a 6 matrix?      I am using a 6 and only betting after 2`s to be different. (Less betting opps. but I think that I  will have to change that)

I have checked a couple of my results and they do come out winners but just using one EC is not as stable, but still winning.

Each to their own (with tweaks, bells and knobs on)                This system certainly has a lot going for it.   
Calls for a couple (or two) bottles of `Newkey Broon Ale`       

Cheers,  Brian

[DoctorSudoku]

If it's $1 bets. What's 1 3 9 27

Peanuts


The doc brings this up a few times a week. But it's perspective

Who is it? What's their bankroll? What unit size are they using? These are questions people should ask before criticizing someone's progression play

It may be a $1 betting unit, but when you lose a double dozen or double column 1 3 9 27 progression sequence, you are down $80.

Yes, $80 may not be a lot of money, but the problem is that in order to recover those $80, you will have to win 80 series (at any stage of a 1 3 9 27 progression).

Remember, at whichever stage you win, you are just making $1.

Therein lies the problem: if you lose even one  such 1 3 9 27 sequence (total loss = 80 units), it will take you 80 series to recover that amount.

You cannot trivialize the above problem, even if your betting unit is only $1.

[atlantis]

Hi Mogul,

A-CD is my other topic "Anti-Clockwise Dozens" - which could also be applied to the Columns too; in which case it would be "ACDC"!!

LoL

On the LIVE autowheel I have same thing as bleep; not quite enough time window to "comfortably" work out and place the stakes and bets without feeling rushed or prone to error - but 2 EC seem Ok. I chose H/L and R/B.

Progression: could use brian's MO with the +1/-1 or maybe something milder like a string that move forward and back on; something like...  11223345.... or similar...?
I am using lines of 5 results and not 6.

The stop at 3 L rule until next line was simply my way dealing with what might possibly be the manifestation of the dreaded long losing string that *could* occur - So rather than continuing to follow a LLR, I stop before it gets too bad and wait to try again on the very next line either FOR vertical match or AGAINST vertical match as the method dictates.

A.

[atlantis]

Brian wrote:

Are you using a 6 matrix?      I am using a 6 and only betting after 2`s to be different. (Less betting opps. but I think that I  will have to change that)

Lines of 5 results: this way you get a majority decision either 3 or more repeats or 3 or more non-repeats. This gives you your trigger selection for betting on the opposite for the next line... If a line of 6 you can get a DRAW 3 of one; 3 of the other so no clear decision there.

Regards,
A.