Profit Trickler

[atlantis]

This thing has two places where there is a long string. Counted as
losses. They are not valid triggers for 4-5-6 in a row.....

Yes - betting against vert trebles or for vert trebles in matrix can work. All that has been tried before in other topics over different widths etc.
For instance take Lanky's Grail Method...
Profit Trickler Plus also uses grid - but different trigger methodology.
A.

[nottophammer]

a little ?, how long is a piece of string, is the answer unknown, or does math have an answer?

[nottophammer]

well whilst i await the answer, heres why i ask, here are 60 #'s posted by a member


Do we have an average for the length a e/c can repeat, perhaps the average would be 3 spins, or maybe 6 spins.

Would this average prefer a certain wide Matrix, like Bleep likes a 6 wide, but would a 3 wide be any better.

[mogul397]

Forum member called The Law

And when you "lay down thelaw", you say something
bad about him......

[mogul397]

Yes - betting against vert trebles or for vert trebles in matrix can work. All that has been tried before in other topics over different widths etc.
For instance take Lanky's Grail Method...
Profit Trickler Plus also uses grid - but different trigger methodology.
A.

I think that the trickler has proved it's worth.  Wins after
wins, after wins.

I was just doing my job as the "thread killer". It just happens. I test
something once and a chink shows up.

Not sure what it is, but I think that it needs a session stop loss.
That's all.

[mogul397]

a little ?, how long is a piece of string, is the answer unknown, or does math have an answer?

"How much wood would a wood chuck chuck, if a wood chuck could
chuck wood?"

"If a wood chuck could chuck would, he'd chuck as much wood as a
wood chuck could".

[777]

Tested 524 spins Wiesbaden H/L. came out with +37 u

using 1-2-4

max in a row 9L

maybe follow the trend is better than going against it. good tweak

[RouletteGhost]

Hey 777

You played 1 2 4 and if lost all 3 went back to one unit?

[atlantis]

Do we have an average for the length a e/c can repeat, perhaps the average would be 3 spins, or maybe 6 spins.

Would this average prefer a certain wide Matrix, like Bleep likes a 6 wide, but would a 3 wide be any better.

Interesting stuff, Notto.

I test something once and a chink shows up.
Not sure what it is, but I think that it needs a session stop loss.
That's all.

Hi mogul - I think you're right here... A piece of the puzzle is still missing; How to deal with continued betting losses is very important. It's sure to happen sometime. Need to avoid/stop/handle the longer losing betting strings that can and will occur.
Most times it will be OK - but have to figure something out. One way is to simply adjust the +1/-1 progression. It may be too risky to stick with that and I am sure a much, much milder form of rising bets can be used instead??
Well that is clearly one option.
And I didn't try the guetting yet too!
Thanks.
A.

[bleep24]

I think that we can no longer see the wood for the trees in this thread.  Maybe we need a wood chucker!

Seriously, are we over complicating things here and should go back to Atlantis`s original post.  No one likes losses but we cannot factor in every eventuality otherwise there will be nothing left.

I have just played another session and +14.   My main problem is recording and getting bets on in time but that is the nature of online roulette betting.

I am going back to NLE2  (3 same becoming 4) as it is much easier to play but I will keep an eye on Profit Trickler as it certainly has merit.

Bleep

[777]

Hey 777

You played 1 2 4 and if lost all 3 went back to one unit?

thats right

[nottophammer]

And when you "lay down thelaw", you say something
bad about him......

nope The law is usually right, FB comes out a winner. He said it in devil street, guess the law is spot on 

[nottophammer]

Looking thru the trees, 2 the same, bet change, Flat Bet.

[RouletteGhost]

In the past I have read people playing a three step Marty if lose all 3 steps revert back to one unit

[mogul397]

Interesting stuff, Notto.

Hi mogul - I think you're right here... A piece of the puzzle is still missing; How to deal with continued betting losses is very important. It's sure to happen sometime. Need to avoid/stop/handle the longer losing betting strings that can and will occur.
Most times it will be OK - but have to figure something out. One way is to simply adjust the +1/-1 progression. It may be too risky to stick with that and I am sure a much, much milder form of rising bets can be used instead??
Well that is clearly one option.
And I didn't try the guetting yet too!
Thanks.
A.

There's something about betting for 3 losses and only 1 win that
makes me scratch my head.  Many of the wins come in the first
2 bets