I don't support anyone with any system unless it's mine.

[iceman1313]

Hi GLC

I start where I show it here. But you can start it where you did also. All seems right You stop at +4  YOU MUST REMEMBER ALL THE RULES.

b
r     -1
b     -2
r     -3     -1
r     -2
r     -1     -2   
r      0     
b    -1     -1      +1                         
b     0     
b    +1    -2     
r      0     
r     +1    -1       +2                         
r     +2   
b    +1     0     
b    +2
b    +3    -1        +3
b    +4
r     +3     0             
b    +2     
b    +3     +1       +2
0    +2
r     +1      0                               
b      0     
r     -1      -1       +1
b    -2     
r    -3      -2     
r    -2
r    -1      -3         +0
b    -2     
b    -1     -2     
b     0     
b    +1     -3        +1
r      0     
r     +1     -2             
b     0 
b     +1    -1        +0
r      0
r      +1    0     


The iceman1313   

[ZigZag]

Hello Iceman

I thought i would have a little test. Paddypower slingshot

B
R  - 1
R  - 0
B  - 1    + 1
B  - 0
R  - 1    + 2
B  - 2
B  - 1    + 1            W + 1
B  - 0   
B  +1    - 0
R  - 0
R  +1    + 1            W + 2

Can you tell me if this is ok? I had to stop at + 2 becuse it was late zzzzz

Thanks 

[Big EZ]

Iceman....

I have a question for you. From all the testing that I have done so far, it looks to me like the only thing that gets to this method is repeats of colors or whatever other even chance you are using . Am I correct with that deduction?

Here is an example....
r
b  -1
r   -2
b  -3    -1
b  -2
r   -3      0
r   -2
r   -1     -1
r    0
r    1     -2
r    2
r    3     -3


I am wondering if this is where other dimensions come into play. Or is this just where you suck it up and take the -8unit loss? 

[ZigZag]

Hi Iceman

I had 6 sessions today. I didnt look to end at + 4 as i just wanted to get used to playing correctly

Session 1  -0       Session 1 and 2 i got off to bad start and made 1 or 2 mistakes so i just
Session 2  -0       aim to get back to evens
Session 3 +2
Session 4 +1
Session 5 +2
Session 6 +1

Now what i dont understand is how to record the zeros. I had double zero and didnt know how to record it on paper 

Thanks 

[iceman1313]

Hi ZigZag

Good question's

Answer
You don't right it down. When you go to +4 stop . Your total will then be + 3 only because of the 0 that hit you. Never try to go to +5 the deviation would be too high.

Your Friend

The Iceman1313

[Tomla021]

ive tested 800 spins and it stayed a bit like 20 units to the good for me---hey nothing wrong with that....will test more as im on vacation (testing is better by the pool-lol)

[iceman1313]

TO ALL HERE

Please show your results if they are bad. I need to check it out.

If you have went over 40 spins it will most likely did something work. Thank You never ever do 800 spins at once .or even 100 m99% of the time.

Like this

B
B + 1
B + 2
B  +3     -1
R  +2
R  +3  - +0
R  +4
R  +5     -1


The iceman1313

[iceman1313]

Hi ll l ll l lll ll

Hi my friend .Sorry I had to take your post down. I did Explain why. He didn't test the right way.

Here are the rules again . It's rare to even to get to - 8

-4  go back to - 2 then stop and change wheel Just take the lost . change wheel
- 5 go back to  -3 then stop and change wheel Just take the lost  .change wheel
-6  go back to - 4 then stop and change wheel Just take the lost  .change wheel
-7  go back to - 4 then stop and change wheel Just take the lost.  change wheel
- 8  STOP

The MOST important thing is to CHANGE WHEELS or RE-SET

You can stop any where  you want.

Your friend

The iceman1313

[iceman1313]

Hi Everyone

I can't say who this is because it came in a P.M. I have to respect that person.

thanks for your method.  It makes sense and I have just tested 7 more sessions and I finished at +4 on all of them except 1.

The iceman1313

[iceman1313]

Hi  everyone

I clean up some of the posts  so my friend can post his results without ant mistakes. We were at 12  win lost 12 so I think that was a good place to start testing with no mistakes.

Now he can post new results slow this time with no mistakes.If he does it right he should be up over 50 chips in a very small amount of time.


The iceman1313

[iceman1313]

Hi vundarosa

The reason was just too many mistake's were done on the results I know I didn't lose at all . But that's not the point that the house couldn't beat me. I just want the test to be 100% right.

That is only fair to the people that read my post.

The iceman1313

[iceman1313]

Hi chrisbis

You are right the words were of. I been at this and my program that i'n working on over 24 hrs
And typing in the dark.

I made the rules up and made posts how to play. I think the best way now is leave the readers alone and let them have fun with it.

The system will speak for itself.If never lost and I did post that it was tested with 3,000 shoes in Baccarat and was ahead $300,000.00 . And I also posted what people said about this system is the best in the 21st century.and much more.

I really have to get back to the big games and my programming .I will keep one of my computers on here most of the time to answer questions

Your friend

The iceman1313

 

[Twisteruk]

Iceman please read the notes in CC with regard to this Thread.

Please DO NOT delete this post as it advises other members too


Thanks

Admin

[iceman1313]

Hi Everyone
Nice place here where you can discuss what is going on with the post in the main posts are posted.
I believe you need to know my true intention why I’m here and the reason why I clean up some of the post by deleting some of them. I posted many times telling people over and over that I really want to see the bad results .Not many people would even think of doing that. But I had asked many times.
As you see I pointed out a mistake and the person made the mistake and never got though the 2nd session before he did. I saw that right away.
Most people rush though so fast for two reasons one is to ensure he wants the people to see that this system fails for his own reason.
The other reason he wants to see if the system is good enough to make himself a paycheck so he will rush though it and make many mistakes.
I had chosen the first reason sorry to say. One of his first statement I notice he sais he went and did dimension # 1  and dimension # 2 and dimension # 3.they all failed This can’t happen because if 1 of the dimension  goes bad the other dimensions will pick it up.. That is why I invented the dimension .If he really did all 3 dimensions he would have know that. That was the clue his post was to trash what I worked so hard for. I answered all question and I had even to try many times to help people when they didn’t understand the system. I myself couldn’t do the entire dimension in the time he did it live here. So I new all was false.
Also when you clean things up that are just words mean nothing to me. But it you show proof I’m all ears and would delete all post that refuse to post the reason behind their thoughts. As you all know you can post anything to trash people with out proof of it and the facts that back it up.
Show the facts I’m all ears... A person made a post that someone said the system works great short term .Most people would love to here that showing their system works great in any area. I was REAL mad because yes the system works great but it’s a long term system in which it works better. I delete the post because it wasn’t true and would Mis- lead the people who were testing my system.
The mistake the other person leaving up a bad results I saw the mistake right away and I didn’t want my readers getting confuse with many results that were posted. It’s confusing enough at times.
I have come here for no money I took time away from my own programming of the big games. I did this because I am happy when I do good things. I have some great reads to inspire people to know there are news ways to invent a system instead of going over and over the ways which I feel would never work.
Flat betting no guessing using the same Method to beat Dice Baccarat and Roulette Wow un-heard of until now.

The iceman1313

[6th-sense]

i don,t think its an insult...everyone is entitled to his or her opinion...ruffling feathers along the way is going to always happen.....i,ve just had a read through the thread and although not tested or know how to test i find it all very interesting....i remember when one member explained the pppc bet to the rest of you how it matched the results given by simon and team w3m...he was persecuted for a while that his results didn,t match ...he went all the way posting the results and wins and losses ....people appolgised after making the mistakes and calling him a liar...damage was done...although from a fresh outlook as i have just read it i think iceman should be given a bit of time to explain further ...no one is making you read his thread....fascinating