DIVIDE & CONQUER

[XXVV]

Dear Megapost Chris!

There will always be debate over testing methods as to sources of spin samples, and size of samples, and types of progression. We are even exploring possible flat staking opportunities and other second level type betting ( primary and secondary bets). Why not? Because as you see in the next paragraph there is a real optimism about this ( and other matrix family methods).

A notable feature of recording results on D+C, and it is so obvious that it does not receive the attention it deserves, is the observation that (my) results have never down trended for any prolonged period. Sure, they correct at times, but the observation is that with smart play and smart timing the results continue to long term uptrend.

Where maximum attention is being invested at the moment is to try to find optimum points to enter and the not so difficult exit points. More later.

[Johnlegend]

Dear Megapost Chris!

There will always be debate over testing methods as to sources of spin samples, and size of samples, and types of progression. We are even exploring possible flat staking opportunities and other second level type betting ( primary and secondary bets). Why not? Because as you see in the next paragraph there is a real optimism about this ( and other matrix family methods).

A notable feature of recording results on D+C, and it is so obvious that it does not receive the attention it deserves, is the observation that (my) results have never down trended for any prolonged period. Sure, they correct at times, but the observation is that with smart play and smart timing the results continue to long term uptrend.

Where maximum attention is being invested at the moment is to try to find optimum points to enter and the not so difficult exit points. More later.

Very good XXVV, look forward to your input.

[chrisbis]

I'll do my bit then.

I'll get together and finish the Matrix Feature we were going to introduce to forum,
for the purpose of presenting an as clear a portfolio as possible, the Matrix Bedrock Layout.

U will be able to chose Width, Height, and Depth.

I know Victor is real busy right now, but as soon as the Roulette Betting Tool (formally The Tipping Tool) is re-launch in June, I'm sure we can rustle up something appetising.

Meanwhile- on withe the Mega-show!!

[XXVV]

While listening to some moans from novices who do not understand how to cover 0 or 0=00, I have been playing straight up win macro games on D+C.

My last three sessions ( all lengthy) have now totaled +93 wins in a streak and as zero is so brilliantly handled in this matrix when zero then another zero appeared after an earlier appearance 10 spins earlier, this resulted in massive bonus!

The Ecart has been in consistent macro win mode now for a while.

Well done D+C
XXVV

[albertojonas]

While listening to some moans from novices who do not understand how to cover 0 or 0=00, I have been playing straight up win macro games on D+C.

My last three sessions ( all lengthy) have now totaled +93 wins in a streak and as zero is so brilliantly handled in this matrix when zero then another zero appeared after an earlier appearance 10 spins earlier, this resulted in massive bonus!

The Ecart has been in consistent macro win mode now for a while.

Well done D+C
XXVV

Great!
XXVV
how to detect the start of a correction period?
do you start your attack when STD hits 3 or 3,5 ?

cheers

[XXVV]

Up to +111 consecutive win macro games at the moment over four sessions.

Most of my earnings have been through zero cover as well.

Sorry was not sure on CPD but I use a measure where if there is only one or two micro losses per triad ( three games) that is plain sailing in win mode.

Am ready for abrupt change though and will start the fifth session with curiosity!

[ScoobyDoo]

Hi XXVV,

Looking forward to your next results post. You are doing a fantastic job on this. We are all impressed with the professional way you are approaching it.

Scooby Doo

[D1]

Hi All

Well said Scooby Doo,

and just to second that yes thank you XXVV for your professionalism and for taking the time and the trouble for sharing all your exstensive testing and approaches to D&C,

D1.

[XXVV]

Just up to +128 on the win streak (6th session) and suddenly am encountering two games that have gone (unusually for two consecutive) up to the 3rd attempt to win. Is this the long awaited turning signal. I am going to start playing loss anyway!

[XXVV]

Well to my (pleasant) surprise the mini crisis is over and the  streak has sailed on to +131 consecutive wins. The little blip of losses was followed by a string of single wins! That is why we put the =3 cap on chasing a losing streak!

[XXVV]

This is getting a bit like GroundHog Day

We sailed along to +155 games without  loss on D+C macro win. This is based on 9 sessions and no session do I stay longer than 26 games macro.

I keep adding bets to zero ( as part cover) and they keep rolling in about every 20 spins at present.

This is now 6 x the expectation and I am treating this a 'sleeper' event, rather like a single number taking 222 spins to appear.

Of course we know the sleeps can take a lot longer also!

Interesting to see what happens when 'it' wakes up.

Well done Scooby Doo - the way zero is handled within this method is very well thought through.

[XXVV]

It was getting a bit spooky and my cyber Latvian campaign has been heavy on withdrawal of profit.

The D+C streak ended on attempt #164. So there were +163 successful wins on macro! That is quite a streak. It demonstrates what we thought was likely - it is a great vehicle for basic and overlap plays.

The reason the 164th failed was zero appearing midships, so we scored the cross profit and the next spin won. So it was a technical knockout.

The subsequent 18 games played out in a very calm manner apart from a little blip at #11 and #12#13. All others were simple one bet wins. Very calm and stable.

So that was session 10 and you would have to say a remarkable performance by D+C.

All sessions were from the Latvian live feed and it has all gone very well indeed.
Next update during the coming week to see whether there is any 'reaction' to the streak by way of corrective shorter sessions. Its been great fun!

[XXVV]

By the way and this will close this particular cycle, after the big 164 streak, the next cycle was 26 exactly. Running those end games through the column D+C matrix there were three failures within 50 games and a 'loss' strategy would work.

In the middle of the night somehow I think in a semi- dream I have come up with an interesting loss strategy flat staking but with step action and a sensible trigger. I will publish this idea soon. It may have implications elsewhere also. But first I will test it on a sensible sample.

Reflecting on the streaks this technique can encourage, there is ample scope for parlay and short steps to enhance short cycle earning without undue risk exposure. I will explore some of these ideas in the Experimental thread under Framework - these ideas will have applications to all matrix methodologies when in win streak mode.

[XXVV]

The ability of this method to consistently produce streaks of win macro bets is formidable, and the relative simplicity of the methodology is praiseworthy.

I would strongly advise readers to study the best bet types that are available to trap these streaks, within reason.

My favourite is the parlay bet.

Then you can avoid the more dangerous progressions.

The recent observation by Bayes on the mathematics of the matrix is fascinating. Clearly what can improve our odds over probability is the accuracy of our selections and more importantly the timing of our entry ( trigger) and exit ( tipping point), as well as our money management and self management.

By tuning the two latter variables we can surpass expectation consistently.

An example of entry might be, after long observation to come to understand the parameters of the method outcomes, to wait for a cluster of losses to pass, and then, in accord with the swing of the Ecart, climb on board a strongly favoured streak of wins.

Probability applies to betting that is continuous, blind and dumb.

However most roulette players do worse than probability. The reason being is that a little knowledge is a very dangerous thing and to wrongly read the game can lead to catastrophic results. So great care, humility, and respect for the game is essential.

[albertojonas]

The ability of this method to consistently produce streaks of win macro bets is formidable, and the relative simplicity of the methodology is praiseworthy.

I would strongly advise readers to study the best bet types that are available to trap these streaks, within reason.

My favourite is the parlay bet.

Then you can avoid the more dangerous progressions.

The recent observation by Bayes on the mathematics of the matrix is fascinating. Clearly what can improve our odds over probability is the accuracy of our selections and more importantly the timing of our entry ( trigger) and exit ( tipping point), as well as our money management and self management.

By tuning the two latter variables we can surpass expectation consistently.

An example of entry might be, after long observation to come to understand the parameters of the method outcomes, to wait for a cluster of losses to pass, and then, in accord with the swing of the Ecart, climb on board a strongly favoured streak of wins.

Probability applies to betting that is continuous, blind and dumb.

However most roulette players do worse than probability. The reason being is that a little knowledge is a very dangerous thing and to wrongly read the game can lead to catastrophic results. So great care, humility, and respect for the game is essential.

This is Great! Great observation DR.X  

this is what i was talking about. betting in clusters and spot entry and exit triggers.

i play all methods with this methodology as maths cant win long term. it is the human factor.
Man vs machine

depending on the behavior of the accuracy of the bet design i adjust the progression and this triggers. only the knowledge that comes from practicing one bet selection can provide us a decent analyzes and strategy. Couldn't agree more.

ie.
the entry trigger I use for my mod of pattern4 is a win after a series of losses.

This single choice largely overcomes what would be expectable from probability. Despite the total of events obey the laws of probability, the effective results of the approach are far from dictated balance.

This observation leads me to forging the mildest progression i can to take profit with the least exposure.


I have to sincerely congratulate your interventions here in the forum. They are systematic, based on logical arguments and pure observations. For me it is the "serious" way to go.

My admiration,
AL