DIVIDE & CONQUER

[StackBundles]

love to have an explanation of theres terms used and how the system is played now any help would be apperciated

[XXVV]

Thanks Al and S/B.

The points you raise Alberto are so important and this is the subtle essence of coming to understand the true nature of roulette, which is a vast subject.

S/B please read this thread fully, carefully, as well as say the Experimental Ideas thread in the context of using D+C.

There is a lot of treasure elsewhere within the Forum.

Good LuckXXVV

[XXVV]

I have finished my work with this method now and acknowledge that is a wonderful host to many many extrapolations and variations, as may other very clever matrix methodologies.

For your information, these are the results of ongoing testing using the method, and do not reflect any 'smart' play adjustments such as knowing when to step on or step off.

Without such judgement there is always the risk that the corrective forces may erode much of the progress made.

1800 live games tested and overall result still a very creditable +315 points.

Maximum streak experienced 163 wins, with several 100 plus. Nevertheless of course such sequences are followed by corrections, as night follows day.

With sound judgement and skillful reading of the game this net result could be enhanced.

Other techniques that use win and loss sequences more aggressively have also been successfully tested.

Beyond all of that, the really astonishing and rewarding quality that has emerged from the recent studies, has been the realisation of the flux of forces at work in the game of roulette.

Sincere thanks to Scooby Doo for this fine methodology.

[donik7777]

Thank you for your work XXVV!
You tested the 1800 spins, and that if we beat the only second spin without progression (according to my results winnings back two more almost 2 times than the sum of losses in the 3 , 4, 5and so on together and multiplied by 2 ). 
What you get?
Please give your answer.  Thank you.

[XXVV]

Thank you for your work XXVV!
You tested the 1800 spins, and that if we beat the only second spin without progression (according to my results winnings back two more almost 2 times than the sum of losses in the 3 , 4, 5and so on together and multiplied by 2 ). 
What you get?
Please give your answer.  Thank you.

Hi Donik

I am sorry but can you please enlarge, expand and clarify your observations and question. I don't understand.

XXVV

[donik7777]

Hi XXVV!
Sorry if I wrote it is not clear (bad english).

Can you explain these 1800 spins

Wins on 1st bet =
Wins on 2nd bet =
Single Losses    =
Double losses   =
Triple losses     =

Thank You.

[XXVV]

Hello Donik

That is much clearer.

No. I am not prepared to provide that detail.

The test has grown to 2000 games now, with a further 1000 games earlier studied.

You can easily conduct your own research and testing.

A small statistical sample on the basic D+C bet will enable you to extrapolate  the outcome for 1800 games. Say for example 500 games ( about 1800 spins).
Five days play at Wiesbaden, table 3.

The sample should be neutral in the Ecart but you should also allow of course for a reasonable swing of deviation.

I have provided quite sufficient guidelines in my published work on this Forum for anyone who is serious to proceed and achieve considerable success.

[XXVV]

Great!
XXVV
how to detect the start of a correction period?
do you start your attack when STD hits 3 or 3,5 ?

cheers

I gather you mean Standard Deviation 3 x.
Good suggestion.
I use other methods - moving average of the micro loss numbers.
Hope that assists
XXVV

[Hermes]

XXVV have many spins have a one game? (1.800 games)
Hermes

[XXVV]

As I read your question...

It averages between 3 and 4 spins per game, and of course can be extended with steps and zero encounters and third bet outcomes, successful or otherwise. Thus 1800 games accounted for approximately 7000 spins, but really the number of spins is irrelevant and I wasn't counting.

Overall I have observed over 3000 games with this method.

If however you meant how many of the 1800 games were won on the first bet..

It is up to you to conduct your individual research and a suitable statistical sample can be quickly arrived at. I have indicated there are opportunities for worthwhile parlay betting as there are long, sometimes very long winning streaks but you have to factor in that you are dealing with a short progression. Elsewhere I have provided some results which are very positive but that was after a considerable amount of my time invested in trial and error variations. There are lots of opportunities here for personally developed successful bets.

These families of Matrix Bets developed by John Legend and Scooby Doo are very clever and rich in possibilities.

[Johnlegend]

Time for an update of DIVIDE AND CONQUER. After reaching a milestone.

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1000
TOTAL GAMES WON 912
TOTAL GAMES LOST 88

STRIKERATE APPROX 10/1

BALANCE 702 UNITS PLUS

LONGEST WINNING STREAK 31
LONGEST FIRST GAME WINNING STREAK 29
DOUBLE LOSSES 9

Ticking along nicely slightly under PATTERN 4 and PATTERN BREAKER for strikerate. But with its instant turnover thats to be expected. I am playing typically 5 sets of 2 games throughout the day. To achieve my numbers. Doing so produces impressive first game streaks. And overall streaks. Double losses are on a par too with the other methods. Next update at 1100 games played. 

[Halba1]

tested on betvoyager non zero

highest progression reached 2nd level(twice)

+6 units. 28 spins

[Playborne]

Nice work, keep the good job Scooby.

[clothdog]

What is the difference between Pattern4 and Pattern Breaker?

CD

[XXVV]

Have completed a phase of work on D+C and have produced a summary of this on the Experimental Ideas thread.

What I really want to do now is not only apply some of the positive techniques with D+C that have been developed, but also review and re-visit in the light of this detail experience a lot of the matrix family of bets developed by JohnLegend.

It may be that a sensible overlap between methods can further help our aim to succeed, and when it is taken patiently a step at a time this will be a fascinating and very worthwhile journey.

Interwoven can also be further insight into Randomness and the Ecart/Equilibre forces at work in roulette.