• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

DIVIDE & CONQUER

Started by ScoobyDoo, Apr 24, 12:28 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

vladir

I have ben using this method with sucess, but I have a question. Lets assume you get this:

1 2 3   2 2 2  3 3 3

Then it cames:
3 2 1 (its a win)

After we get:
3

What do you bet against now? The initial 333 or the last 321 ?


Also, how many games should we play before retracking? Any ideas?

Thank you.



"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

Drazen

Quote from: vladir on Aug 09, 09:13 AM 2011
I have ben using this method with sucess, but I have a question. Lets assume you get this:

1 2 3   2 2 2  3 3 3

Then it cames:
3 2 1 (its a win)

After we get:
3

What do you bet against now? The initial 333 or the last 321 ?


Also, how many games should we play before retracking? Any ideas?

Thank you.

You would bet against 321. You always bet against LAST formation in dozen.

Reagrds

Drazen

amk

Hello Scoobydoo,

Great to see you posting again.......

Although it is not necessary, I always like to try and tweak the great methods.........

Its just an idea at this stage..... D&C for even chances........

HO is now called 1
HE  "     "             2
LO                       3
LE                        4


Spins 12: 223134343223

4 Groups: 223      134       343        223


                1223                             2134                               3343                              4223
                                                                                       


Trigger is 3:

3343
3..... bet against pattern


I might be overlooking something, any thoughts............

                           

amk

Could also use just groups of 2.....

This would mean 2 bets, 3 units?..............

          142        212     344     413

Trigger is 2:

212
2....  bet against pattern......

amk

Sorry everybody,

I overlooked something........

It's not possible to bet for even chances the way I explained it.....

Hope somebody might see something though..........

Scoobydoo, you already said that D&C can only be played one way.........

I think you might have already looked at all the angles............

Koekke

This system is still going very good for me, there were a few times when I had to use the 3th progression level. But it turned out ok, I did not have more than 2 losses.

I also think that the key to this system is patience, you have to stay calm and don't jump to the next progression level too soon. Just stick to the progression levels and do not bet more. When you try to gain all back in 1 bet chances are big that you will lose it all.

vladir

Well... lost all my winnings with a session from hell:

123 233 323
111 221 323
122 221 333
122 221 331
132        331

11 games, 5 losses... game over... I still think this is a good method...

This was a live wheel, at william hill.
"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

Johnlegend

RESULTS UPDATE FOR DIVIDE AND CONQUER FOR 27/08/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 2,480

TOTAL GAMES WON 2,283

TOTAL GAMES LOST 197

STRIKERATE APPROX 11/1

BALANCE 1,876 UNITS PLUS

LONGEST WINNING STREAK 31

DOUBLE LOSSES 15

This method HOLDS as the strongest fast paced method I have encountered to date. It compliments methods like PATTERN BREAKER and THE REVERSE SLIDE beautifully. As they take more time to mature. But of course the compromise is a far smaller strikerate. It always will be. That said, what I look for in a method is an overall profit generator. Divide and Conquer does just that.

donik7777

Who plays 00 roulette?
I wanted to say that I'm testing and keep getting permanently 5-10 units of 200-300 spins, I think this is a good result.
Thank you John Legend for help
1,780 games played.
STEP 1 WINS 1,072      i pass this step
STEP 2 WINS 567        i play only 2 step      win
GAMES LOST 141                                      lost
567-(141x2=282)=285 units

  I play without progression.
If any questions please.


vundarosa

Quote from: donik7777 on Sep 07, 07:46 PM 2011
Who plays 00 roulette?
I wanted to say that I'm testing and keep getting permanently 5-10 units of 200-300 spins, I think this is a good result.
Thank you John Legend for help
1,780 games played.
STEP 1 WINS 1,072      i pass this step
STEP 2 WINS 567        i play only 2 step      win
GAMES LOST 141                                      lost
567-(141x2=282)=285 units

  I play without progression.
If any questions please.

----------------------

hi donik

don't get it why you would only play step 2...any particular reason?!

vundarosa

donik7777

Hi Vundarosa!
Because different between 2 step and lost how i showed  285 units or win more than lost in 2 times.
Are you play 00?
You can test. 

vundarosa

Quote from: donik7777 on Sep 07, 08:39 PM 2011
Hi Vundarosa!
Because different between 2 step and lost how i showed  285 units or win more than lost in 2 times.
Are you play 00?
You can test.

-----------------

in that case, wouldn't it be better to play only step 1?!

vundarosa

donik7777

Vundarosa if you play 1 step
STEP 1 WINS 1,072     
STEP 2 WINS 567       
GAMES LOST 141 


567+141=708x2=1416 units

1072 -1416= -344 units
   

vundarosa

Quote from: donik7777 on Sep 07, 10:17 PM 2011
Vundarosa if you play 1 step
STEP 1 WINS 1,072     
STEP 2 WINS 567       
GAMES LOST 141 


567+141=708x2=1416 units

1072 -1416= -344 units
   

-----------
see what you mean.... worth testing it! I don't play on 0/00 table but don't see why it wouldn't work on single zero table as well

vundarosa

Johnlegend

RESULTS UPDATE FOR DIVIDE AND CONQUER FOR 17/9/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 2,900

TOTAL GAMES WON 2,662

TOTAL GAMES LOST 238

STRIKERATE APPROX 11/1

BALANCE 2,078 UNITS PLUS

DOUBLE LOSSES 15

This continues to be a very solid fast paced method. Amazingly no double losses over the last 420 games. I continue to play 5 times 4 sessions per day for a total of 20 games per day. Next update around 3,200 games.

-