DIVIDE & CONQUER

[vundarosa]

Thanks XXVV!
What dozen (column) you choosing, for example you play against 1 dozen (column).
Best regards.

----------------
donik,

I don't think XXVV is playing against a dozen i.e betting two doz/cols but rather he's betting a single doz/col.

XXVV is that correct?, and how do you select which doz/col to play?

Vundarosa

[Robeenhuut]

@Donik
One loss is no big deal my friend if it is a mere 21 units.

I use progression
1
1
2
2
3
5
7  adds to 21  and
+2 on bet one
+1 on bet two
and +1 on bet 6

all others b/ even.

if you read my threads elsewhere there are plenty of ideas on monitoring the moving average of bet outcomes.

its all in the timing - when to start and stop.
You want to climb onto a short win streak then get out aiming for +9 to say +15 units per mini session.
Hope that helps.

Hello XXVV

This is prog for single Dz and you also win 2u on bet 3. This is confusing.
We discuss here prog for 2 dozens for D&C.

Regards

[Amazin]

Hmmm, I'm even more confused now because right now XXVV seems to be using a different method here. So you betting on a single dozen now?

[XXVV]

@Amazin

If you want to succeed I suggest you read the considerable material that is offered here, on this thread, and in some other interlinked threads.

If in doubt ask some other readers but I play a reverse of the D+C which targets only one dozen, of course.

Good Fortune

[vundarosa]

@Amazin

If you want to succeed I suggest you read the considerable material that is offered here, on this thread, and in some other interlinked threads.

If in doubt ask some other readers but I play a reverse of the D+C which targets only one dozen, of course.

Good Fortune

-----------------------

Hi XXVV, how do you go about chosing which doz/col to bet?

vundarosa

[Nasio]

Looks a promising system.

Just recorded a winning streak of 42 just on level one.

Maybe I'm doing something wrong. 

[nayan007]

For sure success Divide & Conquer method is the best

[XXVV]

@vundarosa
Sorry for delay.
You have asked which doz or Col I bet.
Well, I simply reverse what the positive D+C suggests. It recommends two.
Well I bet the other, the remaining one.
That is the gist of it.
Then its all to do with timing, and timing of entry and exit, and monitoring of moving averages.
Sometimes of course there will be streaks of wins for the postive D+C, but you are risking a lot for a small reward.
By reversing that you can come up with a smarter bet which has a higher return in relation to cost, and thus is capable of handling adverse or corrective phases.
The simple reverse bet has winning streaks which would cripple a continous standard D+C player.
Hope this assists you.
R
XXVV

[Robeenhuut]

@vundarosa
Sorry for delay.
You have asked which doz or Col I bet.
Well, I simply reverse what the positive D+C suggests. It recommends two.
Well I bet the other, the remaining one.
That is the gist of it.
Then its all to do with timing, and timing of entry and exit, and monitoring of moving averages.
Sometimes of course there will be streaks of wins for the postive D+C, but you are risking a lot for a small reward.
By reversing that you can come up with a smarter bet which has a higher return in relation to cost, and thus is capable of handling adverse or corrective phases.
The simple reverse bet has winning streaks which would cripple a continous standard D+C player.
Hope this assists you.
R
XXVV

You must have a really good feel for trends.  I only use this prog if 1 dozen sleeps for 16 times hehe. Never lost this bet and it happens quite often. I know that it can sleep for 30 times though

Regards

[ANONYMOUS]

hey guys, a lot of testing still needs to be done, but i am curious how many times in divide and conquer you see a triple in one column  for example

122
122
122

[ego]

If you are going to play against repeats or imbalance then you can not make straight up bets.
Does repeats and imbalance is part of the game and very pressent witch would not make it any different then playing against any other selection.

[Koekke]

Today I had following sequence on a live wheel :-(. I should have hit and run after the first 1 or 2 games right?

1   1   1
1   1   3
1   1   3
      
2   2   3
2   3   2
2   3   2
      
3   2   1
3   1   1
3   1   1

[6th-sense]

pretty interesting ego...d+c is a really good selection way to play ...has anyone apart from xxvv tried to make a better the way to use the results?...i,m 1800 spins down the line without going past the 4th step ie bank if 80....1,1   3,3  9,9 27,27...continious 100 spin sessions...if i get to 3000 spins without a loss then i,ll post the improvement to d+c....if it gets there it could have an agressive 4 step marty with everything won at the point parlayed onto the 4th step each time it appeared....average win at moment is 12 to 16 points per 100 spins...i,m also going to look if when iv,e done the 3000 spin sessions if i can utilise the same 100 spin sessions to make 100 into 200 using the same numbers but staggered as if you just walked into play the next bet on? also maybe matrix 5 could be played on the results at same time against 7 runs...? i don,t like progressions but at the moment with the way i,m using the results ...written down excactly the same as before but using results differently from the way it is now it could worth the risk...just another 1200 spins to go for me and i,ll let you know the results

[Robeenhuut]

Today I had following sequence on a live wheel :-(. I should have hit and run after the first 1 or 2 games right?

1   1   1
1   1   3
1   1   3
     
2   2   3
2   3   2
2   3   2
     
3   2   1
3   1   1
3   1   1

Hello

It can happen quite often but what would you expect when you bet against 1 Dz?  You can get 2 or 3 losses in a row.  MM can help you only a bit.  You can divide your bets in any sophisticated pattern  but remember that you just bet against 1 Dz and you can loose few times in a row.


Regards

[Bettor 27]

Sounds interesting 6th sense - look forward to hearing the results of your experiment...

pretty interesting ego...d+c is a really good selection way to play ...has anyone apart from xxvv tried to make a better the way to use the results?...I'm 1800 spins down the line without going past the 4th step ie bank if 80....1,1   3,3  9,9 27,27...continious 100 spin sessions...if i get to 3000 spins without a loss then i,ll post the improvement to d+c....if it gets there it could have an agressive 4 step marty with everything won at the point parlayed onto the 4th step each time it appeared....average win at moment is 12 to 16 points per 100 spins...I'm also going to look if when iv,e done the 3000 spin sessions if i can utilise the same 100 spin sessions to make 100 into 200 using the same numbers but staggered as if you just walked into play the next bet on? also maybe matrix 5 could be played on the results at same time against 7 runs...? i don't like progressions but at the moment with the way I'm using the results ...written down excactly the same as before but using results differently from the way it is now it could worth the risk...just another 1200 spins to go for me and i,ll let you know the results