Bermuda Triangle Turbo

[Smee]

Hey Hermes. . . . I tried various variations of this theme while playing around with JL's idea.  They all seemed to lose roughly with a ratio of 9 wins to 1 loss.  I think this is because using 3 rows of EC's there are only 8 different combinations.

HHH
HHL
HLH
HLL
LHH
LLH
LHL
LLL

I think thats right.  So then I went to 4 rows using the EC's as there are 15 combinations - I think.  I stuck with the martingale of JL's system.  It still failed more times than I liked so now im trying the Dozens with 4 rows.  I havnt properly worked out how many combinations there are but its gotta be around 50ish.

I also dont know how to treat the zero. . . And I need a decent progression for 4 bets - one for each row.

If this dosnt work i was going to try lines.  I figure theres gotta be a hundred combinations at least over 4 rows.

[F_LAT_INO]

No intention to trash Hermes method,but since we are here to
assist each other,well here is my view of this bet,it is how I play;

9 spins of any EC virtually

r  r  b  r  b  b  b  r  r....now start betting for a repeat,with the wheel,cycle of 9 bets flat bet.

If lose,rise the bet on next cycle of 9 spins as follows;

--9 un. if lose all 9 bets.
--7 un. if lose      8 bets
--4 un. if lose      7 bets
--2 un. if lose      6 bets

Same on winnings when down.

Originally I play this with 8 spins repeat,but just wanted to show the Hermes idea
/which is actually same/but with different approach of stakings.

[Hermes]

What do you mean with the 4 in row smee? Something like that:
LLLL
HLHL
LHLH
LLLH  that's 16 spins. I mentioned in the system that square12 would be better than square 9.

Progression is not a problem but I am surprised with you negative results guys! I won another 200 spins and max. losses in row 4. It could be played the other way also, bet not against but the same what came 9 spins ago. And bet against and the same could be combined!
I used Oscar Grind progression (win +1 u, Loss hold the same until in plus) and won on 200 spins 65 units. The zero put on side not into the square. If loss on zero bet the second in the row.
INO you look younger and younger how do you do it?
Yes, you could bet 3 rows flat and when in minus rise next 3 rows to 2 units and when still not winning bet next 3 rows 4 units. When total in plus reset to 1 unit again.
Hermes

[Hermes]

I went on Friday again to play the baccarat in land casino. I won 17 units on shoe of 83.
here is the session:
PBP
PPB
BBB
-----
BPP   W B1
BBB   W B1
BPB   W P1, P1
PBB   W P1
PPP   W P1
PPP   W P1
BPB   W B1
BBB   W B1
PPB   W B1, B1, B2
PBB   W P1
PPP   W P1
BBB   W B1
PPB   W P1, P1
BBP   W B1
PBB   W P1
BPP   W B1
PBP   W P1
PBB   L   B1, P1, P2
PBB   W P2
BBP   W B2
PP     W B1, P2.

As you can see it is holy schmoly if enough bankroll (on baccarat $10 min - bankroll $700).
I already could sell the system to a Chinese for $1.000 but I didn't have the stomach for it.
Another bulletproof system is: wait for first TIE and then wait for 10 no TIE hands and apply a progression on appearance of TIE only! Bet for 3 ties in one shoe to be on the secure side. Average is 6 ties for a shoe. You cannot lose with that strategy.
Cheers Hermes

[Halba1]

I went on Friday again to play the baccarat in land casino. I won 17 units on shoe of 83.
here is the session:
PBP
PPB
BBB
-----
BPP   W B1
BBB   W B1
BPB   W P1, P1
PBB   W P1
PPP   W P1
PPP   W P1
BPB   W B1
BBB   W B1
PPB   W B1, B1, B2
PBB   W P1
PPP   W P1
BBB   W B1
PPB   W P1, P1
BBP   W B1
PBB   W P1
BPP   W B1
PBP   W P1
PBB   L   B1, P1, P2
PBB   W P2
BBP   W B2
PP     W B1, P2.

As you can see it is holy schmoly if enough bankroll (on baccarat $10 min - bankroll $700).
I already could sell the system to a Chinese for $1.000 but I didn't have the stomach for it.
Another bulletproof system is: wait for first TIE and then wait for 10 no TIE hands and apply a progression on appearance of TIE only! Bet for 3 ties in one shoe to be on the secure side. Average is 6 ties for a shoe. You cannot lose with that strategy.
Cheers Hermes

i did this progression for a tie. i won twice, with a decent progression. need a good bankroll. I used 11 hands instead of 10 hands wait.

[Halba1]

this is the best system on roulette forum. atleast you can play each line. no waiting spins. high strike rate. code 4+bermuda triangle might be a good bet.

[Hermes]

I tweaked it even further with excellent results! New name: Bermuda Triangle Random.  

1A1A     You bet always against that rigid triangle. I tested 500 spins and heavy won.    
2B2B     Maximum 2 spin failures. It is a Holy Schmoly in long run if betting with Leveller.
3C3C
-------
20,29,36,19          
9,33,33,19
8,21,8,35
-----------------------------
21,22,34,34
7,27,28,13
19,9,7,16
-----------------------------
10,9,12,3
33,22,30,29
7,16,28,25

Numbers in bold winners. 27 winners and 9 losers. It could be beaten if lucky enough even with that stupid progression 1-3-9-21.
Look at my post number 333
Hermes

[Halba1]

hi, hermes are you betting against each letter/number, i.e. every spin? let us know what line are you betting against.

[Hermes]

No I am betting only till hit in row but gave you an example that it could be played all spins.
Moe money coming in pockets.
Hermes

[Halba1]

No I am betting only till hit in row but gave you an example that it could be played all spins.
Moe money coming in pockets.
Hermes

that's what I intend to do. imagine playing with $5 units. i have a good bankroll.

[Halba1]

No I am betting only till hit in row but gave you an example that it could be played all spins.
Moe money coming in pockets.
Hermes

where are you playing this at. which casino?

[Tomla021]

good luck with it hermes---ain't this a nicer place than that baccarat forum:)

[Hermes]

Halba777 would be more lucky combination. I play a little 10% online live and 90% land casinos. I like the atmosphere of casinos missing online. Triangle also means 3. Never bet for real RNGs. RNGs are for suicidal and retarded. RNGs = Slaughter (slot) machines, remember that!

Tomla021, you look familiar Tommy Cruise! How is the weather in Hollywood? Yes, when people are not creative they are miserable and there are a few of them.

Yes, I am also thinking to sweep  the rows instead to bet just until hit. The phantasy has no boundary. This strategy is so versatile that you can play it even on guitar. Again, thanks to Johnlegend idea. I like also another fast learners GLC and Kattila.

2 nights ago I tested this creation on Smartlive casino and made $50. It was after midnight and I got sleepy like dozens do and went to sleep as a winner.
Happy gambling
Hermes

[albertojonas]

What do you mean with the 4 in row smee? Something like that:
LLLL
HLHL
LHLH
LLLH  that's 16 spins. I mentioned in the system that square12 would be better than square 9.

Progression is not a problem but I am surprised with you negative results guys! I won another 200 spins and max. losses in row 4. It could be played the other way also, bet not against but the same what came 9 spins ago. And bet against and the same could be combined!
I used Oscar Grind progression (win +1 u, Loss hold the same until in plus) and won on 200 spins 65 units. The zero put on side not into the square. If loss on zero bet the second in the row.
INO you look younger and younger how do you do it?
Yes, you could bet 3 rows flat and when in minus rise next 3 rows to 2 units and when still not winning bet next 3 rows 4 units. When total in plus reset to 1 unit again.
Hermes

patterns of 8 should give about 256 combinations.

255 winning against 1 loosing
For all this matters it would take a mild fibbo progression (and you are the king of that) to get ahead as the LW path will aim for correction sooner or latter.
We do not have to win every step of progression to end in profit...

Just my 2 cents.

Cheers,
AL

[Halba1]

I tweaked it even further with excellent results! New name: Bermuda Triangle Random.  

1A1A     You bet always against that rigid triangle. I tested 500 spins and heavy won.    
2B2B     Maximum 2 spin failures. It is a Holy Schmoly in long run if betting with Leveller.
3C3C
-------
20,29,36,19          
9,33,33,19
8,21,8,35
-----------------------------
21,22,34,34
7,27,28,13
19,9,7,16
-----------------------------
10,9,12,3
33,22,30,29
7,16,28,25

Numbers in bold winners. 27 winners and 9 losers. It could be beaten if lucky enough even with that silly progression 1-3-9-21.
Look at my post number 333
Hermes

hello hermes. this is most amazing. 27-9 ratio. did you this one on smartlive? you could even play the row immediately above. the odds are the same. makes no difference. you could even flat bet and be up a lot.