SNAKE ZIG-ZAG DOUBLE BITE

[foreverBOB]

Thanks for sharing this system Flat Ino.
I have given it some test sessions, but the last one got me a bit confused.
I had repeating third collumn showing with a few zeros in between.  This resulted in 1 units on B  stick and win, but at the same time A was building up towards over 20 units.
When A hitted, it didnt last long and it quickly switched back to B.  So recovering was almost impossible.
I think 500BR is more than enough, but I have lost all that BR in my last session.

If the outcomes zigzag in between A and B, the results are indeed profitable. 
But if for example a first or third collumn repeats too much the other collumn will add up, making a recovery only possible if it switches back to the added up section and stays there to recover.

best regards,
Bob

[F_LAT_INO]

Thanks for sharing this system Flat Ino.
I have given it some test sessions, but the last one got me a bit confused.
I had repeating third column showing with a few zeros in between.  This resulted in 1 units on B  stick and win, but at the same time A was building up towards over 20 units.
When A hitted, it didn't last long and it quickly switched back to B.  So recovering was almost impossible.
I think 500BR is more than enough, but I have lost all that BR in my last session.

If the outcomes zigzag in between A and B, the results are indeed profitable. 
But if for example a first or third column repeats too much the other column will add up, making a recovery only possible if it switches back to the added up section and stays there to recover.

best regards,
Bob

Could you describe your play pls......as think you might be doing something wrong here since you mentioning 3th.column...as its not whole part of the B bet,only 3/6--15/18--27/30......these 3 splits are part of column 3 under bet B.

[foreverBOB]

Yes, Ino,
Thats exactly what I mean.  I am talking about third collumn, which is a part of B.
What do we do if collumn 1 or 3 repeats itself consequtively so many times that the other betseclection A or B adds up in progression?
Is there a stoplimit?
I have studied dozens and collumns for a long while and I actualy gave up on that, but as we all know, it is commun that one specific collumn hits consequtively.
This system is based upon the assumption that all collumns will likely hit equaly after a period of time or lets say "session time".
Right?

[Colbster]

I experienced the same thing this afternoon during testing.  My 3rd column was hot, so the entire A bet was up over 20 units while B bet stayed at 1 unit.  I was down about 800 units, never recovering suitably after over 100 spins.

[marivo]

I experienced the same thing this afternoon during testing.  My 3rd column was hot, so the entire A bet was up over 20 units while B bet stayed at 1 unit.  I was down about 800 units, never recovering suitably after over 100 spins.

Your 3rd column can be hot, but you have 6 numbers of bet A and 6 numbers of bet B in 3rd column, so why that would be a problem? Are you saying that in 3rd column were hitted just numbers from 1 bet (lets say from bet A)?

[vundarosa]

I experienced the same thing this afternoon during testing.  My 3rd column was hot, so the entire A bet was up over 20 units while B bet stayed at 1 unit.  I was down about 800 units, never recovering suitably after over 100 spins.

----------------------

i had the same hapen during testing...i decided then to start raising only one side of the zigzag and its been doing quite well this way as the drawdown is less this way...when middle colum hits i get to profit easier

vundarosa

[foreverBOB]

Ok,

I am sorry, I was playing wrong betsections.
It is all clear now and I will further test it.
Just to clear things up on 3th collumn:
3/6, 21/24, 33/36 belong to B.

best regards,
Bob

[kiamessi]

ITS NOT PLAYED LIKE THAT......that's why I removed your other post
with your remarks...therefore learn its all here to read then report back your results with
proper playing it.

i didn't play like this, that was only my first thought but then I fully understood that and played as you showed.
Why got that result was that one side bet was only 1 unit but the other one was up to more than 20 and the ball kept hitting on the lower one and several zeros came up as well, it only hit couple of times on the higher bets but not too often, that's why I lost

[Colbster]

Sorry, Flat!

I mis-read your excel spreadsheet instructions -- totally my fault! This looks great!

[soggett]

I doubt it as have really started this with such idea................but
when one of the 1/3 columns goes to sleep for 12-15 spins  then column 2 should be hitting every 2nd.spin to overcome this sleep......but thisway these quads are kind of zig-zaging evenly so far in my real playings.

Yes, I see what you mean, thanks

[joiner29]

could you explain a little more about the bet selection, i to have witnessed one  hot column which can make the betting a little scary on the cold column, and that seems to be when the dreaded zero always shows up i like this method maybe a little tweak could make it even better

[joiner29]

sorry the  above question was for vunderosa

[F_LAT_INO]

i didn't play like this, that was only my first thought but then I fully understood that and played as you showed.
Why got that result was that one side bet was only 1 unit but the other one was up to more than 20 and the ball kept hitting on the lower one and several zeros came up as well, it only hit couple of times on the higher bets but not too often, that's why I lost

Kiamessi my friend,
You stated in your post that you have lost 2000 BR,which is theoreticaly impossible,and that my friend I think that you are doing something wrong........I had a turbulent session on airball this morning/whic I will document it here today/more then 100 spins in minus but at the end of journey it all ended as expected.1000 un.you can't lose playing 8 hours with the worst session imaginable......and if you know the behaviour of roulette law.....it all evens up at the end............and thats the fact.

[Tomla021]

i played it at a casino yesterday , american double zero....quickly into a hole with 8 zeros and not may mid columns hits..but it pulled back after awhile and was almost even when i had to leave....not sure but im wondering if one extra chip on either a or b (the one not hitting) and one chip on zero's,,, would it help or screw up the whole idea?

[marivo]

I played it at a casino yesterday , american double zero....quickly into a hole with 8 zeros and not may mid columns hits..but it pulled back after awhile and was almost even when I had to leave....not sure but I'm wondering if one extra chip on either a or b (the one not hitting) and one chip on zero's,,, would it help or screw up the whole idea?

What about if we just "change the sites" if there is 20 or more units on a corner?
Ex:
bet A - 20u on corner
bet B -   3u on corner
we loss and
from here on we "change sites" and next bet:
bet A - 2u on corner
bet B - 22u on corner
and we hope that "hot" site will bring us in plus. Just a thought.