• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

RANDOM VERSUS RANDOM--WINNING WAYS

Started by F_LAT_INO, Jul 22, 03:41 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lulloz

Very good one, i like this system !!

Thx for sharing.

Boo_Ray

100 spin test.. drawdown was right after two zeros striked... As I was betting like I suggested - I didn't lost very much on zeros..

Bayes

Just to clarify, are you supposed to pick one bet selection for each side (red/black) and use a D'Alembert independently on each?

Why 3 different bet selections in the spreadsheet?
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Bayes on Jul 25, 03:57 PM 2010
Just to clarify, are you supposed to pick one bet selection for each side (red/black) and use a D'Alembert independently on each?

Why 3 different bet selections in the spreadsheet?
It actually relies on 3 different bets,that are supporting each other in a way
where a penultimate ---in runs,and chops---are generators of whole project.
RRBBRRBBRRBBRR---THESE 14 SPINS WILL EAT YOUR BR OF 105 UN.
It happens once and again,but nevertheless the method does well on the long run.

You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

Boo_Ray

test 2

F_LAT_INO

Boo Ray,
Nice of you for testing it,but my suggestion would be to test it on the
350-400 spin basis/usual night session/---and since am old fashion chap,
I can't read these charts,so if you could tell me results.
BTW-only Lapartage condition.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

Bayes

Ok, what I wrote didn't make sense.  ;D

If you're betting all 3 (DBL, FTL, OLD) then you will lose if the table is very choppy won't you?
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Lulloz

Try to play at Betvoyager no zero table, it works great.

Work great don't mean infallible, but great :)

Very nice one Flatino , thx.

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Bayes on Jul 25, 05:31 PM 2010
Ok, what I wrote didn't make sense.  ;D

If you're betting all 3 (DBL, FTL, OLD) then you will lose if the table is very choppy won't you?
On the contrary--every choppy outcome wins 1 unit---winning on opp.a nd penultimate;
r
b
r
b
r
b
...........and after each win restart a new game......on chops you are losing on trends 1 unit--
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

Bayes

Yes, it's been a long day...  :D

Do you reset each separate progression when you are in profit overall? (new high balance).
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Lulloz on Jul 25, 05:39 PM 2010
Try to play at Betvoyager no zero table, it works great.

Work great don't mean infallible, but great :)

Very nice one F_LAT_INO , thx.
Nothing is great in roulette,Lulloz.
The advantage of this playing is that you are not,chasing,waiting or greatly progressing
to win your unit,just playing up with randomness in its natural way.

You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

Lulloz

I'm a fan of random vs random but i never have see it applied on EC this way.

I'm trying my way with single numbers but i'm writing right now my "rules" directly on the table       and that's not easy at all ;)


F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Bayes on Jul 25, 05:44 PM 2010
Yes, it's been a long day...  :D

Do you reset each separate progression when you are in profit overall? (new high balance).

Restart 1 un.on each......but for these that 1 un.is to much ---can continue with + - 1 chip
as as unit in EU is usually 10 euros---chip 2 euros,so instead of ;

penultimate                 last dec.           opposite

1-L                                  1-W                   1-L.......NOW CONTINUE
6-CHIPS                          5-CHIPS             6-CHIPS

less win on the long run,but also harder to lose a BR,stop-los.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

Boo_Ray

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Jul 25, 05:02 PM 2010
Boo Ray,
Nice of you for testing it,but my suggestion would be to test it on the
350-400 spin basis/usual night session/---and since am old fashion chap,
I can't read these charts,so if you could tell me results.
BTW-only Lapartage condition.


Test1: +31 at spin 100... highest peak +35.. maximum drawdown: 35units
Test2: +41 at spin 100... highest peak +41.. maximum drawdown: 30units

I will try to test with more spins.. but for now I will do a couple more 100spin tests.. I think it can't be too different... more short term tests is equal to less longer tests :) but you are more concentrated on short sessions therefore less room for error..

F_LAT_INO

Boo Ray,

Could you show us example how you are doing this betting--
As I pressume that you are doing it different/maybe you find even better way-LOL/
Since it is almost impossible that this method could win 41 un.in 100 spins---as it
should be winning, as you have presented,every 2,7 spin 1 unit.
I'm sure you are doing it wrongly,but show us how---maybe we got the better bet the way you do it.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

-