Col & Street method

[Drazen]

Ok second test. Starting bank 500. Ended +657 120 spins, so profit +157. Highest point +861 And I had lost progression 3 times in a row. So lowest point then was +297 so DD of -203 points. And that was at start. So that means I lost first 3 progressions in a row. Was little discouraging... But after that I got to +861 so I see some trends here... Is this your system CD with which you won good money, mentioning that in P4 thread maybe? And how are you experiences with this? Playing this for real maybe? I am testing every system on about 30x100 spins and then I make conclusions. So still testing is ahead. But I got your full attention. And i like these big numbers, but i would use maybe milder progression

Regards

Drazen

[clothdog]

Thanks! I try
CD

[clothdog]

Ok second test. Starting bank 500. Ended +657 120 spins, so profit +157. Highest point +861 And I had lost progression 3 times in a row. So lowest point then was +297 so DD of -203 points. And that was at start. So that means I lost first 3 progressions in a row. Was little discouraging... But after that I got to +861 so I see some trends here... Is this your system CD with which you won good money, mentioning that in P4 thread maybe? And how are you experiences with this? Playing this for real maybe? I am testing every system on about 30x100 spins and then I make conclusions. So still testing is ahead. But I got your full attention. And I like these big numbers, but I would use maybe milder progression

Regards

Drazen

I look at the marquee and see how the numbers are falling. If I see 2 wins on the marquee within my 3 progression, I'm good to go. If I see a loss, meaning past 3 progressions I will wait till I see 2 wins. I always stop at 3 progression and if I lose  I restart from the beginning. You can figure what would be best for you. Actually Drazen, this method of mine is fairly new. I discovered it off of my single system using the same groups.Thanks for testing. When I hit 25% of my Br won I stop. you can do this easily with this method. Yes, I have done very well,playing for real, but I will introduce how I use only 1 column. Still working on it. it should be great! I will post.
CD

[Robeenhuut]

I look at the marquee and see how the numbers are falling. If I see 2 wins on the marquee within my 3 progression, I'm good to go. If I see a loss, meaning past 3 progressions I will wait till I see 2 wins. I always stop at 3 progression and if I lose  I restart from the beginning. You can figure what would be best for you. Actually Drazen, this method of mine is fairly new. I discovered it off of my single system using the same groups.Thanks for testing. When I hit 25% of my Br won I stop. you can do this easily with this method. Yes, I have done very well,playing for real, but I will introduce how I use only 1 column. Still working on it. it should be great! I will post.
CD

It has some potential. 91 wins & 1 loss  using 1,3,9,27 prog. I think that u need some trigger with that. More updates later. 

[clothdog]

thanks Robeenhuut. yes, but maybe when you hit 3rd progression.Start over.
I think the single column system will help. Still working on it.
CD

[buffalowizard]

Ok second test. Starting bank 500. Ended +657 120 spins, so profit +157. Highest point +861 And I had lost progression 3 times in a row. So lowest point then was +297 so DD of -203 points. And that was at start. So that means I lost first 3 progressions in a row. Was little discouraging... But after that I got to +861 so I see some trends here... Is this your system CD with which you won good money, mentioning that in P4 thread maybe? And how are you experiences with this? Playing this for real maybe? I am testing every system on about 30x100 spins and then I make conclusions. So still testing is ahead. But I got your full attention. And I like these big numbers, but I would use maybe milder progression

Regards


Drazen

Hi Drazen,


Were you only playing the columns for 120 spins? If so how did you get to +157, just asking because on the columns each win gets you +1.


In my initial tests you get around 15/20 bets per 100 spins. I haven't hit a loss yet (-26units) but went to 3rd stage a couple of times.


Still, it seems a comfortable system, and definately safe without the need for a huge br.


BW

[Drazen]

Hi Drazen,


Were you only playing the columns for 120 spins? If so how did you get to +157, just asking because on the columns each win gets you +1.


In my initial tests you get around 15/20 bets per 100 spins. I haven't hit a loss yet (-26units) but went to 3rd stage a couple of times.


Still, it seems a comfortable system, and definately safe without the need for a huge br.


BW

I played on straight numbers of course. how this could be apllyied on columns??? Razor asked me same thing as you did btw 

BR
           Drazen

[Drazen]

After several minutes doubting myself and after Razor brought this to my attention, it became clear once we realised the #1 was missing from the line I agree the post explanation was misleading but I belive this is correct, if the Clothdog could confirm would be best for all. Otherwise I think Clothdog would said wait 2 columns to hit then play these 2

Regards
                 Drazen

[Drazen]

And dear Clothdog if i can suggest milder progression?
As we are betting 12 numbers ,after LL +1 unit on every W -1. So 1 win covers 2 losses.

Regards
                Drazen

[Hermes]

Works better L +1 unit, W -2 units.
Hermes

[buffalowizard]

After several minutes doubting myself and after Razor brought this to my attention, it became clear once we realised the #1 was missing from the line I agree the post explanation was misleading but I belive this is correct, if the Clothdog could confirm would be best for all. Otherwise I think Clothdog would said wait 2 columns to hit then play these 2

Regards
                 Drazen

The way I understand it Drazen is this:


If either the numbers from A or B shows up 2 in a row, then you bet columns 1+2 or 1+3 respectively with the standard 24 number progression 1,3,9


BW

[Drazen]

The way I understand it Drazen is this:


If either the numbers from A or B shows up 2 in a row, then you bet columns 1+2 or 1+3 respectively with the standard 24 number progression 1,3,9


BW

Well my friend, we dont have 24 numbers to bet.. 12 in A 12 in B If you dont understand put them on table and you will see why doesnt have sense to bet 2 rows. We dont have all numbers from rows to bet, why whould we bet whole rows? Right? 

Regards
                   Drazen

[IIIRAZORIII]

ok me and drazen been chatting and we feel this is very strong system so far, so to help save confusion I try to explain the rows method as best I can.

basically we spin until we get two numbers to hit one after another from eith A or B as show in the OP.

i.e 8,25 = trigger for row 1&2 (A)

if we hit great we win if we lose we start progression betting the same numbers.
now atm progression is still under debate. Personaly I use

1) Bet: $ 1 on 12 spots. Profit on a Win: $ 24 Bankroll Needed: $12
2) Bet: $ 1 on 12 spots. Profit on a Win: $ 12 Bankroll Needed: $24
3) Bet: $ 2 on 12 spots. Profit on a Win: $ 24 Bankroll Needed: $48
4) Bet: $ 3 on 12 spots. Profit on a Win: $ 24 Bankroll Needed: $84
5) Bet: $ 4 on 12 spots. Profit on a Win: $ 12 Bankroll Needed: $132
6) Bet: $ 6 on 12 spots. Profit on a Win: $ 12 Bankroll Needed: $204
7) Bet: $ 9 on 12 spots. Profit on a Win: $ 12 Bankroll Needed: $312

once we hit, we then start tracking again looking for two hit in a row on rows 1 & 3 (B)
we always bet alternate rows, don't keep betting triggers from 1 pair, ie A
bets should be ABABABA.....etc

anyways this is how I understand if i'm wrong shoot me, but been testing this way and the strike rate is very good, +500 from under 100 spins from my first test.

because strike rate is so good, both drazen_cro and hermes progression method may have merit, but I have to still personally try them so I leave this in your capable hands.
and

[buffalowizard]

You're probably both right, and I'm wrong. It's just the progression clothdog uses (1,3,9)
is the one used for 24 numbers so it may be a double dozen bet.


I suppose we have to wait for CD to comeback and clarify

[Drazen]

Anyway this baby strikes good. With good progression this can be dangerous for roulette i think 

Regards
                Drazen