• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

What is chaos theory and does it exist "parameters" that change the average comm

Started by ego, Jun 01, 04:43 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

ego

What is chaos theory and does it exist "parameters" that change the average common probability.

This I find amusing.

The visual ballistic and bias expert Snowman elaborate about the previous five.
He say that the previous five numbers with no repeat reduce the house edge to certain degree - even if the house edge remain negative and we playing three attempts.

Here is a chart that show us the hit ratio at frequencies 6, 7, 8, is hovering around 500.
And all the others around 400 and below.

First repeat appeared at spin 2 Frequencies 158
First repeat appeared at spin 3 Frequencies 249
First repeat appeared at spin 4 Frequencies 371
First repeat appeared at spin 5 Frequencies 459
First repeat appeared at spin 6 Frequencies 546 <<<
First repeat appeared at spin 7 Frequencies 524 <<<
First repeat appeared at spin 8 Frequencies 531 <<<
First repeat appeared at spin 9 Frequencies 478

Now if we would play even money bets and play with the previous five reads with no repeat it would be a better option then playing black - against the sequence of previous five - this is one extra parameter.

Just run for fun some short samples.
13 attacks where 8 include one repeat and all won.

1
5
4
7
8 Previous 5 Low

3 Won
22
35

- - -

20
29
33
31
26 Previous 5 High

7  Loss
32 Won
26 Repeat

- - -

28
19
34
24
25 Previous 5 High

32 Won
1
24 Repeat

- - -

26
28
31
27
23 Previous 5 High

20 Won
25
26 Repeat

- - -

35
20
29
32
23 Previous 5 High

3  Loss
27 Won
17

- - -

28
33
20
35
29 Previous 5 High

30 Won
1
15

- - -

9
11
1
7
18 Previous 5 Low

11 Won Repeat
9  Repeat
9  Repeat

- - -

30
24
26
21
27 Previous 5 High

28 Won
25
32

- - -

22
29
30
19
25 Previous 5 High

11 Loss
14 Loss
21 Won

- - -

24
28
21
22
31 Previous 5 High

0  Loss
36 Won
32

- - -

22
27
20
25
29 Previous 5 High

27 Won Repeat
11
23

- - -

24
23
33
22
31 Previous 5 High

29 Won
36
35

- - -

10
17
12
5
18 Previous 5 Low

17 Won Repeat
20
31

That would mean that first we have to lose 5 selection with none of the previos 5 go back to back depending on what even money position we use.
Next we would also have to lose 5 selection with no repeat.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

albertojonas

that's playing agains the fail of the most common events
very well done

thx again EGO

-