even chance betting

[marivo]

More information available here.

Where?

[Halba1]

Where?

soz. the forum was slow so the link didn't add.

link:://loothog.com/Systems/AAIC.html

[marivo]

Thanks.

[Red Nickels]

For example, look at it like this, we know that an even chance bet can go 25 times the same, so it would be better to start betting once you see 25 and not on the first bet. But this could take forever, hence the reason to have more systems to play at the same time.

............. I was reading your system with interest till I read what you wrote above which is, hmm... how can I say this politely... hmm let's just say "mis-guided thinking."  you would gain no advantage whatsoever making any kind of bet after 25 in a row of anything.  if you were waiting for 25 in a row of something than you would miss all the bets you could have won before this event happened, and you would lose to all the sequences greater than 25 in a row, the total of which would be statistically equal to the amount of times 25 in a row would hit.  ofcourse if you were to bet that the next sequence will be 25 in a row of something or not, that is a different story and the chance for 25 in a row of something to occur next will indeed be small, but after it has already happened the chance for the next outcome remains the same as it ever was.  that being said your system may still be a good one.

[mimoto]

All i know is that when you are waiting for a trigger as most systems, you are waiting for something to happen or not to happen, I dont quite understand your comments, maybe i did not explain correctly.

What are triggers then?

If on bet 1, i start to bet red and i get 25 blacks in a row, i am in the shit.
If while playing i see 25 reds  in a row i would bet black as i have only ever seen 25 in a row, so i have saved 25 bets.  Have you ever seen 50 in a row?

The above is only an example of what i mean and i dont play like this.

Just test my system and you will see its better than a lot on  here and its making me good money. And very easy to play

1100 readers and no one yet telling me its crap and that they have lost there bankroll.

I think that simply puts people off as we all think we have to be complex to beat roulette.

Test it and tell me where it fails please.

Mimoto

[Halba1]

............. I was reading your system with interest till I read what you wrote above which is, hmm... how can I say this politely... hmm let's just say "mis-guided thinking."  you would gain no advantage whatsoever making any kind of bet after 25 in a row of anything.  if you were waiting for 25 in a row of something than you would miss all the bets you could have won before this event happened, and you would lose to all the sequences greater than 25 in a row, the total of which would be statistically equal to the amount of times 25 in a row would hit.  ofcourse if you were to bet that the next sequence will be 25 in a row of something or not, that is a different story and the chance for 25 in a row of something to occur next will indeed be small, but after it has already happened the chance for the next outcome remains the same as it ever was.  that being said your system may still be a good one.

red nickels. either You are in it to win it as they say. worrying about 25 in a row ain't gonna help. average I normally see max 12 in a row anyway.

personally i would only play mimotos way after we see a a failure of 2 triggers then go in.

[Red Nickels]

red nickels. either You are in it to win it as they say. worrying about 25 in a row ain't gonna help. average I normally see max 12 in a row anyway.

personally I would only play mimotos way after we see a a failure of 2 triggers then go in.

........... you totally and completely did not get what I was saying and the reason I was saying it.  nevermind, whatever.  it seems I read here another statement that the zeroes "have no effect" on this system.  and why is that, might I ask?

[beretta28]

I'm sorry mimoto,but your system is nonsense.
1)Why does zero not affect it?I really don't understand!
2)Change every three spins "Same,Opposite"etc doesn't modify at all  the negative mathematical expectancy of each bet
3)Waiting for a trigger before betting is a very old and useless way of playing,related to the gambling fallacy
4)I was curious and I tested your method after a "virtual" fail.as you suggest!
A disaster!! I've lost several time and win very often,but the balance was very negative.

Really do you think that your very simple method can defeat roulette,after 2 centuries of studies, tests,computer trials,etc
I would like to be a dreamer, like you are!

[albertojonas]

why not put a percentage on the green lady?

[mimoto]

I'm sorry mimoto,but your system is nonsense.
1)Why does zero not affect it?I really don't understand!
2)Change every three spins "Same,Opposite"etc doesn't modify at all  the negative mathematical expectancy of each bet
3)Waiting for a trigger before betting is a very old and useless way of playing,related to the gambling fallacy
4)I was curious and I tested your method after a "virtual" fail.as you suggest!
A disaster!! I've lost several time and win very often,but the balance was very negative.

Really do you think that your very simple method can defeat roulette,after 2 centuries of studies, tests,computer trials,etc
I would like to be a dreamer, like you are!

I would like to be a dreamer, like you are!
I bet you would, with money in my pocket made from using this.
I have read all your post mr glass half empty, maybe you should change your name to MR POSITIVE!!!!

[mimoto]

Yes, sure why not if that makes us all happy, I know that you know this game.
ALL the best to you. whats up with beretta?

[Halba1]

system works, if played exactly as mimoto said. you just need progression, you need to play for each line.

its just like pattern 4. confusing random.