CODE 4

[marivo]

Originally these are 2 numbers. If you take it as 1 number then it's CODE 4 your way. No problem. Just to be clear.

[Robeenhuut]

CODE 4 with reverse switch
=====================
Record lines in matrix 4.

Alternate results:
doz/col/doz/col
col/doz/col/doz

Stop at any winner per line.

I prefer the progression 1-1,2-2,3-3,4-4,5-5.....etc
Up 1 on a loss; down 1 on a win
Reset to 1-1 when level or ahead.

(can use standard code4 progression instead; 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27)

I would advise for better advantage to play only on NOZERO roulette

2c2c --first line results
b3c2 --L-2, L-4, w+3   -3 (reduce to 2-2)
1b3b --w+2                -1 (reduce to 1-1)
a3a3 --L-2, w+2           -1
1b2a --L-2, w+2           -1
b2c1 --w+1                 +0
3c1b --w+1                 +1
a1c3 --w+1                 +2
2b2c --w+1                 +3
b1a1 --L-2, w+2          +3
2a1a --L-2, w+2          +3
a1a1 --w+1                 +4
2b1b --w+1                 +5
a3a1 --w+1                 +6
3b2c --w+1                 +7
a1a3 --w+1                 +8
3a2b --w+1                 +9
c2b1 --L-2,w+2            +9
2a3c --w+1                 +10

+10u in 76 spins.


Explanation
========
2c2c
b3c2
The first bet is 1u on both COLUMN 1 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 2) The bet lost
The second bet is 2u on both DOZEN 1 & 2  (opposite to column result c) The bet lost
The third bet is 3u on both COLUMN 1 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 2) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
The first bet is 2u on DOZEN 1 & 3 (opposite to column result b) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
a3a3
The first bet is 1u on COLUMN 2 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 1) The bet lost
The second bet is 2u on DOZEN 1 & 3 (opposite to column result b) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
a3a3
1b2a
The first bet is 1u on DOZEN 2 & 3 (opposite to column result a) The bet lost
The second bet is 2u on COLUMN 1 & 2 (opposite to dozen result 3) The bet won STOP

2c2c
b3c2
1b3b
a3a3
1b2a
b2c1
The first bet is 1u on COLUMN 2 & 3 (opposite to dozen result 1) The bet won STOP

etc..etc..

If playing standard code4 progression the result is +18u.
1 won at level 3
5 won at level 2
12 won at level 1
There was no level 4 bet required.

Interesting  - and maybe with HIT AND RUN???

Cheers,
A.

Hi Atlantis

Very interesting new take    . Alternating dz & col. I will try it @ PP Slingshot. Less $$$ consuming prog. Have u played it more?   

[atlantis]

Very interesting new take    . Alternating dz & col. I will try it @ PP Slingshot. Less $$$ consuming prog. Have you played it more?

Hi Robeenhuut,

I played a continuous session of 248 spins with REVERSE CODE 4 which meant I played 61 lines...

41 won on bet 1
12 won on bet 2
7 won on bet 3
1 LOST on bet 4

The one losing line cost me -2, -4, -6 and -8 = total of -20units. That happened on the 38th game (line) from commencement of play. At the time of the 4-loss I was +25units so at that point in the session I was reduced to +5units.

I continued play from the 5-5 level. The bets did eventually rise to 11-11 due to the circumstances that occurred but at the 50th game I had managed to return to +25units at which point I lowered bets to 1-1 and from thence on increased the profit to +30units at the 61st game.

In this session I did not reduce the progression at any stage until I was level or ahead of any previous bankroll high.

However as JL will no doubt tell you.. I do not think continuous play is the safest option at all -- I am only just testing it that way to see how it performs.
If playing standard code4 progression there would have been a full one line loss (80u) incurred.

A.

[shermantor]

Hi guys.

Just a thought dunno if it would work.  What about betting for the same pattern to appear?  So for example i had, on pp slingshot, first numbers

1B1B numbers 8,5,1,36
xxxx
xxxx
1B1C numbers 12,11,2,12

And william first numbers

1C1A
xxxx
xxxx
2B2A

So instead of betting opposite spending 2 units.  What about betting 1 unit on at least 1 item appearing again?  Progression 1,1,2,3 ?  7 unit loss if lose. +2 or +1 if win.  Or 1,2,4,8.  15 units loss or a +2 win?

Dunno if anyone could check their winnings and see if this is any good or not?

[ZeroBlue]

it has exactly the same odds-

[shermantor]

ok cheers for speedy reply zeroblue!!

[Robeenhuut]

Hi Robeenhuut,

I played a continuous session of 248 spins with REVERSE CODE 4 which meant I played 61 lines...

41 won on bet 1
12 won on bet 2
7 won on bet 3
1 LOST on bet 4

The one losing line cost me -2, -4, -6 and -8 = total of -20units. That happened on the 38th game (line) from commencement of play. At the time of the 4-loss I was +25units so at that point in the session I was reduced to +5units.

I continued play from the 5-5 level. The bets did eventually rise to 11-11 due to the circumstances that occurred but at the 50th game I had managed to return to +25units at which point I lowered bets to 1-1 and from thence on increased the profit to +30units at the 61st game.

In this session I did not reduce the progression at any stage until I was level or ahead of any previous bankroll high.

However as JL will no doubt tell you.. I do not think continuous play is the safest option at all -- I am only just testing it that way to see how it performs.
If playing standard code4 progression there would have been a full one line loss (80u) incurred.

A.

Hi Atlantis

I played 11 games on PP Slingshot and managed to win 6 units. I wouldnt play it continuously. Get on hot streak and get out. But this thing looks pretty stable and u can recover fairly quickly.

[atlantis]

I played 11 games on PP Slingshot and managed to win 6 units. I wouldnt play it continuously. Get on hot streak and get out. But this thing looks pretty stable and You can recover fairly quickly.

Hi Robeenhuut,

Thanks. Yes probably a good idea hit'n'run tactics. Here is something to check out and try!

This is my REVERSE CODE 4 session result played slightly differently.

Here I use a revised 3 step progression per line (no fourth bet made):

1st Step: 1-1
2nd Step: 1-1
3rd Step: 3-3

(total 10u at risk)


2a3a - first line
a2a2  w    +1
2c1c  w    +2
b2a2  w    +1
3b3a  w    +2
a2c3  w    +3
3c2b  w    +4
c1c2  w    +3
3b3a  w    +2
a1b2  w    +3
1b1a  w    +2
b1a3  w    +3
3b3c  w    +4
c2a2  w    +3
1c3a  w    +4
c3a3  w    +5
1b3b  w    +6
c3b2  w    +7
2b1b  w    +8
c2a1  w    +9
2b3a  w    +10
b1b3  w    +9
3a2c  w    +10
c1a3  w    +9
2b1a  w    +10
a1b3  w    +11
2a2a  w    +12
b1c2  w    +11
2c3b  w    +10
a1b3  w    +11
3b1a  w    +12
b1c2  w    +13
2a2a  w    +12
b3c3  w    +11
3a3a  w    +12
b1a2  w    +13
1c2c  w    +14
a3b3  L     +4 *3 step loss
3c2b  w     +5
a3b2  w     +6
3b2a  w     +7
c2c1  w     +6
3a3c  w     +5
a2b2  w     +6
2a1b  w     +7
b2a3  w     +6
2b3c  w     +5
a2b1  w     +6
3c3c  w     +7
1a1c  w     +8
b1c3  w     +9
2c3c  w     +8
b2c3  w     +7
3b3c  w     +8
c2a2  w     +7
2c1c  w     +8
a3c2  w     +9
3b2c  w     +10
a3a1  w     +11   
1a1b  w     +10     
b3a2  w     +11

+11 in 61 games. Highest bet 3-3.

I tried to take advantage of fact that MOST wins are on bet 1.  A win on bet 2 or bet 3 produces a result of -1.
A three step loss results in -10 (happened only once above in game 38)
So hopefully get more +1's than -1's.  Played HIT ' n ' RUN could be good!



A.

[Robeenhuut]

Hi Robeenhuut,

Thanks. Yes probably a good idea hit'n'run tactics. Here is something to check out and try!

This is my REVERSE CODE 4 session result played slightly differently.

Here I use a revised 3 step progression per line (no fourth bet made):

1st Step: 1-1
2nd Step: 1-1
3rd Step: 3-3

(total 10u at risk)


2a3a - first line
a2a2  w    +1
2c1c  w    +2
b2a2  w    +1
3b3a  w    +2
a2c3  w    +3
3c2b  w    +4
c1c2  w    +3
3b3a  w    +2
a1b2  w    +3
1b1a  w    +2
b1a3  w    +3
3b3c  w    +4
c2a2  w    +3
1c3a  w    +4
c3a3  w    +5
1b3b  w    +6
c3b2  w    +7
2b1b  w    +8
c2a1  w    +9
2b3a  w    +10
b1b3  w    +9
3a2c  w    +10
c1a3  w    +9
2b1a  w    +10
a1b3  w    +11
2a2a  w    +12
b1c2  w    +11
2c3b  w    +10
a1b3  w    +11
3b1a  w    +12
b1c2  w    +13
2a2a  w    +12
b3c3  w    +11
3a3a  w    +12
b1a2  w    +13
1c2c  w    +14
a3b3  L     +4 *3 step loss
3c2b  w     +5
a3b2  w     +6
3b2a  w     +7
c2c1  w     +6
3a3c  w     +5
a2b2  w     +6
2a1b  w     +7
b2a3  w     +6
2b3c  w     +5
a2b1  w     +6
3c3c  w     +7
1a1c  w     +8
b1c3  w     +9
2c3c  w     +8
b2c3  w     +7
3b3c  w     +8
c2a2  w     +7
2c1c  w     +8
a3c2  w     +9
3b2c  w     +10
a3a1  w     +11   
1a1b  w     +10     
b3a2  w     +11

+11 in 61 games. Highest bet 3-3.

I tried to take advantage of fact that MOST wins are on bet 1.  A win on bet 2 or bet 3 produces a result of -1.
A three step loss results in -10 (happened only once above in game 38)
So hopefully get more +1's than -1's.  Played HIT ' n ' RUN could be good!



A.

Yeah Atlantis

U get most of the hits on the first step so in my opinion it would make a perfect sense
2 come up with progression that would maintain sort of status quo in later stages.
U make yr money in 1 step and try not 2 loose it in further steps. i dont like 1,3,9,27.
Yr prog is better even 4 sort of continuous play (10-20 games)

[atlantis]

U get most of the hits on the first step so in my opinion it would make a perfect sense
2 come up with progression that would maintain sort of status quo in later stages.
U make yr money in 1 step and try not 2 lose it in further steps. I don't like 1,3,9,27.
Yr prog is better even 4 sort of continuous play (10-20 games)

If playing same hit'n'run style as JohnLegend and going for 2 wins per session opposing 1st line with 4th (original) then don't see why "Reverse Code 4" cannot be equally as successful using the existing 1.3.9.27 staking plan...
Or maybe you can play 1 session using original then 1 session with reverse method.
A.

[akuuka]

Originally these are 2 numbers. If you take it as 1 number then it's CODE 4 your way. No problem. Just to be clear

Ok then. That mean that i'm mistakes when to figure out the rule of Code 4 System. Sorry.   I will fixit my way of using Code 4. Thank's for your advice.


Regard
akuuka

[marivo]

Hi guys.

Just a thought dunno if it would work.  What about betting for the same pattern to appear?  So for example I had, on pp slingshot, first numbers

1B1B numbers 8,5,1,36
xxxx
xxxx
1B1C numbers 12,11,2,12

And william first numbers

1C1A
xxxx
xxxx
2B2A

So instead of betting opposite spending 2 units.  What about betting 1 unit on at least 1 item appearing again?  Progression 1,1,2,3 ?  7 unit loss if lose. +2 or +1 if win.  Or 1,2,4,8.  15 units loss or a +2 win?

Dunno if anyone could check their winnings and see if this is any good or not?

it has exactly the same odds-

Is that true?

[Johnlegend]

If playing same hit'n'run style as JohnLegend and going for 2 wins per session opposing 1st line with 4th (original) then don't see why "Reverse Code 4" cannot be equally as successful using the existing 1.3.9.27 staking plan...
Or maybe you can play 1 session using original then 1 session with reverse method.
A.

Atlantis is at it again, I love the way you morph a method my friend. Remember MATRIX VERTICAL 5?? Well its big brother says hello on Sunday. Yes you and Twister still have a stake in possibly the greatest of them ALL. Stay tuned...

[ZeroBlue]

Is that true?

Yes it is

[Johnlegend]

CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE FOR 09/07/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 440

TOTAL GAMES WON 440

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 880 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 221

STEP 2 WINS 152

STEP 3 WINS 59

STEP 4 WINS 8

Taken to the edge only once in the last 40 games. I am just stunned by this method. Its combination of strikerate and relatively fast turnover. Makes it one of the greatest methods ever. I can hear people say but gee JL its an 80 unit buy in. that's only a lot if your strikerate is potentially small under 200 average expectancy. When you have a method that could/can break the magical 1000 barrier for consecutive wins. 80 units doesn't seem like a lot anymore. My advice to newbies is build up your bankrol playing methods with a smaller buy in, if you don't have a lot to play with. But once you have a few 100 units GET ON THIS ONE.

Play it ONLY two games at a time, (I HAVE 6 RECORDED LOSING GAMES, BUT THEY ALL FALL OUTSIDE OF MY SESSIONS) if you want similar results to mine. And you will soon see what all the fuss is about. Okay with methods like PATTERN BREAKER & DIVIDE AND CONQUER. We only have about one tenth of the risk on the line. But we know we will lose around 1 game out of every 11--15 played. A method like CODE 4 simply doesn't comply with stats. It is capable of going off the chart. I have never had a strikerate of even 500 with any method. I have paper tested methods that showed me its possible, but I have never enjoyed a streak like that in real play. And here I am now with CODE 4 and the one that gets released sunday. Both capable of winning so many times. You simply do not know when they will lose. Play on... Next update at the 500 game milestone.