CODE 4

[Johnlegend]

Hello JL

i think that you missed my point. If you played 2500 games then its at least 30000 spins? i just don't see that in independent events which are 4 steps of progression you get such a different results. It seems that the deeper you go into progression your W/L ratio increases. On average it should be around 67% (2/3) but suddenly in 2 last steps you get around 90%. Try to bet against 1 DZ or CL in large number of games and your numbers should be around 67%.  I just don't see how you can get such a large fluctuations.  Only other explanation would be that in the next 2500 games the numbers will gradually even out....

Regards

Robeenhut it doesn't work like that with hit and run this is the value of this application. When you isolate a small number of games SOMETHING HAPPENS, THAT doesn't HAPPEN WHEN YOU PLAY CONTINUOSLY. There I have said it, your winning ratio simply doesn't pan out the way it does continually. You are fighting with what the maths fraternity tells you SHOULD HAPPEN. Like I have been sayig from the getgo, KNOWING SOMETHING CAN/WILL HAPPEN. And meeting it in REAL-TIME PLAY. Are two very different things.

They have to have rigid explanations for everything. Or they get jittery and worried that they are not in control. The truth is they never were. Random doesn't hold allegence to math. Its ebb and flow is as unpredictable as the weather. that's why the smart know no mechanical method can tame it COMPLETELY. But that doesn't mean a good method cannot be profitable, just not invincible. And that's where I stand with CODE 4 and the others.

To summarize what I am saying, yes I know what you are supposed to get given the paper odds of betting against a single dozen or column. But with Hit and Run and the constanst stop and start you are defying those paper odds. And you are hitting a bigger span of winners on THE FIRST 2 STEPS of the 4 step progression. That is why I endorse and play no more than 4 games a session. It simply works wonders.

[Johnlegend]

Sorry i meant what chip are you using 1 dollar??

No Seykid31 I live in London UK. We play for the POUND. A unit for me is worth 2 British pounds. So for CODE 4 I am playing for 4 British pounds a game.

[seykid31]

No Seykid31 I live in London UK. We play for the POUND. A unit for me is worth 2 British pounds. So for CODE 4 I am playing for 4 British pounds a game.

ok.So that means if you are playing 3 systems a year.You are averaging 18 000 pounds a year with roulette.Which is good i guess.

[rolf-harris]

Great news for all you Code4 fans out there....
Now you can save yourselves a lot of time spent tracking results before betting..
Just go along to random.org, enter in parameters between 1 and 36 , press a button and the guys behind the scenes there will give you a number to bet against with this system.
They must be quite clever boffins there because they have enabled me to get very similar results to those I was getting using the original Code4 technique of logging 12 spins first.
Of course, you can still play dozens and columns,  hit and run or whatever you like...but the bottom line is the results will be the same....

[Johnlegend]

ok.So that means if you are playing 3 systems a year.You are averaging 18 000 pounds a year with roulette.Which is good i guess.

Hello Seykid. I play 5 methods in any one calendar day. I have averaged 30k over the last year. But recently I am pushing harder. Methods like CODE 4 now have my absolute confidence. So I can risk a lot more than I normally would. Pattern Breaker too has extraordinary CONSISTENCY. And defies all the maths fraternity say is its due over the long haul.

Hit and run does not abide by text book math and probability. It really doesn't that's why I endorse it so ardently. If there were no benefit to its application I would say nothing. I played straight for a decade and everything the so-called experts said would happen HAPPENED. And I lost thousands.
Once I realized that cutting off randoms air supply LONGEVITY was the only way to get close or BEYOND the paper odds of a good method. I haven't looked back.

The PAPER ODDS for PATTERN BREAKER are 7/1. Played HIT AND RUN I have NEVER dropped below 10/1 And that's before I even apply smart money management.

The PAPER ODDS for a fast method DIVIDE AND CONQUER are 8/1. Played HIT AND RUN again 10/1 is the worst I have found.

Then CODE 4, Paper odds 80/1. Played hit and run I have never fallen below 300/1. And those numbers are only possible because when Random is doing its worst you are extremely unlikely to be caught in the eye of the storm. You simply aren't there the vast majority of the time.

[Johnlegend]

Great news for all you Code4 fans out there....
Now you can save yourselves a lot of time spent tracking results before betting..
Just go along to random.org, enter in parameters between 1 and 36 , press a button and the guys behind the scenes there will give you a number to bet against with this system.
They must be quite clever boffins there because they have enabled me to get very similar results to those I was getting using the original Code4 technique of logging 12 spins first.
Of course, you can still play dozens and columns,  hit and run or whatever you like...but the bottom line is the results will be the same....

Negative Rolf, not on a real wheel they wont.

[Proofreaders2000]

"I have averaged 30k over the last year."--John Legend

That's quite an accomplishment.  Congratulations 

One more note: It seems the more successful players play at walk-in casinos, not online.
(I think that's my problem).

[flukey luke]

It seems the more successful players play at walk-in casinos, not online.
(I think that's my problem)

Dublinbet is one of the few online casinos that is also an actual B+M casino.

Fairway casino now have a link to another live B+M casino in Ireland. (It is not DB, I think it's called the sporting emporium club.)

If you have to compromise and play online, it makes sense to find a way to play at one of these 'live' casinos. Anything else and you are pretty much a hostage to fortune.

[Wally Gator]

Methods like CODE 4 now have my absolute confidence.
Pattern Breaker too has extraordinary CONSISTENCY.
Then CODE 4

While I won't disclose dollar amounts, I can confidently say that I've been using the above 3 methods now for about 6 months with simply incredible results.  It also means my brain was engaged while using the methods.  And, I don't say that jokingly.  Anyone can play any of these strategies into the ground and claim a negative result.   If that's your goal, my strongest recommendation is that you don't start as failure would be inevitable.  However, the opposite is true for those looking to use these tools for calculated investment.

[seykid31]

Congratulations JL quite an accomplishment i will say.All the best for this year.

[downthehatch]

[quote author=Johnlegend link=topic=5848.msg73976#msg73976 date=1325100248]
I risk 160 units total on a game Seykid31 to win 2 units. So I.E
2---2------6---6-----18---18-----54---54 = Total risk 160 units.

In the beginning I experimented with staking. I was thinking of using multiple levels after a loss. But the strikerate is so strong with CODE 4 this wasn't necessary. Like it would be with a fast turnover method like DIVIDE AND CONQUER. That is when clever money management and disciplined play really pay off. And you make much faster progress. Than you would just using one staking level as I do for CODE 4 and VERTICAL 8.

One of the biggest mis-conceptions ingrained in roulette players brains, is this notion that a method MUST turn a profit purely on bet selection to level stakes to be worth a hoot. And this is one of the reasons few get anywhere with this game. The essential elements to a winning method are A, a method with a good strikerate. B, Smart use of Money Management. C, Disciplined Mindset.

To stick to the task, day in and day out. And its the third essential that remains the stumbling block for virtually every player of this game. It took me several years to clinch that resolve and iron will to stay with what works

. Most will never have it. They will be system hopping their whole lives through. And never getting anywhere.
[/quote]

Hi Mr JL

I'm afraid you've just described me! however Code 4 and your results have given me fresh hope i might one day win at roulette (notwithstanding lucky arbitrary wins that i mentioned in another thread)

as you are the main spokesman for Code 4 i would be very grateful if you could clarify certain points
as the many additions to this thread have confused me some what!

So i sit down at the laptop and bring up paddy power slingshot roulette

Basic play is this correct?

1. I note the previous 12 spins or chart 12 new spins. particularly dozens and columns

2.  this grid is produced for example

    1A1C  (line 1)
    3A2B  (line 2)
    1C2C  (line 3)

3. So now i bet against the 1st line appearing using 1,3,9,27 prog. or 2,6,18,54

  so i bet doz's 2&3, if lose then bet cols B&C etc

4.  ok I win on the 2nd bet Col B

5. Ok now I note the 3rd and 4th spin and this becomes the 'new' line 4.

      1B3A


6. So now we have 3 lines (the old line 1 is crossed off)

7. So now do i bet against what is now the new line 1 = 3A2B ?

I win again and using your hit and run technique, i now retire for awhile and then
later play 'Game 2' again hopefully winning twice, then later game 3 etc?

8. Re 'continuous' play (to a degree)
    if i then changed to another live table at pad pow would this compromise the 'hit and run'              principle?, say i won again, could i then log on to Victor chandler or any live casino and play the two games, i.e bouncing from one live table to another?

9. re Code 4 itself, would it be even less risky playing a sort of Code 6

i.e. you chart 12 spins, 2 lines, dozs and cols again

     1B1C2C
     2C3A3A

You then bet against the 1st line repeating using 1,3,9,27,81, 243 or some other prog?

wouldn't it be more unlikely for that pattern to appear?

my apologies if this all sounds a bit 'simple' but i seem to be a bit dyslexic trying to
understand roulette systems on paper so to speak

anyhoo thanks for your input and congrats on tremendous results

Cheer Dth

[downthehatch]

Hi sorry further question re Code 4

re Zero when charting spins

say i have   

   1C2B
   3A3A
   1 and then zero appears in the next 3 spins do, i simply abandon that individual line and chart a new third line?

  or abandon the all the spins and start afresh, charting a new set of 12?


also previous posters have mentioned betting on zero particularly if the line goes to the third or fourth spin? what do you recommend

Cheers Dth

[THECATT]

Hows the fIgures looking JL?? 

[THECATT]

Wow what a read, this is the best system i have ever come across ( hit and run). Congrats. Just one question, is there any disadvantage to spin 4 spins then start the code 4? so you are betting that the code does not come out straight after each other, cheers

[Amazin]

Ok, I still have lot to read but I have few questions.

Would it be better if we just write out all the possible combinations like a chart then just randomly select one to bet against?

What if we just bet the next combination insead after a loss?