• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

CODE 4

Started by amk, Jun 08, 03:15 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

nottophammer

with 60 pages to look at,was +1/-1 ever used
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

SamNL

Quote from: nottophammer on Apr 08, 06:04 AM 2015
with 60 pages to look at,was +1/-1 ever used
No, only a Marty has been used with this.

Rewster88

I think that code 4 was on the bot/system tester program dont know the name anymore. But i remember no system past 2000 spins in plus.

nottophammer

Sam

is it worth a look +1/-1,

How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

bleep24

I have said it before and I will say it again.  Look at old systems before looking at new.  There are some nuggets amongst them.  I had completely forgotten about CODE 4 but reminded in a recent posting.  CODE 4 (and its spin offs   -  haha) are some very powerful methods (ie: winning ones)

I play my own twist (though given the idea in   CODE 4 postings)   I am playing using dozens/columns.  This way works because of the very high hit rate on 1st spin.   I am only betting once (against previous dozen in matrix line DIRECTLY above) win or lose virtual bet next 3 spins.  Progression   1 1  3 3  9 9 etc. or whatever.
Very little waiting or tracking.  You could play one of the other lines at.the same time but keep separate banks  If you did it would be:  (say that you chose spin 3. Also dozens.   This is vertical betting.    2 separate series of bets if you want more opportunities to play (and have a bigger bank)      This has worked up to now on limited testing.
Bet    No Bet     Bet    No Bet

Good luck,     Brian         



bleep24

Also to look at is a post by Atlantis in code 4.  This is played on EC`s.   Progression is not steep (or you could use your own favourite one)
As in my last post I am playing vertically.     (on 2 choices)  so    BET    NO BET   BET    NO BET    I am playing for repeaters.

The brave could play all 4 (separate banks)       
Looks very promising.
Brian

nottophammer

Bleep just now on MPR
22,07,36,17
25,25,11,06
11,03,09,25
21,10,30,29
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

sentinel3

Quote from: nottophammer on Dec 19, 10:53 AM 2017
Bleep just now on MPR
22,07,36,17
25,25,11,06
11,03,09,25
21,10,30,29

These systems inspired by John Legend are among the best ive ever seen. I have been playing his pattern breaker for the last 3 months with some excellent results. This is a summary of how its gone for me so far.

GAMES PLAYED 350
GAMES WON 323
GAMES LOST 27

STARTING BANK 200
CURRENT BANK 361

LONGEST WINNING STREAK 25 GAMES
LONGEST LOSING STREAK 1

LONGEST WINNING STREAK FOR THE FIRST GAME OF THE DAY. 36 GAMES.

There alot of potential here with this simple but effective system. Only exposing 7 units a game. I havent lost two games in a row ever.

And the first game I play has the best performance rate. Producing many long winning streaks. 36 being the best so far.

bleep24

Hi Notto,
Do not know why you have posted those few results.   Is it to do with current systems?      (Dozens/columns - EC`s)

Just to state how perverse some results can be.  I looked at Hermes 6 x 6 D/S method.  He said it had not lost in 9 months and I spun a first 18 numbers and lo and behold, a loss.

Good luck everyone and a enjoyable Christmas to you,
Brian

bleep24

Hi Sentinel,
Good news.  Well done on those results.  Just confirms my faith in both methods.  I do prefer EC`s as progression is not as heavy and there are lots of different ones that can be applied to this.

This time next year Rodney we`ll all be millionaires!!!   (If you have not seen UK TV programme you will not understand this)

Just been in USA for nearly 5 weeks and TV there is mainly dross, and adverts every 10 minutes.   aargh!!!!

Brian 

sentinel3

Quote from: bleep24 on Dec 19, 03:08 PM 2017
Hi Sentinel,
Good news.  Well done on those results.  Just confirms my faith in both methods.  I do prefer EC`s as progression is not as heavy and there are lots of different ones that can be applied to this.

This time next year Rodney we`ll all be millionaires!!!   (If you have not seen UK TV programme you will not understand this)

Just been in USA for nearly 5 weeks and TV there is mainly dross, and adverts every 10 minutes.   aargh!!!!

Brian
Hi bleep24

Lol yes I know of fools & horses. Im from Devon in the UK. I agree the smaller risk makes it an attractive option. And every time I lose. I just double stakes on the very next game. For a faster recovery. I only play red and black which seems to be very stable. Might be because of the layout on the wheel. CODE 4 looks good. And I may give it a try if my bank gets to around 500.

The progression is quite heavy. But if it makes profit who can argue?..

valvo

Hi Sentinel, are you playing that the 8th pattern will appear? If not which PB are you playing?

sentinel3

Quote from: valvo on Dec 21, 07:27 AM 2017
Hi Sentinel, are you playing that the 8th pattern will appear? If not which PB are you playing?
Hi Valvo

No im playing against the 8th pattern appearing as in the original system.

If I was betting for the pattern I would have lost a lot. Right now my first bet of the day has gone 26 days no loss.

Since I started playing in September. Ive had a streak of 36 days without losing the first game.

I typically play 5 games most days. And most of my losses come on the 3--5 games. Thats something to think about.

Ive tried alot of systems in my time. And for just 7 units at risk. Never seen anything as good as pattern breaker.

Im 345 and 28 in wins and losses as I write this. This system is powerful. And a cheap buy in.

I cannot see this ever going to negative numbers. I already have over 24 times my standard progression. This ones a winner for sure.

That JL was a clever dude.j

valvo

If you lose do you go into recovery or stay at the 1 2 4 ?

sentinel3

Quote from: valvo on Dec 21, 01:47 PM 2017
If you lose do you go into recovery or stay at the 1 2 4 ?
Hi again valvo. What I do is double stakes for 1 game only straight after a loss. Ive never lost two straight games. Im in no doubt it will happen one day. But im 28/0 for double losses so far.

-