CODE 4

[vundarosa]

Hello Vundarosa,

JohnLegends results with HIT AND RUN speak for themself.....
Look at his systems, his updates and the story is clear.....
ZeorBlues own results are astonishing, has any ever heard of 1000 straight wins?
Ofcourse there was a trigger but HIT AND RUN was the key as well....

We can debate for or against but we are just spinning in circles....
All we can do is spin in the fashion we like and update the results.....

Don't give up on us JL........

----------------
amk, the results speak because of the way they are presented.
We have to compare aples to aples.....we should not be comparing winning streaks but units won in the same numbers of games played, when played the same way after a loss.

vundarosa

[Bayes]

If Fenders new system is going to put 2 fingers up to the nay sayers then why retract it or decide not to post it? afterall this new one is supposed to be for long term use not hit n run, which is the big problem here lately, hit n run seems like scared play to me, but that's another debate completely.

That's what I was wondering. JL seems to think I have some kind of agenda and will try to discredit him whatever he comes up with. That's not the case at all, if he weren't making such a big deal of the hit and run thing then I wouldn't be either, but it just seems to be a cornerstone of all his systems and according to him you ignore it at your peril. If it makes such a difference then what's the purpose of betting 'special' patterns which are designed to 'outsmart' random, why not just constantly bet red + hit 'n' run?

The key to winning is good MM and some indication of when a system is likely to 'turn'. It doesn't matter what it is, PATTERN 4, CODE 2 and all the rest are just as good as any other.

[ZeroBlue]

"HIT & RUN raises odds expectation."  -False.


No big deal. The systems presented still have merit.



Although i think they are no better than any Random Vs Random Method. - True


All systems betting against or in favor of any given pattern have the same hit ratio, because they are based on odds.


If we play one Single EC in patterns of 3 formations



You get 8 combinations


1. RRR
2. RBR
3. RRB
4. RBB
5. BBB
6. BRB
7. BBR
8. BRR

the odds are 1/8

that is set in stone.

You can try different triggers to achieve a better ratio:

Play after 2 consecutive losses. LL then bet and stop on a win.

Wait for a perfect state of balance between the patterns.

Play after a noticeable Ecart and try to catch a correction.

Correlate parameters and raise expectation.
[/size]
[/size]================================================================
[/size]
[/size]Any system should be tested flat bet as a measure of it's efficiency.
[/size]Only then we can make comparisons.
[/size]
[/size]
[/size]Zer0Blue
[/size]

[chrisbis]

@Zer0blue


What's all this "Stuff" mate? (See the attached below)


Was it something you trying to "Paste" into the message?

Or do we have a Forum Code problem Huston? 

[Bayes]

@ Zeroblue, agreed 100%, great post.

[ZeroBlue]

@Zer0blue


What's all this "Stuff" mate? (See the attached below)


Was it something you trying to "Paste" into the message?

Or do we have a Forum Code problem Huston? 

no. it happens several times to me. i usually edit the post, but this time it passed... :-(


i have to confess i prefer the older interface.


Cheers

[chrisbis]

Its early days yet with this one.


though, I know what you mean!


I think its because we were so familiar with it.  I loved it too.


But, hey- progress is progress, As the Turtle said to the Hare!!!  :LoL:

[ZeroBlue]

@chris


i miss the reveal window when posting.

[chrisbis]

@chris


i miss the reveal window when posting.

Its coming back.........


Along with a whole host of new ideas I thought up.


And that's the one beauty of this new "Skin", is that it allows Victor, our "In-House" coder, to play with the PHP code, and make up all sorts of new features.


I can now officially ' Let My Mind Wander'.......................he he!!


(just one thing to watch out for, friend, and this goes to ALL fellows posters viewing this message-
When you type the letter U within a message or PM, the Forum code, (at the moment- till its fixed), is deleting the very next letter/word/text after it, when it changes U into 'You'.
You have to edit it, via the Modify button function, and add your words back in again, or type the correct spelling in the first place!!)

[VLS]

Its coming back.........

[reveal]It came back! [/reveal]


Vic

[chrisbis]

Like it!!
(I think, to make it "Look" more- 'Savy', we could get rid of the (click to show/hide) instruction, and maybe just have it instructing, when the mouse moves over the "Reveal" link/feature?!


also........

U/You..............will U/You fix it please?


I'm using the "nobbc" prefix code to stop the auto changes.

[amk]

Hello EVERYONE,

Bayes:

"If it makes such a difference then what's the purpose of betting 'special' patterns which are designed to 'outsmart' random, why not just constantly bet red + hit 'n' run?"

Bayes, I think you just might have "summed" it up.....

ALMOST every method played HIT AN RUN can yield good results......

HIT AND RUN is the angle we are approaching the game.....

Perhaps math might meet it's equal......

[amk]

Bayes,

A profound discovery was made by Arthur, red and black are the ONLY even chance bets which are evenly distributed around the roulette wheel.......

H/L and E/O are divided around the wheel in a chaotic matter.....

Either way you look at it this effects the game....

RANDOM will have a different result for red and black versus H/L E/O..........

[donik7777]

Bayes the easiest thing to criticize, but you can give a system that I go tomorrow and start earning. I can tell you many thanks.

Johnlegend thank you for your hard work, you promised a new method for on Sundays,
when we can see.
Thanks again for your diligence.

[amk]

"HIT & RUN raises odds expectation."  -False.


No big deal. The systems presented still have merit.



Although i think they are no better than any Random Vs Random Method. - True


All systems betting against or in favor of any given pattern have the same hit ratio, because they are based on odds.


If we play one Single EC in patterns of 3 formations



You get 8 combinations


1. RRR
2. RBR
3. RRB
4. RBB
5. BBB
6. BRB
7. BBR
8. BRR

the odds are 1/8

that is set in stone.

You can try different triggers to achieve a better ratio:

Play after 2 consecutive losses. LL then bet and stop on a win.

Wait for a perfect state of balance between the patterns.

Play after a noticeable Ecart and try to catch a correction.

Correlate parameters and raise expectation.
[/size]
[/size]================================================================
[/size]
[/size]Any system should be tested flat bet as a measure of it's efficiency.
[/size]Only then we can make comparisons.
[/size]
[/size]
[/size]Zer0Blue
[/size]

Thanks ZeroBlue........

As I mentioned to Bayes, play ALMOST any method HIT AND RUN and it will yield go results.......