CODE 4

[Johnlegend]

Hi Johnlegend,
In post #19 by Gordonline there are 3700 spins Code 4 format (live wheel spins)
It’s 925 rows of code4. I am a little bit confused because if you check any raw for repeaters you can find up to 20 times the same raw. Ok.. Maybe an average would be like 10-12 rows â€" repeaters.
That means we are not going to be winners. What make you think that if you play 5 times per day it can reduce chances not to catch part of those loses? Maybe someone who fan of code 4 can reply if Johnlegend is busy
Thanks for your help

What makes me think is my results Slatan, think for a moment. If you have paper odds of 80/1 and you play 100 consecutive games would you expect to lose?

Now you play just two  games five times a day randomly. Who is more likely to catch a loss? don't get me wrong I've got seven losses recorded in my records. I just wasn't there when they happenned.

That is all the proof I need that hit and run is a superior application. If Id even been playing three games a session instead of TWO. I would have lost by now.

Playing two by two has given me fantastic results. You are missing potential losses playing that way, you really are.

I have been experimenting with a six step code for all three even chances for a total of 63 units risk. Now I am up to 93 CONSECUTIVE GAMES NO LOSS.

Imagine what will be possible playing two by two.

[marivo]

Combine that with XXVV's prog on D+C reversal bet and you've got a home run.

What exactly do you mean? Can you link it? Thanks

[topcat888]

wolfat, can I ask what progression you are using..?

CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE 22/07/11

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 560

TOTAL GAMES WON 560

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 1120 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 273

STEP 2 WINS 186

STEP 3 WINS 89

STEP 4 WINS 12

Mani tx to JL and other contributors.
I'd like to point out a thing: checking your stats I realized that, from the beginning, your strike rate on step 1 is around 50%; this is not so good for a 2 doz betting that should get ar. 66% on avg, ; BUUUT this is VEERY good for a single dozen betting that's hitting 50% instead regular 33% giving a huge advantage of 17% betting for a repeating pattern, at least on step 1 only.
Is there a flaw in my thinking?
comments are welcome

[vundarosa]

What makes me think is my results Slatan, think for a moment. If you have paper odds of 80/1 and you play 100 consecutive games would you expect to lose?

Now you play just two  games five times a day randomly. Who is more likely to catch a loss? don't get me wrong I've got seven losses recorded in my records. I just wasn't there when they happenned.

That is all the proof I need that hit and run is a superior application. If Id even been playing three games a session instead of TWO. I would have lost by now.

Playing two by two has given me fantastic results. You are missing potential losses playing that way, you really are.

I have been experimenting with a six step code for all three even chances for a total of 63 units risk. Now I am up to 93 CONSECUTIVE GAMES NO LOSS.

Imagine what will be possible playing two by two.

--------------------------
Hi JL,
I was looking sometime ago at betting the 3 ECs in a code 6 format. I was trying to do it flat bet and betting the line above it...I did not get good results.Now looking at my tests and betting the 4th line against the 1st in a code 6 format, its quite impressive how many win on the first step....maybe a different progression, with a lower risk, would still yeld good results

vundarosa

[Johnlegend]

--------------------------
Hi JL,
I was looking sometime ago at betting the 3 ECs in a code 6 format. I was trying to do it flat bet and betting the line above it...I did not get good results.Now looking at my tests and betting the 4th line against the 1st in a code 6 format, its quite impressive how many win on the first step....maybe a different progression, with a lower risk, would still yeld good results

vundarosa

No flat betting wont do it Vundarosa, I too have been testing the line above. But putting 63 units on the line. And in 105 consecutive games now.

Ive been taken to the sixth step twice. But the progression has survived. Its done better than code 4 over a similar 100 line sample with 17 units in hand.

I will play for a 500 line sample then draw my conclusions. I suspect already though played in my normal manner it will prove a world beater...

[vundarosa]

"I too have been testing the line above."

---------------

Does it do better than 4th line betting against the 1st?!

vundarosa

[Johnlegend]

"I too have been testing the line above."

---------------

Does it do better than 4th line betting against the 1st?!

vundarosa

Yes Vundarosa, thats what has suprised me, I can find 3 matches four lines apart after 120 lines but not a single match line under line.

And you can almost see a change coming, through my experience with MATRIX VERTICAL 5. The even chances 6 wide seldom go beyond 6 deep. ALL CHANGE...

[amk]

I know I am going against my principles and ONLY live wheel findings are in my eyes real......

However, 500 lines tested on random.org, 8 loses.......

Longest winning streak 150......

HIT AND RUN should be very interesting............

[Johnlegend]

I know I am going against my principles and ONLY live wheel findings are in my eyes real......

However, 500 lines tested on random.org, 8 loses.......

Longest winning streak 150......

HIT AND RUN should be very interesting............

Amk give me an example of a line as you got Random.org to play it. I have now played 145 lines no loss. Yes hit and run will do very nicely. Here is an example of how im playing.

HORLER
HERLOB-WIN STEP 2 as it was EVEN..

[Wally Gator]

What exactly do you mean? Can you link it? Thanks

@marivo:
Start here:  link:://rouletteforum.cc/general-discussion/whitticker-progression-for-dozens-and-columns/msg61876/#msg61876

[marivo]

@marivo:
Start here:  link:://rouletteforum.cc/general-discussion/Whittacker-progression-for-dozens-and-columns/msg61876/#msg61876

This is link to the list of topics.....anyway I understand you wanted to direct me to Whittacker Progression for Dozens and Columns. Is there a specific reply in this thread where I would find the rules for it or you meant I should read it all and try to understand it? And if so I assume you do understand it?

[wolfat]

wolfat, can I ask what progression you are using..?

No prog is neede 'cos you have a 50% hitting rate on dozen, anyway I love challenge prog applied to doz/col. I put 13 unit at risk to get 4-5  hitting 4 times everywhere in the session.

[marivo]

Is there a flaw in my thinking?

Not really.....except that the sample (number of games) is too small...agree?

[vundarosa]

I know I am going against my principles and ONLY live wheel findings are in my eyes real......

However, 500 lines tested on random.org, 8 loses.......

Longest winning streak 150......

HIT AND RUN should be very interesting............

-----------------

Tested 200 lines so far; found already 6 losses....


vundarosa

[amk]

Well, as I say JohnLegend random.org is not LIVE WHEEL results.........

At random.org the lines tested looked like this......

211212
221212

Keep in mind that there was no zero.....

Either way HIT AND RUN will look nice............