CODE 4

[atlantis]

Hi vunderosa,

Fantastic result! BUT, I'm afraid I cannot figure out how you've played it - are you playing vertical, horizontal or diagonal. Why have you highlighted certain lines?
Anyway congratulations on a 96u profit.

A.

[vundarosa]

i am playing diagonal only right to left and left to right (slides)

                   right                left             
3 A 2 C
1 0 1 B   
3 C 2 A   
1 B 2 B                first 12 spins
2 C 3 A          l1 col2             w col3 
3 B 3 C          w col3 
3 C 2 B   
1 C 3 A          w col2              l1 col3 
3 A 2 B                                w col2 
1 C 1 B   
3 B 1 C              w                    w 
3 A 1 C   
2 A 2 B   
3 C 1 A              w                     l1 
0 A 3 A                                      w 
2 C 1 C   
1 B 3 A              w                    l1 
1 B 2 C                                    w 
3 C 1 C

[atlantis]

Thanks Vunderosa.
I understand it now... So you play the 2 diagonals and stop at a winner. Then you begin again in the next set of 12 numbers.
A.

[atlantis]

Hi vunderosa,

Below I have listed some code 4 results (notice I like to play with reverse results each alternate line)
However, I don't think I played it exactly as you would have played in your above example... Guess I haven't yet grasped it completely yet..

Can you show me using the exact same results how YOU would have played it. Thanks.
In any case it will be interesting to see how your idea fares in this "alternate code 4 notation" as well as the standard code 4 recording.

[reveal]
2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 
b 2 a 2 - first 16 results
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3
a 1 b 2
1 b 1 a 
b 1 a 3 
3 b 3 c - lost col2 ; won col3 
c 2 a 2
1 c 3 a
c 3 a 3
1 b 3 b - won col2; lost col3
c 3 b 2
2 b 1 b
c 2 a 1
2 b 3 a - lost col2; won col3
b 1 b 3 
3 a 2 c
c 1 a 3
2 b 1 a - won col2; won col3
a 1 b 3 
2 a 2 a 
b 1 c 2 
2 c 3 b - won col2; won col3
a 1 b 3 
3 b 1 a
b 1 c 2
2 a 2 a  - won col2; won col3
b 3 c 3
3 a 3 a
b 1 a 2
1 c 2 c - won col2; won col3
a 3 b 3
3 c 2 b 
a 3 b 2
3 b 2 a - won col3; lost col3
c 2 c 1 
3 a 3 c 
a 2 b 2
2 a 1 b  - lost col3; won col4
b 2 a 3
2 b 3 c
a 2 b 1
3 c 3 c - won col2; lost col3
b 1 c 3
2 c 3 c
b 2 c 3
3 b 3 c - won col2; lost col3
c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c - won col2; won col3
[/reveal]

Regards,
A.

[Johnlegend]

i am playing diagonal only right to left and left to right (slides)

                   right                left             
3 A 2 C
1 0 1 B   
3 C 2 A   
1 B 2 B                first 12 spins
2 C 3 A          l1 col2             w col3 
3 B 3 C          w col3 
3 C 2 B   
1 C 3 A          w col2              l1 col3 
3 A 2 B                                w col2 
1 C 1 B   
3 B 1 C              w                    w 
3 A 1 C   
2 A 2 B   
3 C 1 A              w                     l1 
0 A 3 A                                      w 
2 C 1 C   
1 B 3 A              w                    l1 
1 B 2 C                                    w 
3 C 1 C

vundarosa what are you opposing?

[atlantis]

Hi John,

He's playing it a totally different way. After the first 16 results have occurred he  bets that column 2 will be different result from the previous column 2 result of the same type (doz or col) The last previous result in col2 was "c" so he bets AGAINST that - and it won...
Now he bets that col3 will be different result from previous col3 result of same type (doz or col) The last previous result in col3 was "1" so he bets against that - and it won...

2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 
b 2 a 2 - first 16 results
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3

At least I think that's what he's doing !?   

A.

[amk]

At the moment there are so many great posts/tweaks in the game of roulette that it is difficult to keep up........

I think a new level has been reached........

[Johnlegend]

At the moment there are so many great posts/tweaks in the game of roulette that it is a difficult to keep up........

I think a new level has been reached........

So do I Amk, especially Atlantis's new idea to bet against A reverse slide. Played hit and run a 26 unit risk could rival CODE 4s 80 unit progression. Ive already counted 213 no loss.

And played and won four games this evening. All on the first step. I really like his idea...

[Johnlegend]

Hi John,

He's playing it a totally different way. After the first 16 results have occurred he  bets that column 2 will be different result from the previous column 2 result of the same type (doz or col) The last previous result in col2 was "c" so he bets AGAINST that - and it won...
Now he bets that col3 will be different result from previous col3 result of same type (doz or col) The last previous result in col3 was "1" so he bets against that - and it won...

2 a 3 a
a 2 a 2
2 c 1 c 
b 2 a 2 - first 16 results
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3
a 2 c 3
3 c 2 b
c 1 c 2
3 b 3 a - won col2 ; won col3

At least I think that's what he's doing !?   :)e

A.

Are you sure Atlantis? Only in another post he says he is only playing DIAGONALY. I want to get this right so I can test it alongside your brilliant idea.

[amk]

I still have to catch up completely....

However, from what I see at the moment wait until a diagonal TRIPAL has been formed.......

c
  c
    c

Then bet against a right to left QUAD forming?............

atlantis's example:

c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c
a 3 a 1   
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

tweak?:

c = bets

c
  c
     c
       c
     c
   c
c

[amk]

JohnLegend:

"I am still fascinated by Katillas Pyramid idea."

             2    ....doz
           2A3  .....doz/col/doz
          2B2C ..... doz/col/doz/col

etc.........

[Kattila]

Hi Guys  i wonder why don t you track at the same time
two matrix s  :

hit numbers

4   11  18  25
31  8   10   3
17  27  30   9
22  24  11  34

Now put this on original code 4 and the other one
so doz/col/doz/col  and also  col/doz/col/doz

from the above numbers we have two matrix s

Matrix 1   doz/col/doz/col 

1B2A
3B1C
2C3C
2C1A

Matrix 2  col/doz/col/doz   ( from same numbers)

A1C3
A1A1
B3C1
A2B3

This can be used for the pyramid  matrix  also.

cheers

[vundarosa]

Are you sure Atlantis? Only in another post he says he is only playing DIAGONALY. I want to get this right so I can test it alongside your brilliant idea.

---------------

hi guys, sorry i was locked out due to the forum migration...

yes i'm playing diagonaly...same as atlantis reverse slide idea...only thing is i was looking at not waiting till a loss ocurred (a foward slide formed) but just playing against the reverse formation, whatever it was.

i've virtually played another 200 lines for a total of 400 lines and saw 6 losses...not bad but to many for my liking.

one thing that stands out is the amount of first step wins...will see if playing only one bet per slide formation would yeld better results.


vundarosa

[Johnlegend]

I still have to catch up completely....

However, from what I see at the moment wait until a diagonal TRIPAL has been formed.......

c
  c
    c

Then bet against a right to left QUAD forming?............

atlantis's example:

c 2 a 2
2 c 1 c
a 3 c 2
3 b 2 c
a 3 a 1   
1 a 1 b     
b 3 a 2

tweak?:

c = bets

c
  c
     c
       c
     c
   c
c

Yes Amk its good isnt it. Alternatively you could begin after a full quad slide has formed for a 26 unit risk. But it might take some time. Getting a slide playing CODE SLIDER can take a while. Ive got 213 winning results. And have now played 12 real games. I need to talk to Atlantis about dedicating a thread to the reverse slide.

Its definately worthy of its own space. The potential of this gem is enormous...

[Johnlegend]

---------------

hi guys, sorry i was locked out due to the forum migration...

yes i'm playing diagonaly...same as atlantis reverse slide idea...only thing is i was looking at not waiting till a loss ocurred (a foward slide formed) but just playing against the reverse formation, whatever it was.

i've virtually played another 200 lines for a total of 400 lines and saw 6 losses...not bad but to many for my liking.

one thing that stands out is the amount of first step wins...will see if playing only one bet per slide formation would yeld better results.


vundarosa

Yes Vundarosa please do. As for six losses that's still a tidy profit. 400--156=244 plus. And I take it you werent playing HIT AND RUN? Also the important thing to work out. Is the wait between first step wins on average. Then you can bring the second tenet of success
into play. MONEY MANAGEMENT. And using a two or three tier staking system, capitalize on the high percentage of first step strikes.

I've played 15 real games against a column or dozen forming a reverse for CODE SLIDER. And I've won 12 on the first step, and 3 on the second. So if that kind of strikerate maintains. This is an absolute gem.