CODE 4

[vundarosa]

 
"Total profit for this one session of 4 games was 30 units"

-------

art,

i think your total profit was 6 units since your base unit was 5...not bad actually for such a short attack.


vundarosa

[artattack]

Hi Vundarosa.


Just to clear up.



1C3C
2A2A  won 5 units here    bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (won)
2B1A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won)
2B3A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won)
0B2C  won 5 units here   bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (lost)  then 2 x 30 units on 3rd step (won)Arthur.

[vundarosa]

Hi Vundarosa.


Just to clear up.



1C3C
2A2A  won 5 units here    bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (won)
2B1A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won)
2B3A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won)
0B2C  won 5 units here   bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (lost)  then 2 x 30 units on 3rd step (won)Arthur.

--------------
art what i was trying to say is your BR is $265, you won $30 but you played with a base unit value of $5.....so the profit is actually 6 units/coins/chips (not 30u) of $5 value each

vundarosa

[artattack]

I dont think you are quite understanding Vunderosa

1C3C
2A2A  won 5 units here    bet  was  5 units on 1st step (lost)  then  2 x 10 unts on 2nd step (won)

on this code my 1st bet was 5 units on the 1st dozen.

it lost because dozen 2 hit  so I am now down 5 units.

My next bet was  10 units on column A and 10 units on Column B  (betting against column C)

It won so that is 10 units to me, less 5  from the 1st lost so total 5 units.

end of that  game.


NEXT GAME

1C3C
2A2A 
2B1A  won 10 units here  bet  was  5 units on 1st step  (won) no need to play the rest of the code.

So I am now up 15 units,  5 from the 1st game and 10 from this one.

And so on.

Arthur.

[artattack]

Update of results.

Playing  "against" the the 1st step (bank 400).

156  Games + 375  (0.9 banks won)

1 loss

1st  step  wins  98
2nd step wins   36
3rd step wins    15
4th step  wins    6


Playing FOR  the 1st step to match  (bank 265)

152 Games  + 500  (1.8 banks won)

2 losses

1st  step  wins  56
2nd step wins   64
3rd step wins    26
4th step  wins    4

What has dramatically changed since I started playing FOR the 1st code is 2 dozens are now hitting more than expected, when I started they were only at 50% this made betting FOR the 1st step very profitable even flat betting.

A single dozen has hit 56 times and the 2 dozens 94 times, plus 2 losses.

This has changed, but as you can see it is still working quite well.

Arthur.

[Chrisbis]

These Real Money results Arthur, RX testing or Paper V Past Spins results?

Just wondered. 

[Johnlegend]

Guys out of respect for AMKs original CODE 4 method. I think we should start a fresh thread. Entitled CODE 4 REVERSE. As to not confuse newbies and observers. As to what this thread is about. I for one am still playing the ORIGINAL METHOD. And always will, its more than proven its value to me. I will start the thread title. Then we can post our results there, thankyou...

[Johnlegend]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 16/9/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1,121

TOTAL GAMES WON 1,120

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 1,120/1

BALANCE 2,080 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 578

STEP 2 WINS 332

STEP 3 WINS 184

STEP 4 WINS 26---LOSSES 1

The winning goes on with this marvel. As I continue to apply the 2 by 2 play. But record 5 games per session. Total losses within that 5 game record per session remain at 12. I will continue to update CODE 4, every 100--150 games played.

[artattack]

Hi Chris.

Real money this one.

I agree with the new thread CODE 4 REVERSE.

Arthur.

[Johnlegend]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 26/09/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 1,222

TOTAL GAMES WON 1,220

TOTAL GAMES LOST 2

STRIKERATE 610/1

BALANCE 2,120 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 632

STEP 2 WINS 358

STEP 3 WINS 202

STEP 4 WINS 28---LOSSES 2

I have caught my second loss with this great method. That brings my total to 13 recorded losses, and 2 losses suffered in live play over the 1,222 games played. I am still very satisfied with the performance of CODE 4. And it remains the most successful method ive played to date. Next update after 1,322 played games.

[ZigZag]

Thanks for the update John

Back on the wheel and been playing code 4 last few weeks

Your strike rate on the 1st 2nd and 3rd step gave me confidence to play code 4 just using a 3 step with a seperate 4 step in recovery mode....and having good sucess so far

I'm playing at Supercasino where i have 3 wheels to play on 

I'm using a 3 step with a 4 step in recovery mode

Supercasino allows me to play 50p on each dozen....So i use 2 seperate banks £13 for the 1/3 step and £40 for the 1/4 step (recovery) plus a little extra to cover zeros on last steps 

I play all 3 wheels, one after another.....Doing about 6 full sessions on all 3 wheels (3 wheels...2 hits per wheel = 1 full session...making me £3 per session) £18 per day...I have lost a 3rd step once where i had to go into recovery mode 1/4 steps but recoverd quick in 4.5 sessions..

Already withdrawn £50 

[Turner]

Hello,

Read as much of this as I can squeeze in, but I am confused about zero. Sorry if this has been addressed but its a lot of threads to digest.
In a few threads people have said" Zero, so that's a loss, so we bet the next one won't happen"
Technically zero is a win because 1,2,3,A,B,C didn't happen. that's the point. The sequence won't repeat. It didn't!

If my 3 sequence back is 13AB then I am looking for this not to happen.

Nex out are 0,3,A,B. I lose a lot of money, but technically its predicting correct. 13AB wasn't repeated. To bet against 3,A,B after 0 doesn't fit with the profile of the system.

You are betting that a 3 sequence won't happen after the first in the sequence went according to plan i.e. didn't repeat.

I don't know what the answer is, but this assumption that 0 is a loss is totally wrong. It was a win.

[woods101]

Hi Zig,

What's your recovery prog man?

[amk]

Amazing approach ZigZag............

Glad that you are back........

Will research it further.........

Ironic that that post was your 333rd...........

[ZigZag]

Cheers Amk its going ok on my first test but it wouldnt suit everyone as you may get spells where the 3 step loses come in bunches and find yourself forever in recovery mode not getting very far..Not happend to me yet..only the one 3 step loss to report so far but early days  :LoL:

Hi Zig,

What's your recovery prog man?

I'm covering zero on last step now...recovery is 1-1 3-3 9-9 29-29 + 3 chips on zero