The Re: AAIC betting system

[LuckyLucy]

Hey!

I know there is a thread about this allready and I have put it under general discussion for a reason, ie it's about betting using the above system, but not for roulette.

WHAT!! You say, then why are you posting it here?

Well my thoughts are that I think this is an excellent betting strategy, that hopefully we can apply to some of the fabulous systems already on here, but I was thinking can any of you bright sparks, think of any other betting scenario where we could use this stratergy?

As it only needs to tip slightly in favour of wins to losses, I was hoping to throw this out there and see  if it might be of some use to anyone? Or if it could be used on any other casino games for instance?

Anyway just a thought!

Lucy x

[Halba1]

hi lucy. i wouldn't use it personally. reason is - impossible to have wins > losses. don't worry about it.

over time, the house edge/random will drag you back into loss territory. its another stupid system on letstalkwinning.com

[LuckyLucy]

 

I was really wondering if it was feasible for using on some other form of betting..

Example:

Tennis @Wimbledon

Betting on the favourites in the early rounds as they, the ratio of wins to losses would surely tip towards wins?  Might make this effective?

Just an idea!

Lucy

[Halba1]

not a good idea lucy. how much return can one make from betting on favs? 2%?

[LuckyLucy]

Not a good idea lucy. how much return can one make from betting on favs? 2%?

Fair point

TBH it was only an example, just trying to get your creative juices flowing!

[esoito]

Not a good idea lucy. how much return can one make from betting on favs? 2%?

More if you can weed out the 'false favourites'. Plenty of those around if you know what to look for!

[Halba1]

betting doesn't work. bookmakers hold all the advantages. you will only lose.

[LuckyLucy]

Betfair?

[superman]

Betfair?

If you get early odds maybe, but as you know with betfair the closer to the off/start the lower the odds become

[Red Nickels]

Play baccarat (mini-baccarat.)  you should always play bac instead of roulette if you are just betting even chances-- mini-bac is faster and more fun and much better odds for the player than roulette.  I did not study the system you are discussing because it seemed to need for there to be more wins than losses, which did not make sense to me, because if you have a way to win more bets than you lose than you should not be progressing your bets in any way-- positive progression or negative progression-- you should just flat bet one unit at a time and not get involved with a system.  if you are looking for an even chance bet that wins a little more one side than the other then just bet banker against player every hand as banker has a slight edge over player, however you must pay a 5% commission on all winning banker bets.  will the system you are discussing do well if we always bet banker against player, usually win more bets than we lose, pay a 5% commission (only 5 cents on the dollar) on the bets that we win, and lose the other half of our bets placed?  (if so I'm game and will study and test the system.)

[warrior]

Play baccarat (mini-baccarat.)  you should always play bac instead of roulette if you are just betting even chances-- mini-bac is faster and more fun and much better odds for the player than roulette.  I did not study the system you are discussing because it seemed to need for there to be more wins than losses, which did not make sense to me, because if you have a way to win more bets than you lose than you should not be progressing your bets in any way-- positive progression or negative progression-- you should just flat bet one unit at a time and not get involved with a system.  if you are looking for an even chance bet that wins a little more one side than the other then just bet banker against player every hand as banker has a slight edge over player, however you must pay a 5% commission on all winning banker bets.  will the system you are discussing do well if we always bet banker against player, usually win more bets than we lose, pay a 5% commission (only 5 cents on the dollar) on the bets that we win, and lose the other half of our bets placed?  (if so I'm game and will study and test the system.)

HOW DOES BANKER HAVE MORE OF AN EDGE THEN PLAYER?

[Red Nickels]

HOW DOES BANKER HAVE MORE OF AN EDGE THEN PLAYER?

.......... you need to learn about baccarat.  anyone who is familiar with baccarat knows that banker wins slightly more than player, and how that is dealt with by the casino is explained in my post above.  the reason the casino charges a commission on winning banker bets, and not on winning player bets, is because banker wins more than player.  if they did not charge a commission on winning banker bets, everyone would bet banker all the time and win.  if you do a little research you will quickly find detailed stats as concerns the banker edge over player, and the casino edge in this game which is one of the lowest in the house and why this is one of the best (and easiest) games to play, if you're going to gamble.  the reason banker wins more than player has to do with the rules when the cards are dealt and when banker and player have to stand or draw.  but you don't even need to understand the rules to play mini-bac-- the dealer will handle all the cards, all you have to do is place your chips to bet banker, player or tie (and you will not lose on a tie if you didn't bet for a tie) and the dealer will do the rest.