Code 4 flat bet or progression

[monaco]

i thought it might be worthwhile just checking if betting for the pattern did make any discernable difference to the original set-up, ie. r/b, h/l, o/e, r/b, h/l, o/e.
im paper-testing, going back through the screen shots of the smartlive casino live wheels.

Results from last screen shot-
+14 units, biggest bet 5u, biggest drawdown -33units. 71 wins out of 132 spins.
i wouldn't expect that strike rate to be maintained, but if it can keep the wins & losses close enough, it could be alright.

this was the worst game:
R-L-E-R-H-E
bet 1u
B-H-O-R-L-E -2 (total drawdown -2)
R-L-O-R-H-E 0 (-2)
R-H-E-R-L-E -2 (-4)
B-L-O-B-H-Z -6 (-8)
bet 2u
R-H-E-B-L-O -8 (-16)
bet 3u
R-L-O-Z-L-O 0 (-16)
B-H-E-R-H-O -12 (-28)
bet 5u
R-H-E-B-H-O +10 (-18)
B-H-O-B-H-E 0 (-18)
B-L-O-B-H-E +20 (+2)
End. 25 wins, 60 spins (actually just seen i made a mistake on the 4th line - was 1 win better off than noted down)

tried a small real sample as well:
+6 units, biggest bet 1u, biggest drawdown -3units, 15 wins out of 24 spins - again, an unrealistic strike rate to maintain, but nice to win some easy units.

could it just be that betting for the pattern means we've got more chance of being on whichever ec is more prevalent at any given set of spins? hardly a decent size sample i suppose, will carry on testing..

[monaco]

Results from 2nd to last screenshot (had to continue to another screenshot to finish game):

+10 units, biggest bet 4u, biggest drawdown -26u, 98 wins from 197 spins (49.7%)

worst game (betting for pattern again):

R-H-E-R-H-O
bet 1u
B-L-O-R-L-E -4 (-4 total drawdown)
B-H-E-B-L-Z -2 (-6)
R-L-O-R-H-O -6 (-12)
bet 2u
R-L-E-B-H-O +4 (-8)
B-L-O-B-L-E -4 (-12)
R-H-O-R-H-E -4 (-16)
bet 3u
R-L-E-R-H-O 0 (-16)
R-L-O-R-L-E 0 (-16)
R-H-O-B-H-O -6 (-22)
bet 4u
B-H-O-R-H-O +8 (-14)
R-H-E-B-H-E -8 (-22)
R-H-O-B-H-E +16 (-6)
B-H-O-R-L-E 0 (-6)
R-Z-O-R-H-E 0 (-6)
B-H-E-R-H-O 0 (-6)
B-H +8 (+2)
End. +2units, 41 wins out of 92 spins

decent results again. I won't show results from all screenshots as could be a bit monotonous to look at! but will show any marked deviation..

[Halba1]

not too much difference, for or against in my opinion. it looks a bit better than guessing straight R/B though.


nearly 50% hit on times, not too bad

[monaco]

The method of play itself is still holding up â€" about 50 units up in total, but the different bet selections I have tried don’t seem to have any discernable impact â€" all come along at some point with a grind you just have to sit & bear.
Yesterday, 152 spins in about 2 and a half hours & finished 2 units up. The biggest drawdown in that period was -38 units, biggest bet 5u, but you really need a comfy chair for that kind of thing.

It seems to be basically a very slow, but I would say generally safe & consistent, method. I’ve still not had a drawdown where a 200u br would feel in danger, so anything like a 1000u br & i think you could merrily spin away..


In trying to maximise potential profits though, I’m going to experiment with beginning with a mini-martingale, 1-2-4. If this loses, we would then be 7 units down, so go to a flat bet of 2 across 6 spins.
Bet selection really is an open book at this point for me â€" for this period, I’m trying Follow The Last until a double loss then switch, hoping to win off streaks & tread water in chops.

So a small basic martingale to begin with to win some easy units, then flat betting combined with a divisor to keep bets in check & keep us in the game long enough to get through downturns..