Are weisbaden results correct...?

[woods101]

Hi guys,

I'm sure I saw a post somewhere a few months ago about how the above casinos online published results were possibly wrong/invalid/impossible based on some sort of mathematical probability. I think a couple of forum members had done some deep investigation into this. I can't seem to find this topic anywhere. Was this something that was resolved or is it still the case?

Thanks
woods

[iggiv]

someone got very biased spins from somewhere and someone analyzed them and found this strong bias and did not recommend using those spins as example. there are lots of other spins available in the  respective section.

[chrisbis]

Hi guys,

I'm sure I saw a post somewhere a few months ago about how the above casinos online published results were possibly wrong/invalid/impossible based on some sort of mathematical probability. I think a couple of forum members had done some deep investigation into this. I can't seem to find this topic anywhere. Was this something that was resolved or is it still the case?

Thanks
woods

I found It for U here

It was found out by Ophis. credit where credit due I think........ 


(hope that's of help to U Woods, and anyone else studying).

[Drazen]

I dont understand. It is not in casinos interest to have biased wheels. That could destroy them for short time realy.
Regards
              Drazen

[Bayes]

I don't think it was a biased wheel, maybe just a case of mistakes being made when the separate files were compiled into one large file; maybe some repeats of files or something like that.

[winkel]

wiesbaden spins are reliable.

There is only one thing to note: when the day starts testspins of the airball-machines show up. they are deleted when the day goes to archiv next day.

so the difference is about 2 or thre spins at the start.

for testing it has no effect because they are random spins like all others.

br
winkel

[woods101]

Thanks to Chris for the link and everyone else as well. Were the results in the original post found to be invalid then...?

thx
woods