***PHASE 3***

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Glad you like it Robeenhuut its a solid method. That's a very good point. Give me a day or two to check my records. And I will come back with the stats. I always record a game to conclusion. To my immediate memory few losing games go beyond the fourth step of the progression.

I'm not sure of the number, but its less than 12 I do know that. I'm currently on a winning streak of 48 games myself....

JL,

What happend to the Holy Grail method you were talking about posting on Sunday?  Did you decide you are not posting it?  I was looking forward to testing it to exhaustion...

[Johnlegend]

JL,

What happend to the Holy Grail method you were talking about posting on Sunday?  Did you decide you are not posting it?  I was looking forward to testing it to exhaustion...

Yeah, thinking on the advice of Twister, I decided to hold it until this Sunday. Besides, HOLY GRAIL or not. I already know most of you won't have the patience to test/use it anyway. A HOLY GRAIL comes at a price. that's why no-one really believes it exists.

I can't honestly say it will never lose either. What I can say is 31 units wiill never work harder for you. If it loses it will be so rare, it will have very little impact on your BR. I have around 26,000 spins where the progression isnt even being challenged. that's where I draw this outrageous boast from.

To me that's  a HOLY GRAIL. Any method that wins 1000/1 or better is a grail plain and simple. It means basically you can never show negative figures. You own the game of roulette. The physics of the roulette wheel allow freak patterns to form once in a blue moon. But if its so rare it has no impact of any significance, then a functional method that is designed to exploit this is a grail as far as I'm concerned. And that's what I have here.

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Yeah, thinking on the advice of Twister, I decided to hold it until this Sunday. Besides, HOLY GRAIL or not. I already know most of you won't have the patience to test/use it anyway. A HOLY GRAIL comes at a price. that's why no-one really believes it exists.

I can't honestly say it will never lose either. What I can say is 31 units wiill never work harder for you. If it loses it will be so rare, it will have very little impact on your BR. I have around 26,000 spins where the progression isnt even being challenged. that's where I draw this outrageous boast from.

To me that's  a HOLY GRAIL. Any method that wins 1000/1 or better is a grail plain and simple. It means basically you can never show negative figures. You own the game of roulette. The physics of the roulette wheel allow freak patterns to form once in a blue moon. But if its so rare it has no impact of any significance, then a functional method that is designed to exploit this is a grail as far as I'm concerned. And that's what I have here.

Sounds good.  Looking forward to it.  I'll test it.

[D1]

Hi JL

Played 200 live spins

9 bets

won 9 out of 9

one bet won at step 4

the other 8 all won in the first 2 steps

will continue testing

D1.

[Johnlegend]

Hi JL

Played 200 live spins

9 bets

won 9 out of 9

one bet won at step 4

the other 8 all won in the first 2 steps

will continue testing

D1.

Hi D1, yes you can win 20 in the first two steps then 4 in 4 steps. Out of interest the game that went to STEP 4. Were you betting FOR OR AGAINST PHASE 1? The reason I ask is of the 49 losses I have had. 34 of them came when betting against PHASE 1.

[D1]

Hi JL

yes It went to the fourth step while betting against phase 1

D1.

[Johnlegend]

Hi JL

yes It went to the fourth step while betting against phase 1

D1.

Yes D1 it is the weaker of the two selections. And I have considered waiting an extra spin when that one qualifies. If I had done my losses would be less.

For ROBEENHUUT, here is the breakdown of my 49 losing games

LOSSES FOR PHASE 1 (15)

LOSSES AGAINST PHASE 1 (34)

LOSSES STEP 4 of the progression 41

LOSSES STEP 5 of a virtual progression 6

LOSSES STEP 6 of a virtual progression 2

There you go Robeenhuut. If the PROGRESSION was 5 steps. I would only have lost 93 units 8 times in two years and over 2,000 games. Pretty good I think.

[Robeenhuut]

Yes D1 it is the weaker of the two selections. And I have considered waiting an extra spin when that one qualifies. If I had done my losses would be less.

For ROBEENHUUT, here is the breakdown of my 49 losing games

LOSSES FOR PHASE 1 (15)

LOSSES AGAINST PHASE 1 (34)

LOSSES STEP 4 of the progression 41

LOSSES STEP 5 of a virtual progression 6

LOSSES STEP 6 of a virtual progression 2

There you go Robeenhuut. If the PROGRESSION was 5 steps. I would only have lost 93 units 8 times in two years and over 2,000 games. Pretty good I think.

Hi JL

Thx 4 stats.  So u would be appr. 1200 units more ahead. In the long run it makes sense f u r willing 2 risk extra 48 units 

4 me looking at these numbers its no brainer 

[LuckyLucy]

Hi JL,

Thank u for sharing, going to have a Ho on this later today. It looks a very interesting and clever system!  Hope everyone is having success with it so far.
Lucy

[Johnlegend]

Hi JL,

Thank you for sharing, going to have a Ho on this later today. It looks a very interesting and clever system!  Hope everyone is having success with it so far.
Lucy

You are welcome Lucy, the main thing is to stay with a method long enough to learn its strengths and common behaviour. Paper test it until you are confident. And over time you know it so well your reactions to a loss or extraordinary winning streak are instinctive.

PHASE 3 is capable of impressive results. Anyone who thinks 45 units is too much to risk on a game. Has to keep in mind you win 3 units per game. And at anytime you can be locked into a 50 plus winning streak. I'm currently 51/0 . And with this method and the way I play it that's no special event. Over the last two years I've broken the 100 barrier 7 times.

And when you consider it takes 15 wins to match a loss, you start to see the potential.

[ZeroBlue]

Line


1
5
2
1---->trigger1
6---->trigger2
4
3
3---->1st level bet trigger1 5-2-1 lines Lost
1---->1st level bet trigger2 2-1-6 and 2nd level bet trigger1 5-2-1
4 ----> won for both triggers






I love when this happens.


I triple my bet in this case.    

John, nice method.

Zer0Blue

[warrior]

GREAT METHOD ! looking forward to sundays
gift thanks John .

[Johnlegend]

GREAT METHOD ! looking forward to sundays
gift thanks John .

Thanks Warrior,
Sundays method is the finale for me, and to use a quote from master Bruce. "It is like a finger pointing to the moon, CONCENTRATE ON THE FINGER, and you will miss ALL THAT HEAVENLY GLORY". The finger in this case is time. The heavenly glory is the unrealized potential by those who are too hung up on time...

[warrior]

Thanks Warrior,
Sundays method is the finale for me, and to use a quote from master Bruce. "It is like a finger pointing to the moon, CONCENTRATE ON THE FINGER, and you will miss ALL THAT HEAVENLY GLORY". The finger in this case is time. The heavenly glory is the unrealized potential by those who are too hung up on time...

yes my friend 

[Hermes]

And I will tweak the Holy Schmoly as usual. Holy Schmoly is each system or strategy which makes more than lose in long run. Advice to perfectionists: don't look the whole life for never losing system! Life is too precious.
Hermes