I have decided to make public the mathematically infallible roulette system

[Drazen]

One day i will share my Power 6 system its on lines ,i have won with this for the last 3 years,I'm not rich but ,no losses and no disaters,mr barretta.

Warrior i just wonder, is that maybe the one that wins xxx chips on every spin?

Cheers

[TwoCatSam]

I feel another challenge coming on!!

Bayes

Better complete that software!!

Maybe we should all buy Bayes a beer!

Sam

[amk]

I thought it was an EC method warrior, or do you have perhaps two methods to hopefully share one day I believe you!


TwoCat, would be great if we could buy Bayes a beer as well as a lot of players on this forum.

I have infact never meet a fellow roulette player or nobody mentions it at least and yes I have not been to a live casino to play roulette yet, only online. I think I should but its a good commute, 1 hour with the bus. It would be interesting to speak with players though and see which methods they use.

Would be a good conversation.

[Robeenhuut]

TwoCatSam
I'm afraid you have not understood.
In the book you will see the demonstration that the straight number is the best possible bet(or the less worse!)
I hope you understand it,otherwise read only the conclusions.


-2,7% of all money put on a roulette table is the average loss of a given player.
But on inside bets,because there is a big variance/unbalance, the player will be sooner or later out of money in a negative session, and the the loss is much bigger.
For that the book has nothing to do.
Ask the waiter of a  Casino and he knows that too

Hola Beretta

At least we agree about straight numbers. By inside bets i meant only straight numbers bets flat or with short and mild progression. And what exactly do u mean by bigger variance on inside bets? I guess in plain english it means that 1 street sleeping 4 more than 100 spins will hurt u more than 1 EC sleeping 4 20+ spins?  So  betting with progression u would lose more money betting on streets than EC's f these 2 extremely rare events occurred.

[beretta28]

On straight numbers OK.
As I said in another thread,the most satisfactory system I ever used was on straight numbers,as you say too,with a mild progression,but not so short.
But,as you know for sure,big bkr needed


By bigger variance I mean exactly what you wrote.
The proof is:
- at a roulette table you have sure noticed that,in a negative session, an inside players is out of money earlier than an ECs player,even if this one has no possibility to win in the long term(possibility that the inside players have,if they play straight numbers!)
Read the nice post of Bayes  sent a few days ago about that,that confirms my position!
By the way,why,in your opinion,in European roulette on ECs there is "en prison rule",that means to lose only 50 % of your bet?Because Casinos are generous and they want to be fair with ECs players?.....


-if you look the  yearly balance sheet of all Casinos,you will see that their profit is much more than 2,70% of all the bets that the players have put on the table during the year.Just for the raison above!
The solution(forbidden)would be the association among players.In this case the Casino profits would decrease at roughly 2,70% and they wouldn't be happy!

[jarabo002]

Interesting progression.

The formula calculates the next bet about all winnings and losses in all the session.

Maybe it is needed to study this formula again for a No Zero table. The zero always kills the bankroll!!!

[RouletteGhost]

i still like the gr8 progression for double dozens

[jarabo002]

i still like the gr8 progression for double dozens

I cannot remember where I have found gr8 progression long time ago.

[RouletteGhost]

the gr8 progression is this:

1111111
2222222
3333333
4444444
5555555

you bet one unit 7 times, if you are up do another series of one unit
if you are down go up to 2 units for 7 spins, if you reach a high drop down to one unit

however i am really interested in this system in this thread because the OP says it would shut down roulette

as an american listening to you europeans talk sometimes i dont quiote understand, LOL 

[jarabo002]

the gr8 progression is this:

1111111
2222222
3333333
4444444
5555555

you bet one unit 7 times, if you are up do another series of one unit
if you are down go up to 2 units for 7 spins, if you reach a high drop down to one unit

however i am really interested in this system in this thread because the OP says it would shut down roulette

as an american listening to you europeans talk sometimes i dont quiote understand, LOL 

Thanks! i supouse everytime we are in profit reset to 1 unit bet without wait to complete the bet line, it doesnt?

[RouletteGhost]

Thanks! i supouse everytime we are in profit reset to 1 unit bet without wait to complete the bet line, it doesnt?

correct. according to the member gr8player once you are in profit reset to 1 unit without having to finish the current string

[RouletteGhost]

can someone better explain this system to me?

the math is hard for me to understand....any americans here?

[RouletteGhost]

how is this mathematically perfect system working for everyone?

still trying to figure this out myself, still confused

[RouletteGhost]

OP said its infalliable

Anyone ?

I responded a few times but no answer

Anyoneeeee?

[Turner]

can someone better explain this system to me?

the math is hard for me to understand....any americans here?

lol...us british arnt too bad at maths..

you know....

Charles Babbage
Alan Turin
Isaac Newton
Paul Dirac
......