***THE REVERSE SLIDE***

[Johnlegend]

--------(((METHOD THE REVERSE SLIDE)))--------

Firstly I must give thanks and credit to Atlantis for his sharp observations in coming up with this idea. I have been thoroughly testing this gem over the last two weeks. And I have had remarkable results. As I expected. Playing 20 games a day for both Dozens and columns. I have yet to lose. In fact I haven't even been taken to the fourth step of the progression in now 300 games played. The RULES

1, We record spins for the columns and Dozens in two separate four wide Matrixes until we have a diagonal run of three of the same column or dozen. Example

1232
2133
1312--Trigger Dozen 1

CCBA
BBAC
CABB--Trigger Column A

2, We now bet using a 4 step progression (80 units risk) that we won't get the following

1232
2133
1312
2221
1312
2121
1313--As you can see Dozen 1 has formed a slide from left to right then a reverse slide from right to left. This is what we don't want to see. And in 300 games I haven't seen 1.

3, My successful results have been drawn from playing a maximum of 4 consecutive games a session. So I recommend you play no more than 4 games consecutively.

4, For those who don't want to risk 80 units. I suggest you wait until a complete slide has formed. Then bet against a reverse forming covering the remaining three steps. Most wins come in the first two steps of the progression as expected. And I have yet to use step 4, even when a zero has hit previously.

Results after 300 games played.


TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 300

TOTAL GAMES WON 300

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 100%

BALANCE 600 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 144
STEP 2 WINS 126
STEP 3 WINS 30
STEP 4 CURRENTLY UNCHALLENGED.

This method feels even stronger than CODE 4 to me. Its very difficult for random to form such a precise pattern especially when playing short sessions. It is firmly in my arsenal of methods from now on. And again full kudos to Atlantis for his sharp observations. Lets see what kind of strikerate this gem can deliver over the longterm.

[atlantis]

Well.. well. Who would have thought it? 
AMAZING RESULTS JL!
A.

[Johnlegend]

Well.. well. Who would have thought it? 
AMAZING RESULTS JL!
A.

Hi Atlantis yes its a great one. I really think this could be the best of the lot...

[atlantis]

Hi Pratikpop,

He is betting against the following happening:

1232
2133
1312
2221 - bet here against diagonal slide 1-1-1-1. If lose against doz 1 on reverse diagonal slide
1312
2121
1313

Same thing for columns.

A.

[atlantis]

Hi Pratikpop,

Or you can start betting AFTER the diagonal slide has formed e.g: 1-1-1-1 and now bet 3 times against a REVERSE slide occurring for dozen 1:

1232
2133
1312
2221
1312 - start bet here against doz 1 on reverse slide (3 bets only)
2121
1313

2 doz bet: 1-1, 3-3, 9-9 =26 units. 3 steps.

Bet at the points indicated in red on the reverse right to left diagonal slide. Stop at win.

Cheers,
A

[Chrisbis]

Are there other "Patterns", U could be against forming somewhere in there?

[Proofreaders2000]

Congratulations Atlantis, JohnLegend.  This looks good   

*I sure miss Ophis and the MST--it could be useful here

[atlantis]

Are there other "Patterns", You could be against forming somewhere in there?

Hi ChrisBis,

Well I do not wish to dilute JL's original instructions nor to confuse anyone unduly; so apologies for that - - - but one thing you *could* do to gain more bet opportunities is to bet against a symmetrically balanced PATTERN of SEVEN occurring on the slide AND the reverse slide.


You need a diagonal line formed consisting of 2 dozens only eg: 2-3-3-2


For this to become a perfectly symmetrical pattern on a diagonal reverse slide it would have to form a balanced pattern of:

2-3-3*2*3-3-2

So, knowing that, you would now bet against the reverse diagonal of 3-3-2 happening.

1232
2133
1312
2223
1312 - bet against doz3 LOST
2121 - bet against doz3 WON
2313


Examples:
For 1-1-1-2 you'd bet against dozens 1-1-1 (that it didn't form the sym. pattern 1-1-1*2*1-1-1)
For 2-3-2-3 you'd bet against dozens 2-3-2 (that it didn't form the sym. pattern  2-3-2*3*2-3-2)
For 2-2-3-3 you'd bet against dozens 3-2-2 (that it didn't form the sym. pattern  2-2-3*3*3-2-2)

A.

[GLC]

Hi Pratikpop,

Or you can start betting AFTER the diagonal slide has formed e.g: 1-1-1-1 and now bet 3 times against a REVERSE slide occurring for dozen 1:

1232
2133
1312
2221
1312 - start bet here against doz 1 on reverse slide (3 bets only)
2121
1313

2 doz bet: 1-1, 3-3, 9-9 =26 units. 3 steps.

Bet at the points indicated in red on the reverse right to left diagonal slide. Stop at win.

Cheers,
A

A,
1232
2133
1312
2221
1312
2121
1313
      x  Do we start betting here also or wait until the previous pattern has won or lost before starting to retrack?

[atlantis]

A,
1232
2133
1312
2221
1312
2121
1313
      x  Do we start betting here also or wait until the previous pattern has won or lost before starting to retrack?

Play only one attack at a time.
In your example the coup (in red) would have already been won (or lost) so yes you would carry on
after the first 3 results on the next following line and bet the first step against dozen 1 in the 4th column if doing it the original way.
Remember JL says to quit after 3 or 4 consecutive victories (hit 'n' run)
A.

[GLC]

I have no doubt that a hit n run strategy will work well on this method.


I have 3500 spins arranged in a 4 wide matrix and I just did a quick perusal using the following method:


Bet progression: 1-1, 3-3, 9-9, 27-27, 81-81, 243-243  for a total of 844 units invested.
Even though we have to risk 844 units, I don't really think we'll ever need all of it.


I started betting against the slide/reverse slide forming starting on the second line of each row.


1 2 2 3
2 3         Right here I win because I bet against a 1 spinning


1 2 2 3
2 3 3 1
1 2 2 2  Right here I lost 1-1 because I was betting against a 2 spinning
3 1 1 2  Right here I won in the 3rd line betting against a 2 and lost in 2nd line betting against 1.
2 1 3 2  Here I won in 3rd betting against a 1 and won in 2nd betting against a 3.
etc... forever


I examined 850+ games and they all won.
The highest bet I had to make was 27-27 which I had to make 5 times
I still had two more levels available if I had needed them.
At this point, even if I lose a complete progression, I'm still ahead.


I think with my Attention Deficit Disorder I can play this system without going crazy tracking.
I know that there's a loss in the mix somewhere, but if there wasn't, it would be unbelievable.  You would just sit down and start winning and when you had won all you needed for the day, pack up and leave.


As far as I can see, this is possibly what I've been looking for.  Fortunately, I'm in no hurry and I have a couple of years to find out for sure.  And you can rest assured that I won't risk a real bankroll until I'm 100% sure.


Thanks JL and A.


GLC

[GLC]

Here's an interesting observation.  I just checked those same spins against TurboGenius' system where he bets that the last for dozens won't spin in the same sequence again.  In other words if the last 4 spins were 1323 he bets against 1323 spinning in the next for spins.  I just expanded the idea to 6 instead of 4 to see how the results would stack up against the reverse slide idea and in my 3500 spins, I got very similar results but the slide edged out as a safer bet.  Granted 3500 spins is just a drop in the bucket for testing purposes, but it does show a tendency.


Betting that the last 6 don't repeat:


Over 850 wins.
Bet the 4th level 27-27 nine times.
Bet the 5th level  80-80 one time.
Never had to bet the 243-243 level.


Just for info.


Hey JL.  Why don't you erase my last few posts and I'll copy them to a new topic under Notepad so they don't create white noise on this topic.  That way everything on this topic will be about your original method.

GLC

[amk]

Thanks JohnLegend and atlantis for taking us to this level............

GLC:

"I examined 850+ games and they all won.
The highest bet I had to make was 27-27 which I had to make 5 times
I still had two more levels available if I had needed them.
At this point, even if I lose a complete progression, I'm still ahead."

Just the start of REVERSE SLIDE............................ 

[stormyace]

I have no doubt that a hit n run strategy will work well on this method.


I have 3500 spins arranged in a 4 wide matrix and I just did a quick perusal using the following method:


Bet progression: 1-1, 3-3, 9-9, 27-27, 81-81, 243-243  for a total of 844 units invested.
Even though we have to risk 844 units, I don't really think we'll ever need all of it.


I started betting against the slide/reverse slide forming starting on the second line of each row.


1 2 2 3
2 3         Right here I win because I bet against a 1 spinning


1 2 2 3
2 3 3 1
1 2 2 2  Right here I lost 1-1 because I was betting against a 2 spinning
3 1 1 2  Right here I won in the 3rd line betting against a 2 and lost in 2nd line betting against 1.
2 1 3 2  Here I won in 3rd betting against a 1 and won in 2nd betting against a 3.
etc... forever


I examined 850+ games and they all won.
The highest bet I had to make was 27-27 which I had to make 5 times
I still had two more levels available if I had needed them.
At this point, even if I lose a complete progression, I'm still ahead.


I think with my Attention Deficit Disorder I can play this system without going crazy tracking.
I know that there's a loss in the mix somewhere, but if there wasn't, it would be unbelievable.  You would just sit down and start winning and when you had won all you needed for the day, pack up and leave.


As far as I can see, this is possibly what I've been looking for.  Fortunately, I'm in no hurry and I have a couple of years to find out for sure.  And you can rest assured that I won't risk a real bankroll until I'm 100% sure.


Thanks JL and A.


GLC

What happens if you get like 9 dozens in a row

[stormyace]

what sort of betting opportunities do you get with this