The Missing Pattern EC System Put To Inside Music!

[Nickmsi]

I was up $1,172 after 50 sessions.

I played 9 more sessions and was up to $1,357. 

Then on last session, lost $204 dropping total to $1,153, hence the $19.

[Chrisbis]

My "Notes" on Results for latest session.  (Whistle along Now!)

6 Sessions played

Winning Sessions = 6     (If I had stuck to rigid rules, I too would have lost one!)
Losing Sessions   = 0      (so this would be now = 1)
Casino                 =  Bet Voyager No Zero
Highest Level of Progression = 21 (4 bet sequence)
Lowest Level of Progression  =   1 (5 bet sequence)
Highest Spins to Betting         =   19
Lowest Spins to Betting         =     8

[Chrisbis]

My "2ND Notes" on Results for latest session.  (Whistle, twice Now!)

5 Sessions played

Winning Sessions = 5
Losing Sessions   = 0
Casino                 =  Bet Voyager No Zero
Highest Level of Progression = 13 (4 bet sequence)
Lowest Level of Progression  =   1 (4 bet sequence)
Highest Spins to Betting         =   21
Lowest Spins to Betting         =     8

[Chrisbis]

My "3RD Notes" on Results for latest session.  (Whistle, as U work!!)

9 Sessions played

Winning Sessions = 9
Losing Sessions   = 0
Casino                 =  Bet Voyager No Zero
Highest Level of Progression = 15 (4 number/bet sequence)
Lowest Level of Progression  =   1 (4 number/bet sequence)
Highest Spins to Betting         =   29
Lowest Spins to Betting         =   13

Was doing well enough to make a 40 Euro withdrawal tonight!!
Nice to be winning again. 

[Nickmsi]

Nice going  . . . .

Johnny one note here . . . hit another speed bump but the bankroll is still growing and that's what important.

Sessions Played: 80
Sessions Won:    78
Sessions Lost:      2
Bankroll:         1,385

I stop at the 20 progression level and accept the 204 loss.
Both my losses were on 4 numbers.

[amk]

Looks very interesting ChrisBis...................

Miss TwisterUk to................

[Chrisbis]

Nice going  . . . .

Johnny.................
I stop at the 20 progression level and accept the 204 loss.
Both my losses were on 4 numbers.

I wouldn't!! lol

I design it to go just that little bit further.
U should now try with Real Money and see what happens!

I now have 22 levels for both sequences.... (4 number bet, and 5 number bet)

[Chrisbis]

My "4TH Notes" on Results for latest session- Friday.  (Weekend is here!!)

9 Sessions played

Winning Sessions                   = 9
Losing Sessions                     = 0
Casino                                    =  Bet Voyager No Zero
Highest Level of Progression  =  15 (4 number/bet sequence)
Lowest Level of Progression  =    1 (5 number/bet sequence)
Highest Spins to Betting        =   25
Lowest Spins to Betting         =  13

Sessions:-
[csv=,]
EC Group/Actual Bet,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on
-,BOL,REL,REL,BEH,BOL,BEH,BOH,ROL,ROH
ROL 1-3-5-7-9,X5,X1,X5,X9,X7,X1,X3,,X1
BEL 2-4-6-8-10,X10,X2,X8,X10,X8,X4,X6,X2,X10
BOL 11-13-15-17,,X11,X11,X17,,X11,X17,X15,X15
REL 12-14-16-18,X14,,,X14,X14,X14,X12,X14,X14
ROH 19-21-23-25-27,X19,X23,X19,X19,X19,X19,X21,,
BEH 20-22-24-26-28,X22,X22,X28,,X22,,X22,X22,X28
BOH 29-31-33-35,X33,X29,X31,X35,X35,X35,,X35,X35
REH 30-32-34-36,X32,X36,X36,X32,X34,X36,X36,X34,X34
[/csv]

[marivo]

If Results are choppy on the Marquee, and U feel early betting would be un-wise, I suggest U track TWO sets of Results/EC Groups, to even the play out a little, and prevent your Progression levels from racing off into the Deep Blue Yonder!

Can you explain what you meant by this? Choppy results, early betting, tracking two sets of results/ec groups...?
Thanks

[atlantis]

Hi Chrisbis,

Good results! Gonna try it soon...
A.

[Chrisbis]

@marivo

This is Two Sets.(See Below, table copied from my Last set of results)

So U would not bet on the first one, (which was BOL), and track for the Next series/set, before I started betting.
It will even out results for U.
Think of it, as someone else asked me, as Betting Virtual!
[csv=,]
EC Group/Actual Bet,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on,Bet on
-,BOL,REL
ROL 1-3-5-7-9,X5,X1
BEL 2-4-6-8-10,X10,X2
BOL 11-13-15-17,,X11
REL 12-14-16-18,X14,
ROH 19-21-23-25-27,X19,X23
BEH 20-22-24-26-28,X22,X22
BOH 29-31-33-35,X33,X29
REH 30-32-34-36,X32,X36
[/csv]

[Nickmsi]

 Hi Chris
Final Roulette Extreme results:


110 Sessions Played
106 Sessions Won
4 Sessions Lost (last progression was level 20 and then stopped, had one session that went 39 spins without hitting any of the 4 numbers played)
Ending Balance:  $1,568  (playing $1.00 units) Starting Balance=0


I'm sure we will hit losing streaks but I have been able to recover so far without increasing the progressions.  Only time will tell and maybe there is a better progression, GLC, any ideas?


What's to like:
The average amount won per session: $14.25
Usually get a bet within 30 spins
Progressions reasonable especially considering the return:  the 20^th level on a 4 string guitar (4 numbers bet) totals $204.  That's $204 bet for a return of $14.25 which is about 14 to 1.  This is way better than Martingale or other progressions where you would bet $256, $512 etc just to get a $1.00 win.


It's time to trade in the guitar pick for chips and play for real.


Cheers . . . Nick

[vladir]

I kind of like the idea...but.... Since you are betting individual numbers in the end, why not use 8 sectors, but based on the wheel layout instead of the R/B O/E H/L ? Something like this for example:
(5 sectos of 5, 3 sectors of 4, with the advantage of including 0)



0    32    15    19    4
21    2    25    17
34    6    27    13    36
11    30    8    23
10    5    24    16    33
1    20    14    31    9
22    18    29    7
28    12    35    3    26


I also think that, if there is an advantage to this, is only plaed in a real roulette, not rng...  Try to use this in the same set of spins, and compare the results to see what is better. And let us know the results please.

Cheers

[Nickmsi]

Good idea vlad . . .

Will give it a go and see if any difference.

Nick

[Chrisbis]

I'm all in for new ideas.
What does this actual mean?

I kind of like the idea...but.... Since you are betting individual numbers in the end, why not use 8 sectors, but based on the wheel layout instead of the R/B O/E H/L ? Something like this for example:
(5 sectos of 5, 3 sectors of 4, with the advantage of including 0)