• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Situational / Strategy play

Started by ego, Sep 14, 02:16 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

Kattila

#15
Sep 19, 05:51 PM 2011
Quote :

***
The Bet Selection & Triggers.
1). First you track the previous four outcomes (the bet selection) and play the future four outcomes - but there is only three bets made.
As the first outcome of the future four outcomes is a trigger - if that colour is the same as the first colour of your previous four (the bet selection) you will play opposite towards does outcomes of the previous four.
If the colour is the opposite towards the first outcome of your previous four you will play same.

2). Second you only play after one cycle fail and only attack after you have one fictive win.
Every sequence will end with three loses. ***



When you the time please give us some examples to all this from above.
1).  If the previous is xxxx and the trigger is x then bet xxx.
2).  one failed cycle is 3 Ls  ?  and give us example of fictive win

thanks

ego

#16
Sep 19, 05:58 PM 2011
 
I show you the files from the LW i post on this topic - hope it get a littel more clear.
Did find one loss of six in a row once and nothing is due to happen.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#17
Sep 20, 01:42 AM 2011
 
There is variation to this - one i like to have fun with is just play oppisite of previos three ...
Some one could attack once or let it ride using a fibo ...
One could chart the outcomes using lines with previos 3 or 4 ...   

LWLWLWLWWWW LLL WWWLWWLW

1 2 2
1 1 2 LW
1 2 2 LW
1 2 1 LLW
1 1 2 LLW
1 2 1 LW
1 2 1 LLL
2 2 1 W
2 1 2 LW
1 2 1 W
1 2 1 LLL
2 2 2 W
2 1 2 LW
1 1 2 W
1 2 1 LW
2 1 1 W
1 1 2 W
2 1 1 W
1 1 2 W
1 2 2 LW
1 2 2 LLL
1 2 1 LLW
1 1 2 LW
1 1 2 LLL
2 2 1 W
2 1 2 LW
2 1 1 LLW
1 2 1 W
2 2 1 W
1 2 1 W
2 1 1 W
1 1 2 W
2 1 2 W
1 1 2 W
2 2 1 W
2 2 2 LLW
2 1 1 LW
1 1 2 W
2 2 2 W
2 2 1 LLW
1 1 1 W
2 2 2 W
2 1 2 LW
2 1 1 LLW
1 1 2 W
1 2 2 LW
1 1 1 LW
1 1 1 LLL
2 1 2 W
1 1 2 W
1 1 1 LLW
1 2 1 LW
2 2 1 W
1 1 2 W
1 1 1 LLW
1 1 2 LLW
2 1 2 W
1 2 1 W
2 2 1 W
2 2 1 LLL
2 2 1 LLL
1 2 1 W
2 1 1 W
2 1 2 LLW
2 1 2 LLL
1 1 1 W
2 1 1 W
2 1 1 LLL
1 2 2 W
1 2 2 LLL
1 2 1 LLW
2 2 1 W
1 1 2 W
1 1 2 LLL
2 1 1 W
1 2 1 W
1 2 1 LLL
2 1 2 W
1 1 2 W
2 1 2 W
2 1 2 LLL
1 1 1 W
1 2 2 LW
2 2 2 W
2 2 2 LLL
2 2 2 LLL
1 1 1 W
2 2 1 W
1 1 1 W
1 2 1 LW
1 1 1 LW
1 2 1 LW
1 1 1 LW
1 1 1 LLL
1 2 2 LW
1 1 2 LW
2 1 2 W
1 1 2 W
2 2 2 W
1 2 2 W
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#18
Sep 20, 03:04 AM 2011
 
The file above is from today 2011-09-20 and this file below 2011-09-19 from random.org
Using the way of attacking once ...

W LLL WLWWLWLLWLLWW

2 1 1
2 2 2
1 1 2
2 1 1
1 2 2
1 2 2 LLL
1 1 1 LW
2 2 2 W
2 2 2 LLL
2 2 1 LLW
2 2 1 LLL
2 1 1 LW
1 1 1 W
1 1 1 LLL
2 2 1 W
2 1 2 LW
1 1 2
1 2 2
1 1 2
1 1 2 LLL
1 2 2 LW
2 1 2 W
1 2 2
2 1 1
1 2 2
2 2 1
1 2 1
2 2 2
2 1 1
1 1 1
1 2 1
1 1 2
2 1 2
2 2 2
1 1 1
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 2 LLL
1 2 1 LLW
1 1 2 LW
2 2 1
2 1 1
1 1 1
1 2 1
2 2 2
2 1 2
1 1 2
2 2 2
1 1 2
2 1 2
2 2 1
2 2 2
2 1 1
2 2 2
2 2 1
2 1 1
1 1 1
2 2 2
2 2 1
2 1 1
2 1 1 LLL
1 2 1 W
1 2 2 LLW
2 2 1
1 2 2
2 1 2
2 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
2 1 1
1 2 1
2 1 2
2 2 1
2 1 1
1 1 1
2 2 2
1 2 2
2 2 1
2 1 2
2 2 1
1 1 2
1 1 2 LLL
1 2 1 LW
1 2 2 LLW
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 1 2
2 1 1
1 1 2
2 1 2
2 2 2
2 2 2 LLL
2 1 2 LW
1 2 1 W
1 1 2
2 2 2
2 1 1
2 2 1
2 2 2
2 1 1


With fibo it would look like this ...

Stage 1. 111 or 112
Stage 2. 223 or 345
Stage 3. 358 or 8 13 21
Stage 4. 13.21.34 or 34 55 89
Stage 5. 55.89. and maximum
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#19
Sep 20, 03:11 AM 2011
 
Grind & Skip's

One that is not action player and just want to relax for hours and go home with 2 to 3 units in wallet could do the follwing.

LWLWLWLWWWW LLL WWWLWWLW

W LLL WLWWLWLLWLLWW

Play twice after one loss.

WWWWW LL WW

LL WLWLW
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Chrisbis

#20
Sep 20, 03:14 AM 2011
Hi.

Do u know the REVEAL feature is available for showing Long lists of numbers?

The Window Icon above the message box, or here's the PHP code:-
[reveal]  Ur content* [/reveal]

cheers.

Nice work BTW.  :thumbsup:
Roulette..........................
Physical in Nature, Random in Opportunity                                                    The Reveal Originator!

Kattila

#21
Sep 20, 06:36 PM 2011
Quote from: ego on Sep 19, 05:58 PM 2011

I show you the files from the LW i post on this topic - hope it get a littel more clear.
Did find one loss of six in a row once and nothing is due to happen.

Ok thanks.
Can you run a 1 000 000 spins test with that 4 even money bet selection and the 14 fibo steps ( 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89) ?

thanks

ego

#22
Sep 20, 11:38 PM 2011
 
Hello.

I don't play roulette systems - but i am a bonus hunter and play with free money with out deposit my own money - then i wagering them x amount and take the free money with winnings from the casino.

This is why i still enjoy to write about things like this topic.
It will fail or tank - so there is no need to code it or run simulation.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Kattila

#23
Sep 21, 05:06 AM 2011
Quote from: ego on Sep 20, 11:38 PM 2011

Hello.

I don't play roulette systems - but i am a bonus hunter and play with free money with out deposit my own money - then i wagering them x amount and take the free money with winnings from the casino.

This is why i still enjoy to write about things like this topic.
It will fail or tank - so there is no need to code it or run simulation.

Cheers

You right, finally will tank in the long run like any system, method etc...
I was just curious to see if hold up after 1 000 000 (or more ) spins.
I belive if one system it s still up after so many spins , we have more
chances to win with that system  than with other ordinary system .


thanks

ego

#24
Sep 21, 05:58 AM 2011
Quote from: Kattila on Sep 21, 05:06 AM 2011

You right, finally will tank in the long run like any system, method etc...
I was just curious to see if hold up after 1 000 000 (or more ) spins.
I belive if one system it s still up after so many spins , we have more
chances to win with that system  than with other ordinary system .


thanks

Sure maybe it end up with a positive gain after 1 000 000 even if the progression might fail once - i done that and it is possible ...
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.
-
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions