Streets At Bet Voyager.... anyone play them?

[Chrisbis]

Does any member here play the Streets at Bet Voyager?

Just wondered.

A nice simple Progression list for Streets. (0.10cents..... lot of Money eh!!)

[csv=,]
Level,Style of Bet, Bet, Loss, Win, Gain, Notes
1,0.10 on 1 Street,0.10,0.10,1.20,1.10,-
2,0.10 on 1 Street,0.10,0.20,1.20,1.00,-
3,0.10 on 1 Street,0.10,0.30,1.20,0.90,-
4,0.10 on 1 Street,0.10,0.40,1.20,0.80,-
5,0.10 on 1 Street,0.10,0.50,1.20,0.70,-
6,0.10 on 1 Street,0.10,0.60,1.20,0.60,-cross over point.
7,0.10 on 1 Street,0.10,0.70,1.20,0.50,-
8,0.10 on 1 Street,0.10,0.80,1.20,0.40,-
9,0.10 on 1 Street,0.10,0.90,1.20,0.30,-
10,0.20 on 1 Street,0.20,1.10,2.40,1.30,-could have gone 0.10 here for smaller R.O.I.
11,0.20 on 1 Street,0.20,1.30,2.40,1.10,-same as level 1
12,0.20 on 1 street,0.20,1.50,2.40,0.90,-
13,0.20 on 1 Street,0.20,1.70,2.40,0.70,-
14,0.20 on 1 Street,0.20,1.90,2.40,0.50,-
15,0.20 on 1 Street,0.20,2.10,2.40,0.30,-
16,0.30 on 1 Street,0.30,2.40,3.60,1.20,-could have gone 0.20 here for smaller R.O.I.
17,0.30 on 1 Street,0.30,2.70,3.60,0.90,-
18,0.30 on 1 Street,0.30,3.00,3.60,0.60,-
19,0.30 on 1 Street,0.30,3.30,3.60,0.30,-
20,0.40 on 1 Street,0.40,3.70,4.80,1.10,-
21,0.40 on 1 Street,0.40,4.10,4.80,0.70,-
22,0.40 on 1 Street,0.40,4.50,4.80,0.30,-possibly too small a return here.
23,0.50 on 1 Street,0.50,5.00,6.00,1.00,-
24,0.50 on 1 Street,0.50,5.50,6.00,0.50,-
25,0.60 on 1 Street,0.60,6.10,7.20,1.10,-
26,0.60 on 1 Street,0.60,6.70,7.20,0.50,-
27,0.70 on 1 Street,0.70,7.40,8.40,1.00,-
28,0.80 on 1 Street,0.80,8.20,9.60,1.40,-could be slowed down to 0.75 here.
29,0.90 on 1 Street,0.90,9.10,10.80,1.70,-
30,1.00 on 1 Street,1.00,10.10,12.00,1.90,-can go further if required.
[/csv]

Table limit for Street Bet at Bet Voyager No zero, is:- [attachimg=1]

[Chrisbis]

Question.

Can a Street at Bet Voyager No zero (or Standard European Table), sleep for Longer than 30 levels?

Should we track first to find a missing Street, or just Pick ONE Street, and go for it?

answers on a fag packet pls!

[Chrisbis]

I just established........yes they can Sleep Longer than 30 spins! 

Back to bread and dripping for me then........

[xxlakis]

When i was playing Winkels "win as much as you want but BV will take as much as he wants after that and even more" one DS sleeped for 63 spins.

[Chrisbis]

I have found the deeper U go into a game at BV, the worse (for You/Us that is), the results get.

My new tactic, since its so easy to do on-line, is Play & Reset.

Its Like Hit & Run, but with different coloured pants on!! LoL

[trebor]

I read somewhere the suggestion that RNG's including BV can work out your betting pattern after about 20 mins and counter it.

Robert

[Optimist]

Code Select Expand

I read somewhere the suggestion that RNG's including BV can work out your betting pattern after about 20 mins and counter it.


Sure it is possible. With BV you need to generate at least 60 spins and change systems. They generate spins before you bet but if they found you betting pattern they can generate spins against the pattern. If you change tactics every 60 spins they have no chance to cheat.

Regards

DL

[atlantis]

I read somewhere the suggestion that RNG's including BV can work out your betting pattern after about 20 mins and counter it.

Well one way to see if a system would have lost anyway is to play on BVNoZero with an unloseable bet eg: 3u on Low; 2u on 3rd DOZ and 1u on LINE 19-24. Now you can auto spin and record results and see if your system would have lost on paper. Since the software can have no idea of your betting system, if your system loses to the spun outcomes - then maybe the system needs looking at.
On the other hand if you do this and record strings of wins - then go and play for real and it loses then it could be just unlucky or "something else" going on....?

A.

[superman]

I read somewhere the suggestion that RNG's including BV can work out your betting pattern after about 20 mins and counter it

Hey Robert, it's true they could do that without any doubt BUT any reputable platform doesn't need to cheat, random catches us eventually, as I have said numerous times, I test against many different forms of Random() php, RXTreme, online RNG (playtech for speed) and the built in Random in the software I use to create the bots, I have even taken some methods onto LIVE tables and got my ar$e kicked, there is no difference whatsoever as far as I am concerned.

after about 20 mins and counter it

Those with experience of RX will know that most of the time you plug a method into RX, the earnings graph will go up and up before the inevitable drop, funny hey.

Maybe we just like to have something to blame.

[trebor]

Yes we like something to blame. All the same I use BV because it gives me a little more control. By generating 60 spins and changing strategy I feel happier. Doesn't stop the losing sessions though.   

Robert

[amk]

Great posts.........

Is it possible to bet RNG..............?

Can or could we outsmart a computer program............?

I think there is a chance...........

[Drazen]

Great posts.........

Is it possible to bet RNG..............?

Can or could we outsmart a computer program............?

I think there is a chance...........

Very wrong and sad idea



Regards

Drazen

[Chrisbis]

I think there is a chance...........

I think so too.
(in fact.................certain of it!)

Sorry to disappoint Drazen

[Drazen]

I think so too.
(in fact.................certain of it!)

Sorry to disappoint Drazen

Chrisbi mate. I heard something similar before from you and probably You mean on certain chances when you were betting on all 3 dozens with 30 steps of progression? Saying you will show them who is the boss  But they just swept you...

Lately i can't fail to notice you are synonym word for BV. don't get me offensive, just personal observation  from your posts and pictures. 

If you have an enemies and can't go against them, go with them, right? don't know why but on the dark side, they always have cookies... I hate them, because i just can't say no when they offer them 

Regards

Drazen

[Optimist]

Very wrong and sad idea



Regards

Drazen

I don't post often but sometimes I do.

Why you say so? looking at yours "entry forum" posts you thoughts where different.

Looking at the RNG (Roulette) table we are only limited by table limits. In other case we are 100% winners. It is much easier to beat (fair) RNG that roulette wheel. We have to agree that some super RNG is like roulette wheel. Does it it has memory - sure not. So what we got - frequency (here we get all the hit and run tactics because at real roulette wheel we can process 800 spins  per 10 hours) . and with RNG we can use more tactics (or systems). Warrior was right in his post that RNG beats every system in some stage because   in 1 mil or 5 mil numbers (or spins) you will find the number pattern which will kill every system designed for live wheel or lets say for short sessions.
So looks that hit and run exists???  :LoL
To beat RNG we have to use tracking ability (at least I think so). Tracking - it is bet selection and when I speak about bet selection against RNG I mean probabilities. What I mean! Playing against RNG we can "pass" many spins  so we can use use random deviation against random. At least I think so and it is the only way. We need hit ratio.

Regards  (sry for my English)
DL