ATTENTION ! Street system that passed 10.000 spins!

[RouletteExplorer]

Yes iggiv I also can see how much the  real life experience has helped you winning in every visit of ur Casino.

The things that you say are justified only for a person that hasn t finish the maths of the highschool education.

Real life expirience can not help you winning a mathemetical game....
Its like sayng that ig a man is jumping up and down everyday , eventualy he will fly
He can t fly because gravity can t let him.....this is exactly what is happening in Roulette....no system or no real gubling expirience can help in winning, because maths can t let it.....

If I had a little kid infront of me or a person with brain problem and I had to explain to them the why roulette can t be beaten (make steady profit over the years) i would give them this simple example.

We have 2 ppl. The one has a little rock and he is hidding it in his hand. The other person is trying to guess in which hand the little rock is. And they do this everyday. BUT the rules are like this : WHEN THE PERSON THAT IS PICKING HAND IS WINNING , HE IS WINNING 1 DOLLAR , BUT WHEN THE PERSON THAT IS HIDDING THE LITTLE ROCK IS WINNING ,HE IS WINNING 2 DOLLARS!!!!!!

So even if the person that is picking hand will be lucky and will be infront (in money) on the first lets say 2 or 3 days of playing, eventualy it is dead sure (mathimaticaly proven) that he will lose ALL the money he won and he will give more from his own pocket!

iggiv you haven t understood what maths really is...
Maths are ABSOLUTE , maths are ALWAYS telling the truth and are always sayng the same thing no matter how many years will pass....maths can t be altered ....
1+2 will ALWAYS be 3 . Its absolute.

That s why I am telling you that it seems clearly that you don t have the appropriate education in maths to be able to understand that REAL GAMBLING EXPIRIENCE can not help you alter the 1+2=3

If you want to ban me after this i really don t care.....
I really feel sad being in a forum with a moderator that hasn t understood the SIMPLE and ABSOLUTE things and as  speed say you are spreading disinformation because of ur luck of education and you are taking some other members down with you.... Its really so sad.

[RouletteExplorer]

"""earn more and lose less in long run"""

This is good in words...but in real play it can t be achived.

[Jeromin]

I'm looking at the graphs that "prove" that this system doesnt work and I don't see a problem making money with the pattern shown in the graphs. All you need is short term, local ups within most segments of the graph and a good stop loss for the few clear down sessions. Systems don't need to be net long term winners. I fact, they can be net winners and useless, since I am not going to sit for 100,000 spins straight ( a bot is a different story, but I understand online casinos ban bot use )

What I need is a system that in most instances has short term net positive balances at some point in the session, even with the help of a negative progression; the willingness to stop before those wins turn to lossess and a provision for sessions from hell, where recovery attemps put all previous winnings at risk. How many systems out there can yield a 1 unit profit at some point and no more than about half a dozen lossing session in a row?  Of course, you could look at the following spins and realize you'd given up a 15 or 20 unit profit. Can you live with that? If you can, that's a winning system for you. That same system could go on RXtreme and prove a net loser.  And it would make no difference, unless RX exactly replicates your playing style.

That's why my first instinct is always to look for a couple of virtual lossess and a slow progression. I have a problem with 4 sleepers turning into six in this particular case though, which is why I want to try  15 last spins as opposed to 12 and perhaps start only with 3 or 4 double streets. Will have to look into it.

Whatever the HG is, I suspect it will act like a mouse: always be sniffing, fast in , get the cheese, fast out, drop the cheese if the cat sees you and run for cover. Courage in roulette is not a virtue. All new players are corageous, optimistic and bold... I know I was.


Jeromin

[RouletteExplorer]

"""well my dad achieved for 40 years...he started his own bangles manufacturing unit from roulette earnings..he did it..may be i won't be able to do that....not my dad there are many people here who earn a living out of roulette from past 15 years"""

And why your dad  he isn t telling you his secret? 

""" the willingness to stop before those wins turn to lossess and a provision for sessions from hell, where recovery attemps put all previous winnings at risk. How many systems out there can yield a 1 unit profit at some point and no more than about half a dozen losing session in a row? """

For doing that you also need a system that is able to win in the long run.
This is what most of you can t understand in here !!!
Hit and Run can work ONLY if a system is able to be UP in the long run....and as you saw this one(like all) is failling.

[darrnyf]

well.if ur looking for a system that would win long term...then i think u should quit roulette...REx...or may be u should start learning roulette again from a scratch

[RouletteExplorer]

well....if you darrnyf are playing Roulette without a system that is able to win in the long run then I wish to u the minimun LOSES ! Because the loses are mathematical sure !
Or you should go back to highschool and this time try to study harder the simple maths.

[Robeenhuut]

"""well my dad achieved for 40 years...he started his own bangles manufacturing unit from roulette earnings..he did it..may be i won't be able to do that....not my dad there are many people here who earn a living out of roulette from past 15 years"""

And why your dad  he isn t telling you his secret? 

""" the willingness to stop before those wins turn to lossess and a provision for sessions from hell, where recovery attemps put all previous winnings at risk. How many systems out there can yield a 1 unit profit at some point and no more than about half a dozen losing session in a row? """

For doing that you also need a system that is able to win in the long run.
This is what most of you can t understand in here !!!
Hit and Run can work ONLY if a system is able to be UP in the long run....and as you saw this one(like all) is failling.

Hello

U should have more faith and conviction in the systems you post. Some of them are just impossible to test. If the system delivers for extended period of time just stay with it. Just observe always some patterns and never play in "automated mode".
U can always learn as u play and improve on it. There is no holy grail out there but anything f.....g close to it is good enough.

You just need a strong foundation you can build on.

Regards

[RouletteExplorer]

I kinda agree with you Robeenhut if this thing would exist but even a system that is close to holy grail doesn t exist...
They all losing in the rate of -2,7 that roulette is providing....

[darrnyf]

what about BV no zero REx?

[Robeenhuut]

I kinda agree with you Robeenhut if this thing would exist but even a system that is close to holy grail doesn't exist...
They all losing in the rate of -2,7 that roulette is providing....

hello

It is such a cliche.  So why bother?  People beat this game.  It can be done.
It is just a statistical figure and there is more to roulette than pure mathematics and
statistics.

regards

[hamsup_sotong]

ah dear jordan is back. Hi HI Hi again ....


regards
hamsup

[RouletteExplorer]

""" there is more to roulette than pure mathematics and
statistics."""

Ok teach me then .... what else is more in this game?

""ah dear jordan is back. Hi HI Hi again ...."""

irrelative

[superman]

but I understand online casinos ban bot use

Can you show us where you found this info, as far as I know the casinos have no problem with bot usage, as bot usage up to now just lets the casino win quicker and us lose quicker, would like to see that info mate.

unless RX exactly replicates your playing style

You will make people scared to buy RXtreme suggesting things like that, the internal RNG of RXTreme is not much different than any other RNG from any coding language, why would the creator of RXTreme want to have his software beat you? if you know different then again please inform us with facts as opposed to what you think or assume.

It can be done. It is just a statistical figure and there is more to roulette than pure mathematics and statistics

I think most will agree with that statement, personally I don't think ANY bet selection is any better than any other, most bet selections are built from knee jerk reactions to what you see happening, wether it's matrix formations or the nice colours on the marquee, we see what has ALREADY happened, so don't concentrate on anything that needs too much tracking, you have the same odds if you bet on spin 1 as you would have if you tracked for 20 spins and bet on spin 21, the Same Odds.

Hit and Run can work ONLY if a system is able to be UP in the long run

Again, good statement, if you formed a LWWWLLWWWWLWW test on RNG and did the same thing on a live wheel, the only difference would be ................................ the time it took to form each line. Every evening of last week I tested one method on table 1 @ dublinbet, besides being kicked off a lot as I overstayed my free play welcome, when I put the LLWWWW.... line on the same page as the RNG one, I can see zero difference, none whatsoever, neither platform had more losses in a row than the other, go figure. No wonder the authorities who test the RNG casino for their licence allow its use, its very very very close to the real deal, I know, there's going to be naysayers but hey the only reason most people think RNG is cheating is because you lose so fast, think about it, with RNG you can lose a bank in 10 seconds, 2 or 3 spins, but it would take about 4 minutes for the same on live wheels, its all about time, hit n run forms the same LWWLLWWW printouts as continual play, the fact you dont lose too often is you dont play often, whichj equates to pure luck that you sit down at the right time, the odds are identical, you'r kiding yourself.

As usual only my findings and thoughts, YMMV

[Hermes]

What about to turn it the opposite way to bet all coming streets instead of going one?
But the idea is not bad at all.
P.S. I didn't have time to read all the posts, my idea could be already mentioned.
At gambling, math has low lasting explicity. The games are obeying the laws of the nature, like 3/3 law etc.
Hermes

[iggiv]

hello

It is such a cliche.  So why bother?  People beat this game.  It can be done.
It is just a statistical figure and there is more to roulette than pure mathematics and
statistics.

regards

totally agree