• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Progression bets are nothing more than different size bets on different spins. You could get lucky and win big, or unlucky and lose even more.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

ATTENTION ! Street system that passed 10.000 spins!

Started by RouletteExplorer, Sep 22, 06:11 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

RouletteExplorer

Thank you Mad Max

Robeenhuut

"""Apparently u r ready 2 bet in one game until u get a hit no matter how far down u r."""

Exactly. I never posted a stop-loss.
The stoploss will be determined after the 1.000.000 spin testing


"""I wonder how u came up with this figure because its plainly impossible 2 have such a numbers. """

Of cource it is possible because we are speaking here about a 10.000 test.... If the numbers were favouring the system even more , the profit could be higher.
Only the 1.000.000 spin test can show the real face of every system.


Only  a FLAT BET system it is certain that it will lose after 10.000 spins.
A System with progression can win in 10.000....as everybody knows , Turbo Genious has posted some systems that had pass even 15.000 spins




What we need is new thinking...

kingsroulette


RouletteExplorer

kingsroulette what you haven t understood is that we are tracking after EVERY SPIN , the LAST 12 SPINS and we are constantly looking which streets are UNHIT and which street won.....
This kind of tracking makes changes on the streets all the time....
So that s why in 1 singe spin we can have a winning street and a new unhit street.

So the problem of your understanding is that you haven t realise HOW we track.
The 1 way and the easiest one is with Roulette Extreme software that is doing it automaticaly.(I have already given the instractions of how to set it up)
The 2nd way which is manual is the way that Skakus posted:

Best way to track this is once you set up the bet after the first 12 numbers, just keep an eye on the number that drops off the list each spin, then quickly scan the current 12 to see if that number, or any of that number's street mates are still in the list. If not, you add in the street, and add 1 to the others.

Now I am sure that your confusion is solved.
What we need is new thinking...

MadMax

For those who don´t have RX I have attached a little Excel-tracker for this system.
You just have to enter the numbers (not streets) into the yellow collumn. The sheet automatically tracks always the last 12 numbers. In the upper part you get shown which street(s) to bet. (When starting, all Streets are shown as ready to bet, because no Street has appeared so far.) Easy to use. But there are only the streets considered. Betsize must be done manually.
Good luck to all.

RouletteExplorer

Mad Max you are  God mate !
Thanks very much for the work and for posting the Excel-tracker  :thumbsup:

I hope we had more members in here that like contributing more.

I also hope that the Excel - tracker is correct with no mistakes.
What we need is new thinking...

MadMax

Thank you for your kind words, but all the credits are due to you for bringing your systems to public.
I just try to help the way I can.
And don´t worry about mistakes, the tracker works so simple, that there is almost no space for mistakes (almost, cause we as roulette players know: nothing is impossible  ;D)
But as far as I have tested it out, I couldn´t find an error.
So, will know test your system a bit more with real live spins and hope the best.

Cheers.

RouletteExplorer

Thanks MadMax
I checked the Excel - tracker and it works perfectly  ;)

What we need now is a Prpgrammer to test the system in depth
What we need is new thinking...

RouletteExplorer

VLS I see you are watching the Topic.

Can you give ur opinion about the system? Ur opinion counts a lot to me.  :)
What we need is new thinking...

Robeenhuut

Quote from: RouletteExplorer on Sep 23, 12:05 PM 2011
Thank you Mad Max

Robeenhuut

"""Apparently u r ready 2 bet in one game until u get a hit no matter how far down u r."""

Exactly. I never posted a stop-loss.
The stoploss will be determined after the 1.000.000 spin testing


"""I wonder how u came up with this figure because its plainly impossible 2 have such a numbers. """

Of cource it is possible because we are speaking here about a 10.000 test.... If the numbers were favouring the system even more , the profit could be higher.
Only the 1.000.000 spin test can show the real face of every system.


Only  a FLAT BET system it is certain that it will lose after 10.000 spins.
A System with progression can win in 10.000....as everybody knows , Turbo Genious has posted some systems that had pass even 15.000 spins


Hello

Ok.  Somebody has here a problem with an elementary grade math.  Correct me f im wrong here. Each  game takes at least 13 spins  so if u have 1.7u profit per unit u win
22u in each game ON AVERAGE. This is almost MAXIMAL profit u can have in one game.
So yr figures r telling me that u won EACH game played at almost maximum profit per game.

I suggest b4 u post any figures here u go through them carefully n do it properly.
Apropo stop loss its clear here that this system wont work f u DO NOT PUT STOP LOSS  at relatively low figure  4 example around 40 or max 50. No 1 Mil spins needed.
;D

Regards
Matt

RouletteExplorer

your calculations are completely wrong ....but even if you had made the correct ones, the averages can t be made for any system in only 10.000 spins.
I think you are new in Roulette exploring and testing so that s why you think like that....

And I also don't know why you are trying to make a bad mood in my topic....
If you don't like it or if you don't beleave it then You are free not to use it:)

Most of the old members here , they like it and this shows a lot !

I never claimed that it will win on the long run(no system on planer ever did that so far)....I and all the people in here HOPE that it will be good on the long run.

From now on every irrelative or insulting post of yours will be deleted in order for the topic not to be fill with nonsence.
Thanks :thumbsup:
What we need is new thinking...

Robeenhuut

Quote from: RouletteExplorer on Sep 23, 01:58 PM 2011
your calculations are completely wrong ....but even if you had made the correct ones, the averages can t be made for any system in only 10.000 spins.
I think you are new in Roulette exploring and testing so that s why you think like that....

And I also don't know why you are trying to make a bad mood in my topic....
If you don't like it or if you don't beleave it then You are free not to use it:)

Most of the old members here , they like it and this shows a lot !

I never claimed that it will win on the long run(no system on planer ever did that so far)....I and all the people in here HOPE that it will be good on the long run.

From now on every irrelative or insulting post of yours will be deleted in order for the topic not to be fill with nonsence.
Thanks :thumbsup:

U can delete my posts anytime u want.

Regards
Matt

RouletteExplorer

Thanks man.  :thumbsup:
I never delete any negative posts....only some insulting ones... ;)
There are already some negative posts in here...and non of them are deleted.
What we need is new thinking...

Robeenhuut

Quote from: RouletteExplorer on Sep 23, 02:33 PM 2011
Thanks man.  :thumbsup:
I never delete any negative posts....only some insulting ones... ;)
There are already some negative posts in here...and non of them are deleted.

U deleted my posts already.  Just face up  2 some criticism. :o
 
Regards
Matt

RouletteExplorer

I deleted the post because it was highly INSOLTING !
If you want to play just go to an other Topic....this one is sirious.

Thanks  :thumbsup:
What we need is new thinking...

Jeromin

MadMax,

brilliant tracker! Must learn Excel programming ... :(
Any chance for a slight alteration? a tracker of the last 15 spins, as opposed to last 12. I prefer waiting to risking and am wondering if there might be an advantage to waiting for 4  unhit streets on 15 spins.

Regards,

Jeromin
The better the gambler, the worse the man.  Publilius Syrus

-