THE SLEEPING TWELVES

[warrior]

An idea i had ,and testing have not seen this yet, but it could be tested on rx if someone has it.
Track 19 spins the dozen that has the most sleepers qualify meaning 6 and up if a tie just wait for a qualifyer, then bet that dozen for 19 spins ,tested 2000 live spins ,have not seen 10 losses in a row yet , there  you have something new .

[warrior]

When playing on your dozen once its qualified i keep tracking for the next cycle so i will have my next qualifier for my next game ,I'm averaging around 5 to 7 hits  within 19 spins i have a prog. that i use starting from the min. to the max ,starting from betting 2 lines to make up the dozen all the way to the inside numbers until i reach the max progression lets not forget that once the outside progression reaches the max you still have streets lines corners splits and straight # the  progression can go hi ,hopefully we never reach the point may luck be with us.

[Jeromin]

How about waiting for a LL at the start of the sequence, then do a

1 1 2 3 4 6 9 13
losing 39 on a 10 L.

Looks interesting, there's definitely a balancing effect going on, and not very long term at that. A bit like the reds and blacks; since numbers are divided into columns on Wiesbaden, roughly 20 spins long, it's easy to see: two consecutive columns with a dominant colour,  (5/4 number difference ), nearly every time it switches to the other colour, and if they're level, it switches the following column.

Jeromin

[Jeromin]

So I start testing from first of this month on Wiesbaden, and on day 2, table 2, fifth column starting with "26, 33..",  four first dozen numbers in 19, takes 13 steps from "20" to get a first dozen again. That said, most times the wins come quite quickly. Anyway, small sample testing by hand is probably pointless.

Jeromin

[Optimist]

In a sample of 30 million spins the longest a single dozen sleeps for is 15.  However if you take any 12 unique numbers to be a dozen you will see them sleep for 20 or more spins.

Hi Birdhands,

I think u made a mistake. Maybe you mean dozen repeat ?

DL

[birdhands]

Oh yes. Oops.  My mistake; Warrior, please feel free to remove that post.  Thanks for pointing that out.

[warrior]

I think if this was tested on a big scale would be the only way to really know, takes a while with paper and pen.

[Jeromin]

I think if this was tested on a big scale would be the only way to really know, takes a while with paper and pen.

I think the only type of productive roulette forum would be one where an in house tester tests every system, publishes the results and settles debates ( with a proviso for exception of Hit and Run systems, of course    ) Either that or start learning Visual Basic myself.

Jeromin

[superman]

where an in house tester tests every system, publishes the results

I used to do that, but as many of the tests failed I got branded negative or a maths head just trying to find fault, trust me, if I thought a system had any merit on paper I would go away and code it then test it against 3 different forms of random, my softwares inbuilt random function, playtech for speed and lastly either betvoyager OR dublinbet live wheel.

Some people don't want the truth as its usually dissapointing and they take it personally!!

Now, I just plug away on my own, still searching.

[Jeromin]

I used to do that, but as many of the tests failed I got branded negative or a maths head just trying to find fault, trust me, if I thought a system had any merit on paper I would go away and code it then test it against 3 different forms of random, my softwares inbuilt random function, playtech for speed and lastly either betvoyager OR dublinbet live wheel.

Some people don't want the truth as its usually dissapointing and they take it personally!!

Now, I just plug away on my own, still searching.

I'll make sure to let you know If I have something with potential. What kind of fool gives out to a tester when they're so few and necessary? Testers are like chefs: always flatter them if they cook for you for free, even if they have a bad day.
But then again, would I want to share a Holy Grail? 

Jeromin

[superman]

But then again, would I want to share a Holy Grail?

Probably not, but you wouldn't know you had one until it was thoroughly tested, I have coded privately for many on this and other forums, confidentiality is always guaranteed.

[warrior]

30000 went to 8 6 times, another 70000 anyone on want to code this please, paper and pen WARRIOR very tired

[Tomla021]

so track 19 spins, start betting for the least hit one 19 times? am I following?

[warrior]

so track 19 spins, start betting for the least hit one 19 times? am I following?

Yes thats correct.

[StackBundles]

Did 2 quick test as i am tired to aint been bed since the other night!

i got

WWLLLLLLWLWLLLLLLWLW
LLLLWLWWLLWLLWLLWWW