Birds of a Feather

[keel44]

Hello all,

This system is based on the theory that certain even chances will sleep for a while then catch up.

The first thing we will do is chart 16 spins.  We will chart the spins as  L/H  O/E  R/B.  Example:   4    (LEB)
That is all we need to write down on a note card.

When we are done with that, we will look at all the possible pairings.  There are 12 of them:

H R
H B
H O
H E
L R
L B
L O
L E
R O
R E
B O
B E

We will count how many times the even chances pair up in these 16 spins.  Here is a real life example:

H R - 5
H B - 5
H O - 4
H E - 6
L R - 0
L B - 6
L O - 2
L E - 4
R O - 2
R E - 3
B O - 4
B E - 7

Looking at the lowest amounts, we can deduce that the 3 even chances we will bet are Low, Red, and Odd

We start the betting and stop the tracking. (unless you want to)

* We start with 1 unit on each and +1 on all 3 after a NET loss.  -1 after a NET win.  

* You will reset when balance reaches a new high point or EVEN

* Anytime you lose all 3, you raise +2 after every NET loss hereafter.

* Aim for about 15 - 25 units profit.  Stop and retrack

* Don't bet for too many spins.  No more than 30-40 spins.  Stop and retrack.

* A session bankroll should be 150 units in case things get hairy

[keel44]

On each nonzero spin there are 3 winning even-chance pairs.  (Example: 7  RO - LO - RL)  So on 16 nonzero spins there are a total of 48 profitable even-chance pairs.  There are 12 different possible pairings on any spin.  

So in a perfect world, each of the 12 combination's would hit 4 times each.  When we track our spins and see combination's with 0, 1, 2, we are behind the normal rate.  We should expect a higher rate during the next 20-30 spins.

We are covering 3 of these combination's at once, and for all 3 combination's to continue to stay behind is a rarity (in my opinion).  You couple that with a progression, we might just a have a winning system here.

[keel44]

I just finished a real life example.  Sorry, I did not record the actual numbers during my tracking, but I do have the finished pairings after 16 nonzero spins:

H R - 2
H B - 3
H O - 3
H E - 2
L R - 7
L B - 4
L O - 6
L E - 5
R O - 7
R E - 2
B O - 2
B E - 5

I played High, Red, Even

I won 25 units easily.  I should have stopped at 20.  I wanted to push it to 25, and then I had some struggle.  In the end, I got there.  It was amazing how many times ALL 3 hit at the same time.



KEEL

[ewarwoowar]

hello keel, thanks for this.

what about a progression for betting the actual numbers in the categories?

ie high red even = 30,32, 34,36.
obviously we're limiting the opportunities, but you're qualifying them in your tracking.
would be interesting to see how this plays out.

cheers.

[keel44]

On those numbers you just mentioned.  They all hit in that particular test run.  All within 25 spins.

I have not considered this, but you could be right.  Only time will tell.

KEEL

[Boo_Ray]

thanks.. I will test it out when I got some time

[jordan69]

Thanks for the idea man.

Interesting system.
Deserves more tests for sure.
I like the EC'S :)

As always, we have to determine a realistic target win (not to greedy)
and a clear stop loss.
Cheers.

Jordan69

[keel44]

Hello keel, thanks for this.

what about a progression for betting the actual numbers in the categories?

ie high red even = 30,32, 34,36.
obviously we're limiting the opportunities, but you're qualifying them in your tracking.
would be interesting to see how this plays out.

cheers.

O.K.  I have tried 2 test runs using this idea.  It works great.  I hit many times when betting the 4 to 5 numbers straight up.  Flat bets.  I stopped at +67 one time and +109 another time.  They both would have been profitable my original way as well.

I know it is very early in the testing phase.  It seems to be a winner of a system. 


KEEL

[ewarwoowar]

ok, i've just run through quick tests using live spins.

some of the number groups have 4 numbers, some  have 5, so different progression needed.

session 1:
number group HRE
spins: 6
profit: 12 units

session 2:
number group HBO
spins: 13
profit 16 units

session 3:
number group HBO
spins: 9
profit 28 units

session 4:
number group LRE
spins: 1
profit 32 units

session 5:
number group HRE
spins: 2
profit 28 units

far too early, but enough promise to warrant a further look 

[keel44]

Great job.  Great results.  I take it you tracked the numbers correctly.  16 spins?  Does not have to be exactly 16.

I wouldn't chase too long for a hit.  Better to accept a smaller loss and move on.  You don't have to stop after first hit neither.

Have you tried my original method?


KEEL

[ewarwoowar]

no, i haven't tried your original method 
it was just something that struck me as i read your post.
in testing, i was surprised how quickly the numbers came in. i know it's early days.

i tracked for 16 spins, except for the one time i tracked for 17 because a zero came in.

cheers.

[ewarwoowar]

another 5 test sessions, same selection criteria as above.

session 1:
number group LBE
spins 1
profit 31 units

session 2:
number group: LBO
spins 5
profit 16 units

session 3:
number group: LRO
spins 3
profit 21 units

session 4:
number group: HBE
spins 7
profit 32 units

session 5:
number group: HBO
spins 9
profit 28 units

[Kattila]

Good  method guys Keel and  Ewarwoowar. Keep testing.  



Try this hibrid ,too.
Same way like Ewarwoowar, wait  12-16 spins,but  bet 6 numbers.

R1   B1   R2   B2   R3   B3  

1     2     14   13   25   26    
3     4     16   15   27   28    
5     6     18   17   30   29    
7     8     19   20   32   31    
9     10   21   22   34   33    
12   11   23   24   36   35    

[dennisbelle]

Kattila,
    When you say "Anytime you lose all 3, you raise +2 after every NET loss hereafter" do you mean to raise +2 on the very next spin or do you mean to raise +2 on all of the spins that have a net loss until the next reset?
     Also on your sample in reply #2 you had 4 combinations that had 2 spins each.  In this instance you left out the "B" since you can't bet R & B at the same time.  How do you decide which one to leave out?
Thanks,
Dennis

[Kattila]

Dennis  you have to ask Keel44,   is not my system. 

Cheers.