The advantage of the maths+possibilities

[Jordan]

Ok here we go again.

1st of all I would like to say that I am happy that we are all in a forum that it is peacefull without the negativity of idiot members.
But the problem is that it is not an ACTIVE forum...If someone had experienced the VLS forum before 2 years he would see that when a member was posting a system ,the eother members were jumping and testing the system till failure!
I really need this attitude in this forum too!

Anyway I am cracking my head these days to find the best and the safest way to take the advantage of the maths+possibilities on the ECs of Roulette.

I think that the way that this system is made is the only and the best way to do it!

the system:
1)We track 50 spins...
2)We see which of the 3 ECs has left more behind!(eg if we have 24 red and 26 black,20 odd and 30 evens ,25 High and 25 Low...we will use the ODD Ec because it has left more behind than all the others)
3)we will also track the Runs and the Changes of this ECs.
4)We will be betting in every spin this particular EC that has left behind and it needs the recovery of the Imbalance!
5)If in these 50 spins(that we make our tracking) the Runs were less than the changes (in the ODD and Evens) we will be betting 2 chips when we have an ODD and 1 chip when we will have an EVEN(all the betting as I told will be in the ODD becauae it is left behind!)

The theoritical advantage behind the system.

1)We need more Odds to hit because of the Imbalance
2)we need more RUNS to hit because of the Imbalance

So betting always the 1 chip on the ODD we are in the correct place and betting  2 chips on the ODD(when we have an odd) we are also in the correct place but with a better advantage to HIT because the RUNS was also imbalanced!

Please test this system!It may be a nice long term winner...
As always we are targetting little but steady profits...

ps.If when we will be betting ,the RUNS will come even as the Changes,then we are continuing betting in the ODD(if it is still behind)but with only 1 chip.

I think with a 30 chips BR we are OK!
I made my contribution to all of you
Now please show the gratitude with a little tests

I have made 6 tests by now...all with succes...and never with a down more than 10 chips inside the session.

My personal sceptic is to have a system that we will be going in the Casino with a little BR and almost always leave with a little progit.
This little profit will become BIG profit when we will have build a respeactive and safe BR and we will be betting with HIGHER valieu of chips....
So everytime that we will make 3Xtiimes our starting BR we will be betting double valieu chips.

CU

[Jordan]

Oh! I forgot to explain to you how we will know in every session the Winning target!

The winning target is also coming through MATHS and possibilities!

eg. If we have 30 Blacks and 20 REDS = 10 points deference!
now if we have(in these 50 spins) 23 RUNS and 27 changes = 4 points deference

So we add the deferences 10+4=14  and we devide it by 2 so 14/2 = 7

So our winninng (expectation) TARGET from this particular session will be +7 chips

SAFE and EASY..NO guess work! all mechanical with exact RULES!

ps,The greater IMbalance=the greater winning rate/chances!(at least in Theaory)
I know it may be a borring system with little win in chips,but IF someone wants to play Rouletet Professional,he must know that Nothing will be easy!
Now if you prefare to work in your day jobs 8 hours dayly then its your choise...personaly I don't!

Can u all imagine having built a BR that will alow us to play with 20 $ chips?
in the aboce session we will make 20$ X 7 chips =140 $
if we are betting with 50$ = 350 $
It can t be more safe and reasonable!..in every spin we are betting 1 or 2 chips..No progressions at all!
please tell me do you like the theory of it?
will you test it?

[keel44]

I can try and test it.  Tests are very easily done if you don't mind RNG or random.org.

I don't think they make one bit of difference.



KEEL

[Jordan]

My friend I am always saying that RNG aren t OK...but what can I say to u if u insist so much!
I just can t take these tests as genuine....
U know there is also RX that can download millions of real spins

[albalaha]

Dear Jordon,
                 Sorry to say but this technique of you have no merit. Ball and wheel has no memory or eyes. As per my law of uneven distribution, in a short run, uneven results of numbers, sectors, dozens etc. are obvious and the mainreason of house to win more than it loses. If as per your presumption, 45 blacks and 50 reds have appeared within last 95 spins, then next 5 spin as per you is likely to give 5 blacks, have no logic.
                                         I think, no EC system has any merit, because they just want to come out of net with about 50% chances of winning. Think differently dear.

[F_LAT_INO]

                                         I think, no EC system has any merit, because they just want to come out of net with about 50% chances of winning. Think differently dear.

And I also think that you don't know what you are
talking about.Am playing EC for years,on every day basis,on
50% chances,and averagely am winning 24 session out of 30.
Ever heard of En Prison rules on French table,with 2 croupiers?

[albalaha]

Don't teach me FLAT INO because I write e-books on roulette and know all the terminology and techniques. Someone teaching EC bets is either a fool himself or very cunning because there is always a number that arises out of every spin and not any color. This is not roulette system but like flipping a coin, you will win for sure but atlast lose all. There can be no successful system for roulette with ECs. When someone selects say red he feels that he has covered almost half the wheel but he forgets that 19 numbers (18 black numbers +0) which are scattered all over the wheel is ready top kill you in 19 different ways.
                 

[F_LAT_INO]

Don't teach me FLAT INO because I write e-books on roulette and know all the terminology and techniques. Someone teaching EC bets is either a fool himself or very cunning because there is always a number that arises out of every spin and not any color. This is not roulette system but like flipping a coin, you will win for sure but atlast lose all. There can be no successful system for roulette with ECs. When someone selects say red he feels that he has covered almost half the wheel but he forgets that 19 numbers (18 black numbers +0) which are scattered all over the wheel is ready top kill you in 19 different ways.
                 

You,man,are very ignorant/related to EC bets/and again you are mentioning 0--even thought I have pointed out that am playing EC on En Prison tables.
It's not like flipping a coin,but long years experience and rutine my dear friend,of which I'm making my existence for over 40 years.Your above post proves to me that you are very cunning young man who see your chance of coning people into a scam that you are
preaching about your knowledge about a roulette,but so far you have shown nothing,ONLY EMPTY CUNNING WORDS AS A BAIT FOR YOUR FUTURE VICTIMS.

[Maui13]

Jordan,    I think this is a cool system. Reason for that, is that you ABUSE the fact so well that the system has to come down even out the EC!!!!!!

I just did 1 test quickly...(and I know many people aren't fans of RNG...but this is what I want to beat) and it seems to work very nice! Was only a fun account, but fact of the matter...worked first time around!!!

I will be testing this with a live account....in due time!

Thank for this, will give feedback once done!

Regards,

M

[Maui13]

Ok, tried it again on RNG wheel but different casino. Again worked perfectly! This time I spotted something. There is some system where they say "Force the 0" almost similar to this.

*PS. I have only been playing R/B and not the other bets as mentioned*  ...tracked 50 spins, found that R was behind with 5 numbers. So I started placing bets on R. If if fails I just double up. I then tried to ride the win out, because every R I bet, a B fell, doubled my bet, then won. So black remained in front.

So I tried to use this to my advantage, playing R, again. B fell, doubled again and won. So black was still in front with 5.

I carried on like this until they almost leveled out and stopped!

Won all my bets. (I know I know, just fun account but still...surely there is something behind this)

Regards

M

[Hermes]

Be careful! Once I played in Casino Niagara SicBo 3 dice small/big something like L/H at roulette. For over hour big was a winner and we bet on it and made some money. After more than hour friend betting with me told me that it is time to bet on small because balance must to come. And really small caught up for about 20 round but after this the big became again leader and we start to lose money. I changed back to big and big was coming as a winner for the whole evening! I took home $200. There is a message in it: betting on losers will make you a loser. Bet only on trend which is durable not on hunches that it must come balance soon because balance could come after 3 days of playing. Let the trend to dictate the pace not your brain! I would rather bet on winners because they are obvious.
Hermes

[albalaha]

Very true Hermes,
                        no system for EC but just go with trends.

[Maui13]

True, BUT should we not be careful with every single system we try as none of them are bulletproof?
I'm just saying that if you take the house edge into considertaion (0) and that law of even distribution, you're bound to come out, almost even?

Am I incorrect in saying this???

I've seen many stats and H/L , O/E or B/R most of the time 2 of the 3 almost balance out at 50 %

So this method to me is as good as any....

Regards,

M

[F_LAT_INO]

Only playing every day on the very same wheel....from start to finish.
Few years back was playing---red/odd versus black/even,was lots of many
in minus,but continued to play and after--SEVERAL WEEKS--
the two have leveled up.