• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

CODE 4 Played DC Style

Started by woods101, Nov 04, 07:51 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

amk

Amazing post GLC,

Had a little inspiration for your friend perhaps.......

1c2b1a3a3c1c      once we have a two wide pattern repeat  1c  we bet that it won't repeat on the
1c 3b3b2c1a1c     next line

OR

2b3c3a2b
2b1a3c2b

ANONYMOUS

this is very interesting, but something like this would be very difficult to test. now what if you were to use only one bankroll for all of them

For example lets say i decide to track 4 different systems each requiring 26 units for a full progression and my triggers would look something like the above betting against

2ab3
2ab3
------- bet this line wont be a triple   and as i wait for that one ill watch another system for

a3b1
a3b1
------   so now if i make 7 hits on each system i will have made 28 units so all i need from each system is 7-1 to be on top... on an eventual loss i raise it to 2 units for a 52 unit bankroll on all systems, not just the one, for 12 total wins ( 3 on each) perhaps my logic is flawed, but i dont see how i wouldnt be able to get a high strike rate with those bets.

ANONYMOUS

^ one of the above systems would have to lose within the very next three hits to lose the progression

also one interesting variation would be dc played with even chances even/odd high/low red /black all used simultaneously, mad streaks of just red or just even dont hurt you when you combine all ec's would look something like this

1EHR  2ELB  3OLR
1EHB  2OLR  3OHB
1EHB
1---- BET AGAINST THREE EHB FORMING IN SAME COLUMN only 7units 

amk

I think your flown ANONYMOUS, you just have to get some paper test down to get it to the next level.

Have a few questions but I see what your trying to do.

Could you apply it to the method I just described for GLC?

Each time we play there will be different sequence lengths

1b2c3c1b         sequence length 4 patterns  1b   2c  3c    1b
1b1a3a1b


2c3a3b1b2a3b2c    sequence length  7 patterns
2c1b2b1b3c3b2c

ETC

Ofcourse it will happen that a pattern sequence repeats however, because we continually keep changing sequence length bets there is a good chance that we evade a repeat occurring in that particular group. From the coaching I have received from the "math guys" it will be evident that after playing a certain group for a length of time you will encounter a repeat. But I think you could get far ahead of things..........

ANONYMOUS

what do you mean by you think im flown? yes i agree, a paper test is in order.  essentially what i am doing is waiting for the inevitable loss and then betting it wont lose again directly after. so essentially for this we would wait for

1b2c3c1b
1b2c3c1b
---bet here that it wont be 1b  and 1b again at the end for a triple

what if we look at this

1b2c3c1b
2c1b3b2a
3b1a2c3a
2a1a1b1a
 
bet against a third repeat on the diagonal for 8units, on a loss wait for another trigger and do 4-12

amk

Hello ANONYMOUS,

I spent most of last summer looking into your last approach. I meant your flowing as in your coming up with good approaches to the game.

In live continues play the method I described looks like this.


1b
2c3c1b                                   first game
1b1a2b3a1c2c3c3c2b               end of first game/beginning of second game
       2b3a3b1b2a2c3c21c1b      end of second game/beginning of third game
                     1b 3c2c2a3a1a     


For me this is more relevant as I have not yet looked into this.

ANONYMOUS

at which point do you stop and reset?  also suppose you have an 8 unit requirement which is what it looks like we can do 8 different set ups or systems whatever u want to call it, they each only have to hit ONCE to cover your bankroll, so as long as you dont lose on the first shot of any of them your covered right off the bat everything else is profit.

                        1b
                      2c 3b
                    1b 2b 3a
                   3a 2a 1b 3b
                  2a 3c 3b 3a 2a

make a new pyramid and bet a different pattern  you are only limited by your imagination

amk

Could you explain your progression and when you are betting in a short summary.

I can't see exactly how your betting concerning gaining so many units in your other games game.

Looked into the pyramid a while ago. JohnLegend felt it was a good system but he had enough to play with and did not continue on with it.




ANONYMOUS

yes i believe it was kattila that brought up the pyramid idea.  in terms of the other systems im not gaining that many units im just using a different perspective.   i walk into the casino with 650 dollars, 26 quarters  so now i look at the roulette wheel(s) and start tracking several systems waiting for something that looks like the following

1a2b  2a3c  3b2c
1a3b  2b2c  3b2a
          2c3c
          2c3c* ( trigger)
          2------ here i bet against a triple  2c3c   i track several of these simultaneously if i  win its 1 unit with 26 at risk so now i win and i have 27u in my pocket I dont bet that system anymore i stop tracking it and wait for the others to show up with a trigger  until each one hits once so if im tracking 5 systems thats a total of +5 units  each system has to only hit once. on the same bankroll of 26 units  each system  has to hit 5 times to get 25 units. if each system has better than 5-1 strikerate then i am in profit. 

If one loses, i switch to 2-6-18 for 52 units total  on all systems regardless of which one loses,
so if each system hits 3 times at 2 units each x 5 =30 units gained you recover the previous loss so one of the systems would have to lose within the next 3 attempts in order to lose the entire progression, if the strike rate is as strong as i think it is, this should be no problem.

ANONYMOUS

so this morning i woke up with this thought, why not play divide and conquer, and on a loss use code 4 to recover the loss then back to dc until another loss then back to code 4 to recover..  thats just a basic example. instead of dc you can use the one you just posted amk it uses the same amount of units, but instead of using the same system to recover switch to a different one to recover that has higher odds of winning. dc 8-1 code 4 80-1... see what im getting at here?

suppose i use dc, then on a loss play dc code 4 style, but playing against a triple as i stated before, then if that were to lose before covering 8 units then i would go to something like code 4 and wait for something like 1a2b 1a2b and bet against that happening third time until i recover then its back down to dc.

i can even change the unit size so dc would be 1-3 then the  next system with 2-6-18  then the next with 4-12-36-108  380 unit total, aim for 20 units a day  to recover the first loss you need to hit 4 times on the second system, and if it goes to the third you need to hit like 15 times with odds like that i can definitely see a lot of wins before an eventual loss,

maybe you can even skip the second step and just play the third  so it would be 1-3 and 2-6-18-52

i believe that this is the way to go for me personally. im going to run some tests and see which way im going to go, in 9 days im going down to the casinos to implement the one i choose. any input would be appreciated.

ANONYMOUS

essentially what im getting at is using one system to play and another system to recover the loss of the first, then back to the first system, second system is only for recovery purposes.

Kattila

Hi ANONYMOUS,
maybe you try/test this idea  Two ID ( see excel file)
about bet on two inside dozens, find your own triggers/way to play this.
I am sure inside groups are much better than outside groups ( personal
opinion/experience).

There is another one (inside 24 ) .


cheers

ANONYMOUS

thanks kattila, are those numbers based on single zero? i really can only use american double zero unfortunately for me.. i was testing inside numbers in these groups for double 00

group 1: 3, 24, 36, 13, 1, 00, 27, 10, 25, 29, 12, 8

group2: 7, 11, 30, 26, 9, 28, 0, 2, 14, 35, 23, 4

group 3: 15, 34, 22, 5, 17, 32, 20, 19, 31, 18, 6, 21, 33, 16

seems to work quite well actually, not sure if that is just my imagination though?

ANONYMOUS

I came up with something that is extremely strong, that is based on some of the principles i mentioned in earlier posts. It's in its final development stages, it will also require patience, but not too much. I will be going live with real money in 4-5 days and then i will post it up here in a new thread. I am confident it will be one of the best, ever.

subby

How did you get on with real money tries?
Regards
Subby

-