CODE 4 Played DC Style

[Chrisbis]

Try the above chris and get on a live wheel. I have to say if your getting sent packets of ten numbers at a time this in no way guarantees trust of an rng. Your still easy to read and easy to knobble.

Sorry Ronnie, but your just plain wrong.................. 

[reveal]
Nobbling me is a lot easier that nobbling the numbers at BV.
[/reveal]

Tho I will have a look, esp after I have been sent this email from Castle Casino (ViG wheel)
[reveal]
From: David Merry <david@castlecasino.com>
To: 'Christ<chrisbis36@yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, 12 November 2011, 12:05
Subject: RE: MEGA BONUS - Get a 50% re-deposit bonus at Castle Casino!

Hi Christopher,

Very observant and I apologise for the error, it appears I should have proof read this better before approving it!

As you have been an observant player I’ll give you one better, an exclusive 125% bonus on any deposit you make up to £100 today. The wagering requirements are as standard, you can brush up on these here: link:://:.castlecasino.com/promotions/wagering-requirements.

If you want to go with this just let me know. Thanks for pointing out the error again, thankfully the mistake didn’t say 1000% .

Regards,
David

From: Christ[mailto:chrisbis36@yahoo.com]
Sent: 11 November 2011 19:52
To: david.merry@castlecasino.com
Subject: Re: MEGA BONUS - Get a 50% re-deposit bonus at Castle Casino!

David.
Are U sure U 'PROOF' read this email over and over and over once again, before U sent it out, or is there a PRIZE for the customer who finds the deliberate error!!!!....?

How come in one sentence, Ur giving 50% away, and the next one Ur then giving 100% away?

Its either one or the other, can not be both!!

Come one David... sort it out before the lawyers are all over U like FLIES!!!

Regards Ur Ever observant Chris (aka ***********)

P.S. I'll take the 100% if its on offer, But U don't mention the conditions do U???

cheers!

From: David Merry <david.merry@castlecasino.com>
To: chrisbis36@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, 11 November 2011, 18:00
Subject: MEGA BONUS - Get a 50% re-deposit bonus at Castle Casino!

Come back for a huge 50% re-deposit bonus Chris!

Hello Chris!
How are you?
The live dealers miss you! We are so keen to have you come back and continue playing our entertaining live dealer casino that  we would like to offer you a staggering re-deposit bonus! Deposit again at CastleCasino.com and we will add another 100% on top, that means that if you deposit £100 we will magically turn it into £150 free of charge! This offer is only around for this week, so make sure you claim it quickly!
Remember that our live games suite operates 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. That means you can log-on, interact with the dealers and win BIG any time of the day!
Want to claim? Make your deposit and email the cashier department stating code 'EMAIL 50 PERCENT' and we will do the rest for you!
Your username is *********, if you also require your password just get in contact.
Have a great weekend,
David Merry - Casino Manager
:.castlecasino.com


Castlecasino.com pride ourselves on having a no spam policy.


[/reveal]

[woods101]

Fair doos mate. Each to theirs etc. I have a point that is made by the second half of the above mentioned method. We look for patterns in randomness and pray they last in the hope of capitalising on them. Maybe the opposite is better. When discovering a pattern, we bet upon it not continuing. This is more certain. Like waves on an ocean we see cycles form and move and then die out and disperse back into the water. This is what we capitalise on. Look for patterns within manageable betting options, i.e. dozens and columns as example. The more complex the better. When we see a pattern over a certain number of spins all beit spread out, we play against it repeating.

[Chrisbis]

Randomness just isn't like that at all mate.

Random is designed to F*** U over as a friend of mine says (i'm too polite to repeat!)

So, what U have to do, is get one over on random, and as J.L. does, use the max power of progressions to see U over the 'Missing' hurdles.

The one problem I can foresee with ANY of the Matrix patterns is U are stuck with Ur bet selection, right there at the point of the Opportunity.
U can not choose the bet, it being chosen for U, by the rigidity of the Matrix grid formulation.

I will, just for the exercise, perform Open Heart Surgery at one of the Live wheels I know of, and see what happens.
May also put Amriks Silver-Side of Beef System on trial as well! 

[Chrisbis]

Here is a Classic example.

This screen shot is taken from the latest version of Ophis's excellent MST 1.5.3 tacker/clicker.

In the shot, there are two matrix bets, they both are active, and want U the player to bet on them.
The problem..... both bets are not the same, so that moment in time, when the matrix has chosen the OPPORTUNITY.... and the output from the Matrix Grid, is completely different!

How can it be?

Either one is right, or, as more likely, Neither are right!!

[attach=1]

[woods101]

1B3A3A1C2A2C1C3B2C1A2A2A0A2C0B3C1A3C3A3B3C2C1A2C3...
                                                                            BET
                                                                            AGAINST
                                                                            C1A 1-3-9

1B3A3A1C2A2C1C3B2C1A2A2A0A2C0B3C1A3C3A3B3C2C1A2C3C2B2C1A1
                                                                                   BET
                                                                                   AGAINST
                                                                                   B3C 1-3-9
                                                                           

translated..

1B3A3A1C2A2C1C3B2C1A2A2A0A2C0B3C1A3C3A3B3C2C1A2C3...
                                                                             BET
                                                                             AGAINST
                                                                             C1A 1-3-9

1B3A3A1C2A2C1C3B2C1A2A2A0A2C0B3C1A3C3A3B3C2C1A2C3C2B2C1A1....
                                                                                     BET
                                                                                     AGAINST
                                                                                     B3C 1-3-9

1B3A3A1C2A2C1C3B2C1A2A2A0A2C0B3C1A3C3A3B3C2C1A2C3C2B2C1A1....
                                                                         BET
                                                                         AGAINST
                                                                         3A3 1-3-9




There's others buried in there also if you look closer...

or..

rbbbbrbbbrrrbrrrbbrbbrbrbrbr...
                                   bet here against rb

translated:

RBbbbRBbbrrRBrrrbbRBbrbrbrBR..
                                       bet here(BR) against RB

The longer and more complex the sequence the harder for random to stick to it maybe?

Try it you might like it !   

[woods101]

Soz don't know tracker or method but I guess you will have conflict if you play two opposing methods at the same time. would you have won if one of them was right? If so then it can't be the case that they're both wrong surely? Can't pass much more comment than that I'm afraid. Try the original method mentioned above mate. 27u. See how far you get.

[ANONYMOUS]

I really like the way this looks, im surprised more people havent taken a second look at this method. Especially when you wait for a repeating pattern as you suggested. I am going to be testing this in live casinos this week and will report back with results. I will be playing sessions of 4 games  as johnlegend has suggested. with a 1-3-9 progression.

[ANONYMOUS]

I really like the way this looks, I'm surprised more people haven't taken a second look at this method. Especially when you wait for a repeating pattern as you suggested. I am going to be testing this in live casinos this week and will report back with results. I will be playing sessions of 4 games  as johnlegend has suggested. with a 1-3-9 progression. i will be playing this with dc rules but also watching for those repeating patterns to emerge and bet against those when they present themselves, so far it looks very, very good.

[GLC]

Anonymous,


How did things go?

[woods101]

Hi Anonymous, GLC,

I think this may be stronger than straight DC but you're right - still play it the same way as JL etc. I haven't had the time to test this but it seems to stand up as well as original DC if not stronger.
I'm thinking of a variation which is to wait for the first two draws ie 3,a or 2,b etc you have various columns which start 1,a 1,b 1,c; 2,a 2,b 2c; etc.
You match the first two draws with whichever column and then play against the next three draws so you might have:

1 a 2 a 3 as ex and the next two draws are 1 a,
then place this in the 1,a column underneath so...

1 a 2 a 3
1 a

so here you are then playing against the next three draws being 2 a 3.

You are playing against 5 consecutive draws being the same as a previous 5 draws but you are still only risking 27 units.

Are the risks any less? I don't know. Not a maths guy but it seems less likely to me as a layman.

Woods

[woods101]

A word of warning tho - I haven't tested this very much at all (the original idea) much less the new variation so tread carefully and cautiously at the moment. Little stakes or just test it first and see how you go.

Woods

[amk]

 Hey woods,

Its been a while. Maybe we can get back in the spin of things.

How do you like this one:

1b2c2b1c1b3c3b1b2c1b2b2c1b2c

1b is spun in our first two spins

We then randomly chose when we enter the game and bet against 1b forming but this has to be following the same spin sequence, each two spins belongs together like 1b

1b2c2b1c1b3c3b1b2c1b2b2c1b2c         here we lost because 1b appeared again

Now we wait for three patterns to form, or 6 spins and then bet against 1b forming again

1b2c2b1c1b3c3b1b2c1b2b2c1b2c         2c formed and we win


I like this because we are not following a fixed pattern. We step to the table and say I am going to play after 3 patterns have formed or 6 etc.. Each time will be different but perhaps we will stay in a range of 5 patterns or 10 spins or the sessions will get to long.

Good luck ANONYMOUS, whoever you are

[woods101]

HI AMK,

How's it going? is this working for you? What staking are you using?

woods

[ANONYMOUS]

hey guys, a lot of testing still needs to be done, but i am curious how many times in for example divide and conquer you see a triple in one column  for example

122
122
122   maybe we can just bet against a triple  for only 8 units risk  and if hit  we bet against a quad using 4-12 hoping fora W so we only lose 4 units every triple i would think we shud win most of the time? or maybe i am disillusioned so i wonder what about betting against a triple like

2a3b
2a3b
2a3b <-- i have yet to see this once. ( in dc code 4 style) only risk is 26 units...

[GLC]

hey guys, a lot of testing still needs to be done, but i am curious how many times in for example divide and conquer you see a triple in one column  for example

122
122
122   maybe we can just bet against a triple  for only 8 units risk  and if hit  we bet against a quad using 4-12 hoping fora W so we only lose 4 units every triple i would think we should win most of the time? or maybe i am disillusioned so i wonder what about betting against a triple like

2a3b
2a3b
2a3b <-- i have yet to see this once. ( in dc code 4 style) only risk is 26 units...

I have an acquaintence who plays nothing but bets like this.  He has a whole slew of them that he watches for when he goes to Las Vegas.  He watches the roulette tables for things like 9 colors or even chances in a row then bets for the break.  He checks every location for the development of a rare event. 


If you only bet your idea, it could be a long wait between bets, but if it was just one of the events you were watching for, I think it would work.


He does use a mild progression.  If he's ahead when he leaves the casino he resets all progressions to 1.  If he's behind, he has a way of balancing out the bet locations that he's behind on with the other locations so that all of his bets are just a little larger the next visit.  This keeps the bet size of a location that's doing poorly from escalating out of control.


He swears that he wins 9 out of 10 trips to the casino.


Since he thinks he has the Holy Grail for beating roulette, he won't tell me any more.  He has to go to Las Vegas to play
GLC