Double Shot on Double Dozens

[Maui13]

@ GLC - what you said makes perfect sense! Going to try do it exactly as per you last post.
Thank you for the reply!


Cheers
M


PS. Is anyone else perhaps playing this on CODE 4

[Turner]

GLC,

Seems nice all round and I do like double doz, double column style bets, but you are right, there will be a streak.

I did analyse, on excel, the old system that if one doz hasn't showed for 5 then bet on it, and a few times one doz didn't show for 17 spins, including the 5 to qualify, so for a further 12 spins. I wouldnt like to have been on the other 2 dozens.

I play the 2 next dozens right if loss, so, no.12 is top of the marquee, play 2/3, no.1, play 3/1, no.13, play 1/2, no.13, play 1/2, no.5, play 1/2, zero, play 2/3 etc.

I am fooling myself that I am mixing it up, but it looks impressive in the casino.

Turner

[Turner]

GLC,
Sorry, Ispotted something, wonder if you could clear it up.

If we are betting the last 2 added up, say 21-21 becomes 16+12=28, shouldnt it be:

1-1, 2-2, 3-3, 5-5, 8-8, 13-13, 21-21, 34-34 etc

[Jeromin]

GLC,
Sorry, Ispotted something, wonder if you could clear it up.

If we are betting the last 2 added up, say 21-21 becomes 16+12=28, shouldnt it be:

1-1, 2-2, 3-3, 5-5, 8-8, 13-13, 21-21, 34-34 etc

we skip the last one. so you add first before last to second before last ( obviously with the first two steps you cannot have a second before last):
1 2 3 4 5 7 9 12 16 21
2+3= 5 ;skip 4
3+4=7 ;skip 5
4+5=9 ; skip 7

etc.

Jeromin

[Turner]

Thanks Jeromin

I as doing last  not one before last.

Understood!

[GLC]

Thanks for helping out Jeromin.

You're right, I skipped the last because I felt like it caused us to increase our bet size too rapidly.  It would be the fibonacci method.

There are some pros to using the last 2 numbers.  The main one is that you recover with fewer wins after a series of losses.

The real negative is the one I mentioned 1st, your bets get pretty large after a few losses in a row.

I've thought about using the 3rd and 4th before last to slow it down even more.  It's all relative with pros and cons for any way you decide to do it.

Like I said, none of this is cast in stone.  We are the captains of our own ships.  Sail 'em where you want.

Is there an ideal way to play that gives us the best overall chance to win?   

[Vengetind]

Hi everyone! I'm sorry to bump this thread but I really liked the idea behind this strategy and wanted to ask GLC something:

Should you always raise your bet after you win one spin? I have a feeling that aiming for wins in a row at the same betting amount is a pretty smart strategy.

For example: 2-2-lose, 3-3 lose, 4-4 win, 44-win. If I win the first "shot" i don't add chips, but if I lose the first one, then I add. What do you reckon? Hope that wasn't all to confusing. 

[GLC]

Hi everyone! I'm sorry to bump this thread but I really liked the idea behind this strategy and wanted to ask GLC something:

Should you always raise your bet after you win one spin? I have a feeling that aiming for wins in a row at the same betting amount is a pretty smart strategy.

For example: 2-2-lose, 3-3 lose, 4-4 win, 44-win. If I win the first "shot" i don't add chips, but if I lose the first one, then I add. What do you reckon? Hope that wasn't all to confusing. 

Like I said, this can be tweaked to suit your playing style. 
What you are proposing makes perfect sense to me.  I just want to point out that your progression will either need to escalate more quickly or you should be ready to spend longer to dig out of a hole.

It's the ole risk vs reward decision.  You're suggestion involves a little less risk, but it comes with a little less reward given the same spins.

I'm not trying to discourage you in any way.

Like I said, I like it!

GLC