Roulette is a game of mathematical perfection

[slatan]

It was very interesting to read. Please share your opinions

[weddings]

i dun get how he gets the clockwise positions.

[slatan]

i dun get how he gets the clockwise positions.

I spent an hour and still can't get it

[Chrisbis]

There are no numbers in the grid table, do U have them?

And who is the author? U should say who's writing this is attributed to.

[Drazen]

I have seen this long time ago. Numbers are "invisible" in the table. Spell tip how to reveal them:
Change the color of numbers in the table in black color, and they will show yourself to you.

Then all will have sense. Very good idea for further developing.

Regards

Drazen

[vladir]

I think I grasp the concept. It appears to have some good stuff here. But this is not easy to track... Even harder to test for a good ammount of spins...

[slatan]

There are no numbers in the grid table, do You have them?

And who is the author? U should say who's writing this is attributed to.

Chrisbis, I downloaded it as is from turbogenius.webs.com. No further instructions were given

[Master_of_pockets]

   I read this topic and I would like to give my point of view.
Turbo is a person that I like.He is trying to beat the wheel with maths and reasons.I have read all his published systems.
   I went in his site and I did not find this "download". So slatan can you show me where you found it? thanks.
 
My point of view about this idea of Turbogenius:

   Combining 2 or 3 or more things it is a nice thing to do. But  with the way that he describes it is not a valid combination.
   The numbers that did not appear in the last 37 spins ,have nothing to do with the distance of pockets between 2 numbers in the CW or ACW direction.
   He says that if the number 5(for example) has not hit in the last 37 spins , but the CW distance of 5 pockets has happened in the last 37 spins , then we must not bet the number 5 !
  WHY? what has to do the number 5 with the CW distance of 5 pockets between 2 spins. NOTHING.
So his combination with the way that is doing it , it is not correct.It is not a combination.

Although his way of calculation is mistaken he gave me a nice and new way way to look at roulette.
But I do not know if we can find a correct way to combine 2-3 events.

One idea is to play the numbers that did not hit in the last 37 spins and in the same time play all the distances of the CW or ACW direction that did not hit in the last 37 spins. But this will require to start playing with 24(or something) numbers.

ps. He also made an other silly mistake.
He did not had to count the CW AND the ACW.
Because if for example the CW is 10(pockets distance) then the ACW will ALWAYS be 27. So it is pointless.

I was really expecting something more clever from Turbo. I think he is starting losing his minds.

[Nathanael]

Even if he made some mistakes, and we would need him to explain why he connects the number 5 and the 5th location on the wheel to know we're right in assuming he made a mistake, this is still a valuable presentation for purposes of stimulating ideas, if nothing else.

Nate

[StackBundles]

why dont u just check kimo li instead

[Optimist]

I like the idea of combining number sets.

I think that Turbo made mistake too.

I see combination like this.  Lets take 37 spins and CW movements. You get cold numbers (around 12) and around 12 "COLD" movements. But you combine not the cold numbers and distances from the pockets but cold numbers and numbers you get from the last spun number calculating distances on the wheel.
After next spin you have recombine because you get new last spun number and "COLD" CW movements will produce different numbers for combination.
I understand that it is impossible to track by hand but with tracker could be nice system.

regards

DL

[ego]

Well i am not the expert - but once among other times i send Laurance one email about similiar topic.
It would be the holy grail if you could capture the postive fluctation if there is no true bias.
They start to apper and vanish like any other selection and there is no positive expectation.

I apolieges being negative.

[Kimo Li]

 

why don't u just check kimo li instead

Roulette only appears to be a game of mathematical perfection, only if you think in linear terms.  However, if you think in cyclical terms, and open your mind to someone who has lost their mind, you might learn something.
Imagine these 36 numbers were in a circle. Now count the spaces between the numbers as it relates in a circle of continuous spaces based on 6 number increments.
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
One space relationship: 12, 23, 34, 45, 56, 61, 12, 23, etc.
Two space: 13, 24, 35, 46, 51, 62, 13, 24 etc.
Three space: 14, 25, 36, 41, 52, 63, 14, 25 etc.
Four space: 15, 26, 31, 42, 53, 64, 15, 26, etc.
Five space: 16, 21, 32, 43, 54, 65, 16, 21, etc.
Six space: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66

Now try it ACW:
One space relationship: 16, 65, 54, 43, 32, 21, 16 etc.
Two space: etc. 15, 64, 53, 42, 31, 15 etc.
Three space: 14, 63, 52, 41, 36, 25, 14, etc
Four space: 13, 62, 51, 46, 35, 24, 13, etc.
Five space: 12, 61, 56, 45, 34, 23, 12, etc.
Six space: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66
The spaces between numbers in a cyclical table base have different meanings from a traditional numerical point of view. For example, space 53 CW has a four space difference, while 53 ACW has a two space difference.
And yes, you can track this “stuff”.
Welcome to the Global Star System.
Kimo Li

[Master_of_pockets]

   I also said that this "wheel combination concept" of Turbo is a very nice idea that can be the "trigger"  for new systems.
   I think that we need an excel tracker that can help us in this concept.
What we need is to have an excel tracker that we will be inserting 2 roulette numbers and it will be calculating the distance between those numbers.
  We do not need to have both calculations of CW and ACW direction. Because as I posted above if the CW is X then the ACW will always be Y. We just need the one direction.
   I have a nice idea on this concept and I please an excel programmer to make this excel tracker.

Thank you very much.

[Kattila]

Pocket distances ( European R. W.)