Ball 24 plus with progression

[maestro]

  i just love that forum because of posts like this..hats off superman

[superman]

LOL glad it brightend your day mate

[MadMax]

@Justdreams (much better name now )
I don´t really understand what the google translator gives me with this text. But if you want to ask, if a number should be betted after it came up more than 2 times, the answer is yes. According to the rules of Turnerfeck, all numbers which appeared at least 2 times are betted, no matter how often it comes up.

[Justdreams]

Thanks for the reply MadMax.
Still not working though the tracker.

[jarabo002]

Thank you MadMax for the tracker!

Justdreams, propondré a Victor un subforo en español, como se dice en mi tierra: a si acasooo...

[Justdreams]

Thank you.

[Cristal2000]

As a few members have asked for import function and other progressions, I have recoded the tracker.
Gordonline helped me test the new tracker, and we both found no bug. Thanks Gordon for your work! It really helped me a lot!
If you find a bug, please let me know!
So, the tracker has 4 kinds of progression now, which you can choose at the beginning of the program:
-Turnerfeck´s original progression
-a kind of Martingale (similar to superman´s suggestion from his post above)
-a kind of d´Alembert (up 1 unit every 35 spins, on a win 35 steps back the progression)
-Flat bet
Under actions, you can now import and calculate your spins. With this spins, you can´t go on in the tracker. All spins entered before importing will be ignored. Also, after you have made an import, all previous inputs are gone. They are still shown in the marquee, but the program don´t use them any more! If you import a very large number of spins, it could take some time until you will be shown the result, because all calculationes are made before showing them.
I hope, these new tracker will help you.
MadMax

PS And thanks for all kind words about the tracker!

You are a BIG........
Many Thanks 

[soggett]

Thanks for the reply MadMax.
Still not working though the tracker.

You think something is wrong with the tracker?

[Justdreams]

I think so. You can try it with the numbers I put in my post.

[MadMax]

@Justdreams:
I checked your numbers (not easy to understand) and couldn´t find an error in the tracker. You mean, number 14 should stay in the betting area (and later number 30), but in your permanence, number 14 isn´t longer qualified for betting when number 6 becomes qualified (the same with 30), because it drops out of the 24 number range.
Or do you mean something else? If it is so, could you give me another row of numbers where you explain, what is going wrong?
Thanks
MadMax

[Justdreams]

MadMax I was wrong. I had not realized that the number 14 was no longer among the last 24 numbers.
regards

[soggett]

Oh, ok then
How are everybodys results with this?
Any bad/good sessions?

[krukov]

Hi guys

I was trying another system this summer and i keep all the numbers from the sessions

I tried them today all 25 session with min of 80 numbers and max of 300 per session ( avg about 150 )

I tried them WITH stop-win/loss on 1000 units, and WITHOUT stop-win/loss on 1000 units

Results :
With stop-win/loss TOTAL : +5816 units
WITHOUT stop-win/loss TOTAL : +8097 units

keep in mind - the "without" sessions ends while there is not STOP RULE applied !!! Because i've played different system and i kept the other system stop rule , sometimes i have 6-7 numbers i have to play with 10-15 units per number and ... i have no numbers in the session. So my point is it is not good to make conclusions considering there is instant "strange" stop on the session ( no logical )

I hope you understand what i mean ( i'm not english ... )

I think that this system has potential and need a little bit of tuning.
I will try now the other types of betting that the program offers me.

A BIG THANKS TO MAD MAX

[krukov]

unfortunately i have a 1000 number session and i just found it and tested it WITHOUT any stop-win/loss.

Result is : -5046

Reslt WITH stop-win/loss on -/+ 1000:

-1040
-1104
-1086
1070
-1074
-1053
-1037
-1050
-1063
-1124
335

total : -8226

as far as i can tell now ( what gaps do i see in the system )

The idea is every hit to make us break even or better , isn't it ? - if so , this is not possible if you have to bet 5-6 numbers with 20+ chips

in this 1000 spins i saw something strange , very often there were no repetitions for avg 15-20 spins - which is very strange

it has to have some stop-loss on gambler's feeling ( when you feel like it/on personal decision i mean ) like if you go up and down up and down up and barely break even - i call it "the roulette is playing with you" , i suggest stop now - break even or a little bit behind/loss and wait 10 mins go smoke a cigarette or something then go back to play.

maybe some restrictions how many numbers we play - i noticed something like i have to play 9-10 numbers and they do not appear "in time" to make me profit. they appear after the disappear from the "24 list".At 1st i thought - bad luck - but hey it is 1000 spins ... long run ... this had to be the ultimate test. And on top of that we can't talk about "the influence of the observer" ( behodler - not sure how to say it in English ) - you know i mean quantum physics - because the numbers are already hit and i am just testing on them.

some changes on stop win - maybe we should stop on +500 units or +200 units i don`t know
like the 20% profit rule. We play with 1000 and when we make 200 stop. ( just suggesting )


phew sorry for the big post. Does anyone else have any results and want to share them ?

[Bassie the Clown]

Mixed results. Some great winnings (hundreds of units), but I lost it all. I always liked 'the law of the third 'approach, but it is oh so difficult to make constant winning bets.
For every number that hits twice or more, there is a sleeper.