Your roulette system search is over...

[Steve]

That reminds me, are you still ok with 35% commission on sales, and $500 per HG you censor?

[Steve]

Btw its not flashes of ads. It's the new image background. Its cool.

[denzie]

I tried this system a while back.  It's not consistent lost money.  :q  :q

Hey Proof,

How did you play?

[Turner]

That reminds me, are you still ok with 35% commission on sales, and $500 per HG you censor?

perfect....

[denzie]

  can I be a Mod too ? I'm happy with 25%

[falkor2k15]

Whats the one thing you need to KNOW
THE DISTRIBUTION OF NON-HITS
Study that and you'll have a chance

I think notto might be onto something here... I am noticing some patterns here that there might be something significant about the non-hits in both cycles and VdW. Perhaps we need to erase any repeats from our data and concentrate on the non-repeating data.

[RouletteGhost]

He has not only proven he is onto something

He has proven it WORKS regardless of what people think

KTF wins overcome the losing sessions by a long shot

It is not RRRR now bet B.........

[Steve]

Falkor, be specific. What patterns?

With my software I've tested many billions of rng spins, and millions of real spins, and never found any patterns related to sleepers or repeaters except in cases attributed to wheel bias. But bias doesn't cause repeats like your probably referring to. It just changes odds slightly.

Rg what do you consider proof?

[falkor2k15]

Falkor, be specific. What patterns?

With my software I've tested many billions of rng spins, and millions of real spins, and never found any patterns related to sleepers or repeaters except in cases attributed to wheel bias. But bias doesn't cause repeats like your probably referring to. It just changes odds slightly.

Rg what do you consider proof?

I've only started to join these dots very recently. Building layers of repeats can tell us about potential future events and build a nice game - but all this information that is used to construct the multi-layered repeats game is contained entirely in the non-hits stream akin to a DNA sequence. I'm starting to see this pattern in many contexts now. It's like the Fibonacci sequence in nature - everything is pointing to the non-hits. But this is still a very fresh realization, so I have a lot more testing to do to see if my hypothesis is correct.

[denzie]

KTF wins overcome the losing sessions by a long shot

It does ?

[Steve]

Falkor, if you or anyone specify a clear algoritm or theory that appears to be new, i can have it coded for proper testing. It's not realistic to manually test most approaches because the results are still within normal random expectation

[falkor2k15]

Steve, hopefully I can come up with something soon and will post it in the Random Throughts thread. I wouldn't want to waste your time unless I had something concrete. I already glimpsed the power of non-hits via VdW, and I liked what I saw; now I might be seeing the same with cycles. This weekend will be the cycles tests and the last week of July will be VdW. Will keep you posted innit! 

[RouletteGhost]

Falkor, be specific. What patterns?

With my software I've tested many billions of rng spins, and millions of real spins, and never found any patterns related to sleepers or repeaters except in cases attributed to wheel bias. But bias doesn't cause repeats like your probably referring to. It just changes odds slightly.

Rg what do you consider proof?

I dont need harcore solid math proof

Because i know the math and odds never change

Im talking about the hundreds of sessions notto posted on this forum

Thats all i need to consider it a decent method

The losses always recoup and fast.

Dont agree?  Thats fine

[Steve]

rg I can easily profit in thousands of spins with rng making random bets, at least some of the time. The results are meaningless. We go in circles with this stuff.

You say you get it all, but then make incorrect statements, but also that you dont care because youre a hobby player. Dont get me wrong, I dont care what you do with your money. I just dont want people to be misled and harmed by dangerously inaccurate advice. But If the losses recoup as you say, go make your fortune.

[RouletteGhost]

rg I can easily profit in thousands of spins with rng making random bets, at least some of the time. The results are meaningless. We go in circles with this stuff.

You say you get it all, but then make incorrect statements, but also that you dont care because youre a hobby player. Dont get me wrong, I dont care what you do with your money. I just dont want people to be misled and harmed by dangerously inaccurate advice. But If the losses recoup as you say, go make your fortune.

Ok