6X6 DOUBLE STREET SYSTEM

[Kattila]

Quote from Hermes (from the other forum, VLS):

*It is possible that some lines are mixed together*   ?

[Cristal2000]

hello. . . . . .

why do you always start playing from 1Ã,° double street ?
example
1
12
123
1234
12345

can this change . . . .

look last number
for example the last number is 24, this is in 4Ã,° double Street
we can start playing from the 4Ã,° double Street . . .
4
45
456
4561
45612

Another example:
the last number is 12, this is in 2Ã,° double Street
we can start playing from 2Ã,° double street . . .

2
23
234
2345
23456

etc.

you can try ?

         

[weddings]

why not? you must be flexible. many ways to start which streets you want but the main thing we are looking at is which works the best.

[Smee]

Right. . . . . first post but am so interested in this idea i felt i had to write something!

When I started reading this in the other forum I thought the idea to wait for 3 losses in seperate DS's, then bet on the LAST DS, was because the system works on the odds of all 6 DS's NOT coming up in a sequence of 6 spins or bets (not nessessarily in order tho) was very low.

i. e - the chances of all 6 DS's coming up in 6 spins was very low therefore we bet on the last DS, then the next last DS and so on.

If we simply bet DS 1, then DS 1 and 2, then DS1,2 and 3 etc we could miss out on the repeating DS's.  Ball might land on DS6 - we bet DS 1.  Then ball lands on DS6 again so we bet DS 1 and 2. . . . and potentially lose a chance to win.  This part dosnt make any sense to me, maybe Im missing something.

Anyway, I tried the original idea out very quickly on a RNG.  Only 200 spins but using $1, $1, $2, $6 and $36 as in the original progression I was up $68 and it didnt fail.

Then I started betting DS1, DS1 and 2, DS1,2 and 3. . . . . . . as has been suggested another 200 spins and it also didnt lose.  So I dunno except that my sample size is waaaaaay too small.

Im also unsure of what to do after 5 losses. . . . . . cant bet on all DS's so i spose thats the end of that progression and its gotta start over again from 3 virtual losses. . . . .

I went back thru the thread and read this from Hermes - "I told him if 5th double street comes bet 6,1,2,3,4, next came 3rd DS than bet 4,5,6,1,2 and so on. . .  He is a smart ass" and it dosnt make sense to me. does this mean we bet on the OTHER 5 DS's EXCEPT THE LAST ONE THAT CAME UP? It seems to contradict the original post and idea or is this the secret 5%?

But I do know Im pretty excited about this and will keep my eye on both threads and also do a lot more testing.

And thanks Hermes for allowing Warrior to post this (and to Warrior for posting it), its pretty cool!

[Hermes]

Warrior is now soaking sore feet from standing in casinos with 18 years old women on Hawaii. It is pleasant but more expensive than gambling.

There are many ways to the heaven and hell. All approaches are valid but some will be more fortunate than others. We have to test which one.

We have yet next to immortal 3 approaches:
A/ 1-12-123-1234-12345. B/ came 6 bet 12345 C/ Follow the table e.g.
came bet
3
2 bet 3
5 bet 3,2
6 bet 3,2,5
6 bet 3,2,5,6 win
2 bet 6 and so on...but follow the table will lose always if no DS repeats!

There are not too many repeats on double streets therefore I like the A approach most.
There is an old system for retired people (approach B) to bet all the DS but not the last one with 3 steps progression but for short period only. After you make $10-$20 go home. Works well to enhance pension.

Secretary of His Majesty Warrior during his holiday
Hermes

[moles40]

Thanks for all your explainations guys

Hopefully we can all here beat this most frustrating of gambling games

[Fripper]

came bet
3
2 bet 3
5 bet 3,2
6 bet 3,2,5
6 bet 3,2,5,6 win
2 bet 6 and so on...but follow the table will lose always if no DS repeats!

I tested this for 312 spins and I stopped at +109 units.
I played with this progression:
1
11
111
3333

Total of 18 units.
I lost it 3 times. But still up 109 units.
Thanks for this Hermes and as you said, we need a repeater in 5 spins. After my research, I found that it does come an repeat very often.
With this progression I played, results:
+5 unit
+3 unit
0 unit
0 unit

So you win if you get a repeater in the first 2 spins.

[Kingspin]

That looks an interesting progression , i had been looking for a different progression for this great system , hermes progression for  me is just a bit too aggressive.   :)

[Fripper]

That looks an interesting progression , I had been looking for a different progression for this great system , hermes progression for  me is just a bit too aggressive.   

Yes I don't like the aggressive ones either so I come up with this. Maybe we can find a better one

[Kingspin]

I tried it for real money with your "fripper progression" , the system i found becomes a severe grind,you could be sat hours upon hours in b&M.  The best way i can see to play this is with bigger value  chips say 50 unit chips then quit after 1 to 3 wins.  On low value chips like Ã,£1 chips it's not a system i would play.   

[Hermes]

My progression, especially the the heavy one was a little bit too much even for me. What about Attila progression? Play last 4 (or 5?) DS all the time: 1111-2222-3333-4444 and so on.
Could be played as a hunter system where you wait until you see 4-5 spins single DS coming, no repeat, like 1-3-5-6-2. After that suppression should come repeats like 3-6-3-1-5-5 and so on.
Hermes

[Smee]

Whats the longest run of repeat DS's youve seen Hermes? Or anyone?

[Hermes]

7 repeats in row in 4,356 spins.
Hermes

[BBJ]

I tried this one several times, I didn't had much luck with it, had several times 123456 ranges.

[Fripper]

I tried this one several times, I didn't had much luck with it, had several times 123456 ranges.

Well, I have tested this alot and haven't seen 123456 yet so, it is very different from person to person.