CODE 6

[THECATT]

Hi to everyone, this is my first topic... just a quick thanks for all the ideas thats been created and discussed, its been a pleasure to read.  Whats your thoughts on changing CODE 4 IN TO CODE 6 for a 1 unit stake, i think you would be really unlucky to be taken up to CODE 6 playing hit and run with the odds in your favor being 720/1, i have implemented a cover for ZERO at code 6 too... Thoughts please??

[amk]

Lets go...........

What is your progression for covering the zero?

[GLC]

Hi to everyone, this is my first topic... just a quick thanks for all the ideas that's been created and discussed, its been a pleasure to read.  what's your thoughts on changing CODE 4 IN TO CODE 6 for a 1 unit stake, i think you would be really unlucky to be taken up to CODE 6 playing hit and run with the odds in your favor being 720/1, i have implemented a cover for ZERO at code 6 too... Thoughts please??

I'm no math whiz but if the odds are 720 to 1 and you're playing to win 1 unit each attack, doesn't that mean you have to win 721 times to stay ahead of 1 loss.  Dang, a lot of different spins can come up in 720 attacks.  Do you think you've got that covered.

I'm with AMK,  let's have  a looksee.

GLC

[Anthony]

Maybe you can play code 6 code 4 style and wait for the first 2 numbers to match and then use a 4 step progression.

Example

1a3b2c
2c1a3b
3a1a2a
1A<<<<<<< this is where you would start your 4 step progression because the first 2 numbers match the first 2 numbers of the first row. This may take a bit of tracking to match the first 2 numbers but I believe it's worth the testing because this trigger might give very very long winning streaks.

Just an idea!

Anthony

[Robeenhuut]

Maybe you can play code 6 code 4 style and wait for the first 2 numbers to match and then use a 4 step progression.

Example

1a3b2c
2c1a3b
3a1a2a
1A<<<<<<< this is where you would start your 4 step progression because the first 2 numbers match the first 2 numbers of the first row. This may take a bit of tracking to match the first 2 numbers but I believe it's worth the testing because this trigger might give very very long winning streaks.

Just an idea!

Anthony

Sorry  its too much risk for too little gain. i suggest 1,2,4,6 for regular code 4.
You risk 26u in total only but you only win on a first step. If you get hit on 2 step you break even, 3 step you lose 2 and if you win on a final step you lose 8. I play reverse dozens like this.  Dont risk 81u to win 1u.
Just an idea.

Regards


Regards

[THECATT]

Progression to cover ZERO would be 21 units on ZERO only if you are taken to code 6, if zero hits you lose 20 units instead of your 728 units and thats if you ever get to code 6...

[THECATT]

Yes that is correct that you are risking 720/1u but hit and run surely you would have to be unlucky to throw your dart in where the code 6 comes out,

Playing code 6 you dont have to wait for a full 6 code to come out, you simply write down the first 2 results on the previous code as this was the sequence it came out as.. ex:

1A1B2B
2B2A3C
3C2B2C
2C3B
..........        this is where you start betting but you still only have to spin 4 spins for 1 game..

[THECATT]

1A1B2B
2B2A3C
3C2B2C
...........   sorry this is where you start

[GLC]

Sorry  its too much risk for too little gain. i suggest 1,2,4,6 for regular code 4.
You risk 26u in total only but you only win on a first step. If you get hit on 2 step you break even, 3 step you lose 2 and if you win on a final step you lose 8. I play reverse dozens like this.  don't risk 81u to win 1u.
Just an idea.

Regards


Regards

Good point RBH.

Here's an obvious compromise:

1-1 = +1
3-3 = +1
7-7 = -1
14-14 = -8

Total risk = 50 units

It may be worth the extra risk because of the high hit rate in the 1st 2 bets?

GLC

[Robeenhuut]

Good point RBH.

Here's an obvious compromise:

1-1 = +1
3-3 = +1
7-7 = -1
14-14 = -8

Total risk = 50 units

It may be worth the extra risk because of the high hit rate in the 1st 2 bets?

GLC

Hello GLC

This thing hits frequently in 2 first steps so we can play as you suggested as well.

Regards

[THECATT]

Thats seems a good way for 50 units, what about progression for code 6 ??