who's making money out of roulette at the moment?

[MauiSunset]

It's already pretty much done. Others have it. Once they gain the needed experience
perhaps one of them will feel sorry for you, hold your hand,  and bottle feed you.

I may have been wrong about you. You might not be ignorant. What makes you
think that I want to drag a person like you to prosperity? You deserve the worst
possible treatment from just about everyone on this forum. Go ahead. Start a new
chapter for the math Nazis. Complain all you want. Jeez - the people they'll give a
degree to these days.

Somehow I think I'm the least of your problems.....

[albertojonas]

Good grief I pity your "students".


The chance of Red or Black is 18/(38 lets just go with American wheels)=47.37% or the odds are 1 in 2.11 spins.  That's just 5th grade math.


If you want to do better than that you must increase the odds - from 1 in 2.11 spins to 1 in 2 or 1 in 1.9 or 1.8 or whatever to do better.  You will have to eliminate some of the 38 possible outcomes to increase the odds.  How does one do this?  I haven't a clue.  Every one of those 38 slots has the same probability of being hit spin after spin after spin.


That's the problem with fixed odds - they can't change under any circumstances - at least in Roulette. 

there are easy ways to increase the odds.
i will charge you 100â,¬ to show you how you increase from 1 in 2.11 to 1 in 2. And no tricks attached, no no zero roulette. i mean on a B&M casino, live wheal with dealer and all...


if you want, i am at your disposal.


PS-Everyone committed to roulette knows this.

[MauiSunset]

there are easy ways to increase the odds.
i will charge you 100â,¬ to show you how you increase from 1 in 2.11 to 1 in 2. And no tricks attached, no no zero roulette. i mean on a B&M casino, live wheal with dealer and all...


if you want, i am at your disposal.


PS-Everyone committed to roulette knows this.

Well sure, put a single chip on 0 and 00 I'm guessing.


But you've now got multiple odds that actually decrease your total overall odds.


It's the same as the clowns who wait for the ball to be spun before they pile on dozens of numbers, columns, dozens and rows - give them 30 minutes and they are totally wiped out.


Piling on multiple bets is no solution or it would bankrupt the casino.


I routinely take my winnings, if I have any at the moment, and use different systems with much higher odds of losing but have a higher payout.  But I only do this with casino money.  I could never bet on Red and 0 at the same time with my money - that's a loser of a bet.....

[Gizmotron]

So let me state this - if your system/technique is larger than one typed page of 8pt type I have no desire to read it nor understand it since it's way way too complicated to ever work...

Deliberately target the most opportunistic trend with a Boolean Principle as the result. Act on the result.

[MauiSunset]

Deliberately target the most opportunistic trend with a Boolean Principle as the result. Act on the result.

There is no such thing as an "opportunistic trend" in Roulette and using Boolean Algebra on this nonsense is as likely to help you as using a Fourier Transform to convert the spun numbers into a hologram.


Maybe using math Gobbledygook fools some of your students, it doesn't fool me; it's still Gobbledygook.  You make up definitions of things that don't exist and build system from them - they won't work no matter how much Gobbledygook you use.


Total rubbish..........

[warrior]

So you bet red or black and hope you win ,correct Charlie

[Skakus]

 

link:://:.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaXAymwbuUM#

[Gizmotron]

It is obvious you don't debate very well. You are ignorant of the existence of an most opportunistic trend. As far as a Boolean Principle the most basic form applies here. "And," "Or," or "And/Or" are all in that category . Guess what form applies. Don't bother. You are too set in your ways. All the proof I need will be in the other people that are not too ignorant to find out what works. At this point you have pretty much all the attention needed to see your value on this forum.

There is no such thing as an "opportunistic trend" in Roulette and using Boolean Algebra on this nonsense is as likely to help you as using a Fourier Transform to convert the spun numbers into a hologram.


Maybe using math Gobbledygook fools some of your students, it doesn't fool me; it's still Gobbledygook.  You make up definitions of things that don't exist and build system from them - they won't work no matter how much Gobbledygook you use.


Total nonsense..........

[Skakus]

 

Fail - Capoeira Hip Hop Street Fighter Brazil

[MauiSunset]

It is obvious you don't debate very well. You are ignorant of the existence of an most opportunistic trend. As far as a Boolean Principle the most basic form applies here. "And," "Or," or "And/Or" are all in that category . Guess what form applies. Don't bother. You are too set in your ways. All the proof I need will be in the other people that are not too ignorant to find out what works. At this point you have pretty much all the attention needed to see your value on this forum.

Gizmo, I guess you can't state your theory on one sheet of paper and I don't have any idea how much time you expect me to make heads or tails out of your work.


Nothing has changed in one year - wacky ideas with no tie back to reality.


Maybe someone else here has a dying urge to understanding your Roulette Manifesto but count me out of the madness.


Best of luck with your theories......

[Steve]

Skakus, those are two of the funniest videos ever. What a wonderful world..

[albertojonas]

Well sure, put a single chip on 0 and 00 I'm guessing.


But you've now got multiple odds that actually decrease your total overall odds.


It's the same as the clowns who wait for the ball to be spun before they pile on dozens of numbers, columns, dozens and rows - give them 30 minutes and they are totally wiped out.


Piling on multiple bets is no solution or it would bankrupt the casino.


I routinely take my winnings, if I have any at the moment, and use different systems with much higher odds of losing but have a higher payout.  But I only do this with casino money.  I could never bet on Red and 0 at the same time with my money - that's a loser of a bet.....

those are the solutions you tried.
no way!
there are ways. without gymnics.
wanna pay?

[albertojonas]

Deliberately target the most opportunistic trend with a Boolean Principle as the result. Act on the result.

i would add that if you build a set of decision problems that may be solved in polynomial time, on a non-deterministic Turing machine, you would find yourself betting accordingly to what happens.
In a deterministic Turing machine, the set of rules prescribes at most one action to be performed for any given situation.
It just takes time to sink in and to master. After that is all profit.
Open your mind.

you can go wiki if you do not believe me.

[MauiSunset]

Guys it's real simple - prove to the world you can beat Roulette by taking my challenge and make $1,000 for your trouble.


Or you can snicker with each other and pretend you have broken Roulette; or even more silly pretend that secret gurus roam the casinos beating Roulette and you know they will never surface and prove their prowess at Roulette.


Right.


Me, I know Roulette can't be beaten - not for the last 200 years and not for another 200 years.  But I wish anyone taking my challenge the best of luck....

[Proofreaders2000]

Truth is the big winners are not at the forums (or they once were *Mr. J for example but now have the Grail(s) and moved on.

I saw Steve post on this thread maybe he can give some sage advice.