• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Do you have time to add your comment ...

Started by ego, Feb 28, 04:13 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego


I just play around with on idea using dozen.
You wait until a dozen repeat and then you wait it to stop repeating.
Then you bet once that next dozen will not repeat.

Simple.

Now the staking plan is to win two in a row after losing twice or more in a row to recoup previous loses.
I like the idea not to increase the bets or win two in a row after the first loss as you gain back half of your previous loss.

I would like some help developing the progression/staking plan with this method.
This is how it would look like ...

The progression for even money bets winning two in a row is as follows.
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 4 8 8 16 16 32 32 64 64

How would we create same but for dozen play.

1:1
1:1
1:1
2:2

???

Suggestions ...
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Kattila

Hi Ego , bet on two dozens right ?

You mean like this:

Doz

1
3
2
2
1  bet dozens 2 and 3 , bet once
1  L wait
3  bet d1/d2 once
1  W
2
3
3

2  bet d1/d3
2  L  wait
1  bet d2/d3
3  W
2
1
2
3

1  bet d2/d3
2  W
...so on...

progression could be Leveller
1/1, 2/2, 4/4 ( 8/8 optional) and stay on top
until in plus , then reset to 1/1

another progression could be
1/1, 2/2, 3/3, 5/5( 8/8 optional)stay on top until in plus
and reset to 1/1

Maybe can apply the Lw strategy (from Hermes)
after one L wait virtual W and bet for Ws until hit again
one L, wait again virtual W and bet for Ws....
Enemy LwLwLwLw.....

cheers

Kattila

Extra info :
Bet one dozen using positive progression.




Bet one dozen 4 times, if W or L go to next dozen and bet 4 times....
If after W hit same dozen  no bet ,wait other dozen and start to bet.
Progression  +1 after W / after 4Ls -1, when bankroll in plus reset to 1unit.
After twice in row L4, stop wait virtual W and bet again .




NR/ Doz

16  2  bet d2/1u
10  1  l1  -1
34  3  l2  -2
13  2  w   0
11  1  bet d1/2u
19  2  l1  -2
30  3  l2  -4
24  2  l3  -6
12  1  w  -2
12  wait
19  2  bet d2/3u
22  2  w  +4
24  wait
24
24
14
28  bet d3/1u
9    1  l1  +3
23  2  l2  +2
11  1  l3  +1
0       l4   0
12  1  bet d1/1u
7    1  w  +2
0
32  3  bet d3/2u
29  3  w  +6
23  2  bet d2/1u
15  2  w  +8
14  wait
15
5    1  bet d1/1u
6    1  w  +10
9    wait
9
24  2  bet d2/1u
29  3  l1  +9
15  2  w  +11
14  wait
31  3  bet d3/1u
9    1  l1 +10
35  3  w  +12
35  wait
16  2  bet d2/1u
36  3  l1  +11
29  3  l2  +10
6    1  l3  +9
20  2  w  +11
19  wait
14
3    1  bet d1/2u
1    1  w +15
30  3  bet d3/1u
28  3  w  +17
9   1  bet d1/1u
13  2  l1  +16
12  1  w +18
4    wait
16  2  bet d2/1u
8    1  l1  +17
11  1  l2  +16
25  3  l3  +15
8    1  l4  +14 
5    1  bet d1/1u
12  1  w  +16
21  2  bet d2/2u
8    1  l1  +14
5    1  l2  +12
24   2  w  +18
11  1  bet d1/1u
27  3  l1  +17
35  3  l2  +16
0       l3  +15
30  3  l4  +14
36  3  bet d3/1u
27  3  w  +16
26  wait
11  1  bet d1/2u
12  1  w  +20
29  3  bet d3/1u
9    1  l1  +19
29  3  w  +21
33  wait
33
1    1  bet d1/1u
18  2  l1  +20
28  3  l2  +19
26  3  l3  +18
8   1   w  +20
3   wait
30  3  bet d3/2u
35  w  +24
33  wait
8    1 bet d1/1u
7    1  w  +26
9    wait
15  2  bet d2/1u
8    1  l1  +25
5    1  l2  +24
15  2  w  +26
6    1  bet d1/2u
5    1  w  +30
13  2  bet d2/1u
34  3  l1  +29
35  3  l2  +28
27  3  l3  +26
21  2  w  +28
0
3   1  bet d1/2u
7   1  w  +32
36  3  bet d3/1u
30  3  w  +34
17  2  bet d2/1u
10  1  l1  +33
1    1  l2  +32
16  2  w  +34
31  3  bet d3/2u
7    1  l1 +32
34  3  w  +36
31  wait
12  1  bet d1/1u
3    1  w  +38
35  3  bet  d3/1u
16  2  l1  +37
34  3  w  +39
14  2  bet d2/1u
29  3  l1  +38
11  1  l2  +37
19  2  w  +39
17  wait
7    1   bet d1/2u
14  2  l1  +37
19  2  l2  +35
18  2  l3  +33
12  1  w  +37
24  2  bet d2/3u
36  3  l1  +34
11  1  l2  +31
3    1  l3  +28
31  3  l4  +25
13  2  bet d2/2u
6    1 l1  +23
23  2  w  +27
34  3  bet d3/3u
1    1  l1  +24
0       l2  +21
30  3  w  +27
14  2  bet d2/4u
19  2  w  +35
8    1  bet d1/1u (better reset now)
0        l1  +34
1    1  w  +36
20  2  bet d2/1u
22  2  w  +38
31  3  bet d3/1u
34  3  w  +40
15  2  bet d2/1u
33  3  l1  +39
8    1  l2  +38
17  2  w +40
11  1  bet d1/2u
18  2  l1  +38
7    1  w  +42
35  3  bet d3/1u
35  3  w  +44
20  2  bet d2/1u
32  3  l1  +43
18  2  w  +45
23  wait
14....so on....
33
18
15what do you think about this ?
also good results if bet the second last dozen
using some similar rules like above ( i can post some
example if someone wish)

cheers

catalyst

dear ego

your only best hope would be GLC--the last man standing!

GLC

Ego,  I just noticed your post.  Trying to work out the progression for a single parlay bet on double dozens isn't and exact science.  Here's the simple way:


1-1; 1-1 = +2
2-2; 2-2 = +4-2=+2
3-3; 4-4 = +7 -6=+1
6-6; 9-9 = +15-12=+3
11-11; 15-15=+26-24=+2
20-20; 30-30=+50-46=+4
etc....


You must win the first bet in each level to make the second bet.  What makes it not a perfect progression is that if you win the 1st bet and lose the 2nd bet, you lose the whole amount.


What I posted is like a martingale progression for double dozen bets.


You could create a D'Alembert progression and make it less risky.  Not foolproof, but a little less risky.


Sorry I don't have time right now to elaborate further, but I may have even misunderstood what you're after.


GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

ego

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-