• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

I Win With This System

Started by sniper, Mar 25, 08:23 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

eureka

Here is the FINAL chart against a single zero wheel with the same spins (double checked).  >:D

Good input Gamebreaker...




ophis

Rules of this system from 1st post sounds exacly the same as FMoDR by Albalaha....
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

sniper

Hello Boatran8,


After testing and playing real for 3 months I don't quite accept the results of the final chart on the single zero. With due respect I don't say you did wrong but I am quite certain the chart won't have the pattern as the last one.I could be wrong. The earlier one looks more likely. I dare not say the system won't fail, knowing that all system will fail in the end.


If you don't mind please send me the Rx code and I can check through my spins and verify the results with you.


Anyway, thank you very much for your time.


Regards

sniper


Hello Ophis


QuoteThis system was posted in the forum sometime back. I tweaked the mm and have been winning for the last 3 months. I could be lucky, I don't know. Perhaps it really work. I would like to share it here so you guys could prove me wrong if I am indeed lucky. I think a tracker or RX would be ideal in this case.

Yes, the rules of the system is from Al's FMoDR. I tweaked the mm hoping to make it more practical to play.


Regards

eureka

Quote from: sniper on Mar 27, 09:13 PM 2012
Hello Boatran8,


After testing and playing real for 3 months I don't quite accept the results of the final chart on the single zero. With due respect I don't say you did wrong but I am quite certain the chart won't have the pattern as the last one.I could be wrong. The earlier one looks more likely. I dare not say the system won't fail, knowing that all system will fail in the end.


If you don't mind please send me the Rx code and I can check through my spins and verify the results with you.


Anyway, thank you very much for your time.


Regards

hello Sniper,

please refer to this topic : :.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=9324.msg77855#msg77855

Thanks

eureka

Dear Sniper,

Following our long mail conversation,

I finally changed my mind, so now, people, you have another proof of my coding skills.

Find attached the .dgt file and the 80000 live spins used for the tests.

But people be aware its my last free release.

Private coding upon request with a non-disclosure agreement.

regards

marivo

I compare your rx  code with the system in Ophis's Multi Systems Tracker and I think you are betting to much numbers.  ???
Sniper: does rx code work under your rules?

eureka

Quote from: marivo on Mar 28, 05:33 PM 2012
I compare your rx  code with the system in Ophis's Multi Systems Tracker and I think you are betting to much numbers.  ???
Sniper: does rx code work under your rules?

You are right to ask Sniper's confirmation but as per the instructions it bets all the repeaters tracked during past 17 spins. And retrack on every spins. Doesn't remove the last on a win.

marivo

Quote from: boatran8 on Mar 28, 05:39 PM 2012
And re-track on every spins.
Re-track, as I understand it, means he bets only the numbers which qualify in last 17 spins and not the numbers which have been qualified in past too.
"Ridiculous" example:
1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16--->number 2 qualify
1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17---->number 17 qualify and number 2 doesn't qualify any more.

eureka

Quote from: marivo on Mar 28, 05:53 PM 2012
Re-track, as I understand it, means he bets only the numbers which qualify in last 17 spins and not the numbers which have been qualified in past too.
"Ridiculous" example:
1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16--->number 2 qualify
1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17---->number 17 qualify and number 2 doesn't qualify any more.

Correct. That's what Sniper asked when I asked him confirmation for the same matter.

Skakus

thanks for the .dgt file boatran8.

I just played four 300 spin sessions randomly plucked from a pile of actuals and the results were,

-170

-413

-55

-323

That's a poor result on spins that my own repeater system managed to defeat.

I've seen enough. Thanks for your efforts though guys.
A ship moored in the harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are made for.

sniper

Hello Boatran8,


QuoteRe-track, as I understand it, means he bets only the numbers which qualify in last 17 spins and not the numbers which have been qualified in past too.
"Ridiculous" example:
1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16--->number 2 qualify
1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17---->number 17 qualify and number 2 doesn't qualify any more.

Thank you very much for the coding. I just checked through, what Marivo said was correct. We bet only the repeaters from the last 17 numbers and not all the repeaters which have been qualified in the past.


We always look at the last 17 numbers and bet all the repeaters within the last 17 numbers.


Regards

sniper

Hello Boatran8,


Example


oldest number at the top


1)14
2)7
3)2
4)0
5)29
6)5
7)25
8)23
9)11
10)17
11)29
12)24    (bet 29)
13)1      (bet 29)
14)11    (bet 29)
15)27    (bet 29, 11)
16)13    (bet 29, 11)
17)30    (bet 29, 11)
18)22    (bet 29, 11)
19)16    (bet 29, 11)
20)28    (bet 29, 11)
21)9      (bet 29, 11)
22)2      (bet 29, 11)
22)3      (bet 11 only) drop 29 because it's not repeater in last 17 spins.




Regards


Robeenhuut

Quote from: Skakus on Mar 28, 06:28 PM 2012
thanks for the .dgt file boatran8.

I just played four 300 spin sessions randomly plucked from a pile of actuals and the results were,

-170

-413

-55

-323

That's a poor result on spins that my own repeater system managed to defeat.

I've seen enough. Thanks for your efforts though guys.

In my opinion you can not play any repeater system after you get your first hit unless you wait few virtual loses. Depending how many repeaters i have after first hit i sometimes wait few extra spins to start betting.  Usually i reset after first hit. But it requires time and patience. Yesterday for example i got my first hit after 3 spins when i bet on 5 numbers and after waiting 5 extra spins got another hit after additional 15 spins. I ended up betting 12 numbers because i kept adding repeaters. I never leave off hit number and i adjust my bets to stay in profit after next potential hit.
I also would not leave off repeaters once i start betting on them like  Sniper does.
To me it defies a whole purpose of this system. Once you start tracking you have to bet on all repeaters that appeared on board. So look at last 18 spins or just start adding them up as you continue to track and bet on all repeaters.  The ones that you left off usually hit in next few spins  O0   
Hard part of this system is that  you have to keep adding new repeaters and adjust your bets. I have 45 sec to place a bet so i need to be very alert. In a rough session i just described i was down 300u but you need at least 1000u bankroll to play this way. If you don't wait you need  around 5000u but i would recommend playing my way. I never waited more than 28 spins for a win and never needed more than 500 or 600u bankroll.
But it requires patience and time.

Regards   
Matt

sniper

Hello Boatran8,


Could you please kindly fix up the code so we can test further.


Yesterday I had a bad streak and was down 600 units plus and betting 4 units per repeater. As usual, the winning started to come after a bad start, I ended up 60 units.


Regards

-