I Win With This System

[sniper]

This system was posted in the forum sometime back. I tweaked the mm and have been winning for the last 3 months. I could be lucky, I don't know. Perhaps it really work. I would like to share it here so you guys could prove me wrong if I am indeed lucky. I think a tracker or RX would be ideal in this case.


The system is to bet on all repeaters by looking back at the last 17 spins. When the 18th spin appears, drop the 1st spin. Look for repeaters within the last 17 numbers and bet all. When the 19th spin appears, drop the 2nd spin and continue the procedure over and over again. Do not drop any numbers after a hit. Just follow the rules as above.


I believe the strength is in the mm. We will never know which number is going to win before spinning. Each and every number have the same 1 in 37 chances for a single zero wheel. We start off by betting 1 unit on each qualified number ( REPEATER). For each bet, the count is 1. If we bet 3 numbers, the count is 3. We continue adding the count until a hit. On each hit we minus 30 from the accumulative count. If the count is negative, it means we are winning and we will start the count all over again. We will always start all over again whenever the count goes negative. Say we started playing and loss a certain number of spins and the count goes to 60. We hit a win on a 1 unit bet, the count goes down to 30 (60-30=30) and will proceed and continue counting from 30.


When the count is above 100, we will bet 2 units on all repeaters. For a 2 units bet, the count is 2 on each number. If we bet on 4 numbers, the count is 8. On a hit we minus 60 instead of 30 since we are betting 2 units. If the running count goes negative, we will start all over again as mentioned above. If the running or accumulative count goes back to 100 and below we will revert back to betting 1 unit on each number.


When the count goes above 300, we bet 3 units. On a win we minus 90 (3x30=90).
When the count goes above 600, we bet 4 units. On a win we minus 120 from the accumulative count. When the count is above 1000, we bet 5 units.
We drop the bet whenever the count goes back to previous lower levels.
As you can see here,for 1 unit we bet to a count of 100. For 2 units, 200. for 3 unit a count of 300 and for 6 units a count of 600.


I do not guarantee it will work forever. I do not say it's a winning system. I learned the system from this forum and spent more than 6 months testing. After tweaking the mm I started playing with real money in B&M casino and have been winning good money for the last 3 months. Please do not play for real before you tested it out and I will not be responsible for any losses from the outcome of using the above system.


Regards

[Robeenhuut]

This system was posted in the forum sometime back. I tweaked the mm and have been winning for the last 3 months. I could be lucky, I don't know. Perhaps it really work. I would like to share it here so you guys could prove me wrong if I am indeed lucky. I think a tracker or RX would be ideal in this case.


The system is to bet on all repeaters by looking back at the last 17 spins. When the 18th spin appears, drop the 1st spin. Look for repeaters within the last 17 numbers and bet all. When the 19th spin appears, drop the 2nd spin and continue the procedure over and over again. Do not drop any numbers after a hit. Just follow the rules as above.


I believe the strength is in the mm. We will never know which number is going to win before spinning. Each and every number have the same 1 in 37 chances for a single zero wheel. We start off by betting 1 unit on each qualified number ( REPEATER). For each bet, the count is 1. If we bet 3 numbers, the count is 3. We continue adding the count until a hit. On each hit we minus 30 from the accumulative count. If the count is negative, it means we are winning and we will start the count all over again. We will always start all over again whenever the count goes negative. Say we started playing and loss a certain number of spins and the count goes to 60. We hit a win on a 1 unit bet, the count goes down to 30 (60-30=30) and will proceed and continue counting from 30.


When the count is above 100, we will bet 2 units on all repeaters. For a 2 units bet, the count is 2 on each number. If we bet on 4 numbers, the count is 8. On a hit we minus 60 instead of 30 since we are betting 2 units. If the running count goes negative, we will start all over again as mentioned above. If the running or accumulative count goes back to 100 and below we will revert back to betting 1 unit on each number.


When the count goes above 300, we bet 3 units. On a win we minus 90 (3x30=90).
When the count goes above 600, we bet 4 units. On a win we minus 120 from the accumulative count. When the count is above 1000, we bet 5 units.
We drop the bet whenever the count goes back to previous lower levels.
As you can see here,for 1 unit we bet to a count of 100. For 2 units, 200. for 3 unit a count of 300 and for 6 units a count of 600.


I do not guarantee it will work forever. I do not say it's a winning system. I learned the system from this forum and spent more than 6 months testing. After tweaking the mm I started playing with real money in B&M casino and have been winning good money for the last 3 months. Please do not play for real before you tested it out and I will not be responsible for any losses from the outcome of using the above system.


Regards

Its like very well known Pivot system. Either you wait 36 spins and bet on all repeaters using progression to stay in profit after you get a hit or you start betting if you see 2 repeaters and you keep adding them up.
I recommend both versions.

Regards

[sniper]

Hello Robeenhuut,


Thanks for your recommendation. The million $$$ question here is, will the mm I mentioned work for this system or I am just plain lucky for the past 3 months. I played 6 days a week, averaged about 200 spins per day. Winning averaged 86 units per day. Largest draw down 600 units so far and it happened only once in 3 months. Normal draw down is about 100 to 150 units and most of the time less than 50.


Regards

[dennisbelle]

"When the count goes above 600, we bet 4 units"


"for 6 units a count of 600"

When the count is above 600 do you bet 4 units or 6 units?

[sniper]

Hello Dennisbelle,


We bet 4 units when the running count is above 600. Sorry for the confusion. What I meant was, when we are betting 6 units we will bet till we lost 600 units before we go to the 7 units level. For each level we must lose 100 bets before we move up to next level. At 1 unit betting, when we lose 100 units we go to 2 units betting. At 2 units betting, we will to to 3 units after we lose 200 units. By this time our total loss will be 300 units (100 units of 1 unit bet and 200 units of 2 units bet). Hope this answer your question.

Regards

[Robeenhuut]

Hello Robeenhuut,


Thanks for your recommendation. The million $$$ question here is, will the mm I mentioned work for this system or I am just plain lucky for the past 3 months. I played 6 days a week, averaged about 200 spins per day. Winning averaged 86 units per day. Largest draw down 600 units so far and it happened only once in 3 months. Normal draw down is about 100 to 150 units and most of the time less than 50.


Regards

Generally from my experience playing repeaters in last 36 spins when you get between usually 2 and 12 numbers you have to be prepared to go without hit for 20+ spins. The highest number i saw was 28 spins. In such a case you need bankroll of at least 5000u. I play it simply by adjusting size of the bet to be in profit. If you bet on repeaters from the beginning starting with 2 numbers your requirements should be similar. 16000 spins you played is pretty high number and should give some indication about any system.  But you need to be prepared to got without hit for well above 20 spins. The size of your largest draw down indicates that you never went over 20 spins.

Regards

[Robeenhuut]

And one more thing. I would suggest resetting after first hit. It happens that after a first hit your gap between hits could be very large especially  when you get early hit but then we are talking about a bit different system.

Regards

[sniper]

Hello Boatran8,


Could you please kindly try this on RX. This could possibly turn out to be a winner.


Thanks and Regards

[eureka]

Hello Sniper,

I have coded it into RX.

PM me for details.


My advice : as Robeenhut said, reset after a win

[vladir]

Can you share the results please?

[sniper]

Hello Boatran8,


Thank you very much for coding the system in RX. Could you please kindly share the results. By the way, I have already pm you. I still continue winning using this system.


Yesterday I won 50 units. Today I hit a bad streak and drop 250 units at one point and finally ended up winning 90 units. I could probably be lucky and I have a feeling it will tank as time goes.

I remembered testing another quite similar repeater system years back in VIP forum. The system survived 1.2 million spins and showing a steady profit tested using RX. There were pull back occasionally but nothing alarming. I thought I found the grail and was very excited. After further testing for 300,000 spins the system started to crack and slowly fell apart beyond recovery. I was not shocked but slightly dissapointed.

Regards and Best wishes to you and family.

[Drazen]

Dear sniper are you aware of what you just said.


System "survived" 1.2 million spins... Where would you be after that? You would drink cognac in your own chateau at the south of the France. And you wouldne give a darn for the rest of the spins.


[size=78%]But wait, you can't play in reality so much spins in your whole life. And not for the next life after reincarnation if you were born to works a dealer too [/size]


Every time is new day, new visit to casino, new numbers.


But how many average sessions you would get if system can win 1.2 million spins. How much days you would went out as a winner?


That is the way you should think.


Regards


Drazen

[sniper]

Hello Drazen_cro,

My friend, sorry for the misunderstanding. The 1.2 million spins was during testing and not actual play. I did not play that system in real casino after the test failed.

Regards

[Drazen]

My point was that you should consider playing  it then. Do you know how much is 1.2 million spins. Darn much.



Everything fails in the longterm, because of negative expectancy. But when you transfer that in real life and normaln average session lenght, well that is another story.


Regards


Drazen

[sniper]

Hello Drazen_cro,


Thanks my friend. I know what you mean, we will never be able to play 1.2 million spins in our life time. I did tried to work out something but never finalized. I tried to implement stop loss and profit objective but somehow dropped the idea.


Regards