Code this and you're a bloody genius > The Texas Sharpshooter

[Ralph]

All methods using repeaters, takes in account the numbers we bet are at least not sleeping now.  In a lot of trials I have found it in fact differ, if not a lot, it differ. A number shown  2 times in the last 21 spins hit a fraction more than a number not showing. So I do not use sleeper methods. Using 10000 units as bankroll aiming for 1000 plus, I have succeeded 43 times in a row.

I have seen a sleeper of 1008 spins, which I  think very few have done, and I am sure it will not happen to me once again. Even 600 spins sleep, is very uncommon, we see it mostly in simulations.

Using repeating numbers is a fallacy, which can be proving with math, but it is a fallacy which has been working for me.
By the way, the name of the fallacy is "Texas Sharpshooter", and it is not rare in scientist papers.

The pic shows the probability of sleeping.

[ego]

All methods using repeaters, takes in account the numbers we bet are at least not sleeping now.  In a lot of trials I have found it in fact differ, if not a lot, it differ. A number shown  2 times in the last 21 spins hit a fraction more than a number not showing. So I do not use sleeper methods. Using 10000 units as bankroll aiming for 1000 plus, I have succeeded 43 times in a row.

I have seen a sleeper of 1008 spins, which I  think very few have done, and I am sure it will not happen to me once again. Even 600 spins sleep, is very uncommon, we see it mostly in simulations.

Using repeating numbers is a fallacy, which can be proving with math, but it is a fallacy which has been working for me.
By the way, the name of the fallacy is "Texas Sharpshooter", and it is not rare in scientist papers.

The pic shows the probability of sleeping.

Nice to see that you also find this kind of methods better then chasing for sleepers ...
What kind of this kind of methods did you find out being best?
Was it The Texas Sharpshooter or any other method.

Cheers.

[Ralph]

Nice to see that you also find this kind of methods better then chasing for sleepers ...
What kind of this kind of methods did you find out being best?
Was it The Texas Sharpshooter or any other method.

Cheers.

Most of the methods which is inside bets I use relay on repeaters.   I have demonstrated a few here or at other fora.
The most used scripts in the bot I did is repeating methods.

Today and yesterday I used a new tweak, which has so far won every session.  It is not any magic at all, we play the repeating numbers and they use to be blessed of Lady Luck.  The progressions should be soft, if our numbers delay, we count with a cluster soon, and one hit will not allways put us back. Even low stakes as 0.1 add up to Euros, if we hit a straight up.(0.3 x 36= 10.8 ) .

The unfair odds will make problems after a certain numbers of spins, so a NOZ is easier. If the table has 5.25 or 2.7 HE I would never play EC. The payout is too small, we have to turn over the bankroll  many times and it will be very hard to come out a head.

If we play a few numbers only (or just one) we can overcome the zerofactor more often.

[Azim]

Does anyone have the rules for this system?

I would like to try and attempt to make a tracker for it.

Any info will be greatly appreciated.

[Ross]

The kind of idea that appeals to me.

Working on a programme.

Results very good so far.

Will post it when tested.

[Roulettebeater]

Trying to beat roulette with such approaches/systems is like you walk on eggs and you don’t want that they get smashed !