HYBRID DC4

[warrior]

 ex 1a2c     2b3c       3c2a
     1a2c
     1a2c 2 in row is rare but it does not mean it cannot happen ,any one looking for a long run strategy start training in a marathon i did not say it will win in the long run so read the thread carefully i do not want this thread to repeat its self on the same issues.thank you

[warrior]

I have won with this for the last year never lost 

[Bettor 27]

...i have tested this for 5000 games never lost but you never no, and played for the last year never lost...

Hi warrior,

What was your largest drawdown in these games before +5 was achieved?

Regards

B27

[Nickmsi]

 Hi Warrior . . .
Yes, I am familiar with Code4 and D & C.  Your Hybrid DC4 was very close to them so it took very little time to re-code Excel with your bet selection.


I am here to help by showing with concrete spreadsheets what results one can expect.  Please, people don't shoot the messenger.


Testing is what I do while looking for ways to win.  I'm a test-a-holic.


I have tested over a hundred systems and have learned a good deal in doing so.


To help anyone looking to further their knowledge of this type Matrix betting, I am happy to attach my original tracking spreadsheets for CODE4, DC20Spins, and even RDC20 spins (Reverse Divide & Conquer).


Enjoy and if I can help further,  just advise.


Nick

[warrior]

Hi Warrior . . .
Yes, I am familiar with Code4 and D & C.  Your Hybrid DC4 was very close to them so it took very little time to re-code Excel with your bet selection.


I am here to help by showing with concrete spreadsheets what results one can expect.  Please, people don't shoot the messenger.


Testing is what I do while looking for ways to win.  I'm a test-a-holic.


I have tested over a hundred systems and have learned a good deal in doing so.


To help anyone looking to further their knowledge of this type Matrix betting, I am happy to attach my original tracking spreadsheets for CODE4, DC20Spins, and even RDC20 spins (Reverse Divide & Conquer).


Enjoy and if I can help further,  just advise.


Nick

Your trying to tell me that you had 2losses in a row within 50 spin,if show me the numbers from those 50 spins i would like tpo see them , but for now i do not want this thread mixed up with all those other attachment ,ps in my 5000 spin test i had one loss of 2 in a row and playing real money not one ,if your playing rng that would explaine things a little. 

[warrior]

Hi warrior,

What was your largest drawdown in these games before +5 was achieved?

Regards

B27

I had one loss in the testing phase of 11 33 99 - 11 33 99  that's 2 losses in a row none in real money play I'm not there long enough to give all back.960 units in the plus playing 4 days a week for 5 units a day, in the last year.

[vile]

Live B&M or online,Warrior.

[warrior]

Live B&M or online,Warrior.

B&M ONLY.

[vile]

--Where if I may ask.

[warrior]

--Where if I may ask.

IN CANADA

[Bettor 27]

I had one loss in the testing phase of 11 33 99 - 11 33 99  that's 2 losses in a row none in real money play I'm not there long enough to give all back.960 units in the plus playing 4 days a week for 5 units a day, in the last year.

Wow - congratulations on the +960 unit’s warrior!!!

With “11 33 99”, you mean you recorded a loss of 27 units 1 time in testing â€" right?

So your take profit is +5, but how many units are you risking (stop loss)? Is it:

(i)   1+1, 3+3, 9+9 (risk 27 units)?
(ii)   1 unit up on loss, 1 unit down on a win or until even or positive â€" risking how many units?
(iii)   2 units up on a loss, 1 unit down on a win â€" risking how many units?

Also is your play trigger:

(a)   After first outcome?
(b)   After first 2 outcomes match then play next 2 outcomes (that means in case of   a repeat you wont loose 3 in a row only 2). Then wait for next trigger and bet for only 5 outcomes instead of 6?

Regards

B 27

[atlantis]

Hi warrior,
This seems like a strong system. I suppose you could also play in reverse notation - instead of "doz/col/doz/col" you could play using the "col/doz/col/doz" format - or even play both in tandem using the same numbers!! (Or a second player might use the "column first" recording using the same numbers as you)

For instance, keeping the safety rule and playing after 2 matches:

36 9 25 13 23 28  (first 6 numbers set up default first line - doz first and equivalent col first)
then following numbers:   3 34 5 18 6 17 31 15 27 15 27 19 36 27 2 17


original dozen first notation                equivalent column first notation
1a3c           2b3a           3c2a     ***    a1c1         b2a2         c3b3    (first line)
================================================   
1a1c                             3c3a                                             c3c3
1b3c                             3c1b                                             c2a2
                                    3b3c                                             c2c3
                                                                                        c3b2

w1st                                                  w1st
w1st                                                  w1st
w1st     
                                           
+5 overall from both ways of recording   (wins in bold)

A.

[warrior]

bettor 27 it depends on how safe you want to play, it depends on what you want to risk,look at the play of atlantis , you can choose to wait for the first repeat then go in for 2 spins if you lose its 11 33  that you lose, wait for the next trigger on that line then go in for 99 27 27 but if you lose those 4 you still have one more bet on that line total 5 th spin but i don't progress from there i take the loss of the 4 spins but i go back to 11 on the 5th spin i hope that makes sense,now you can choose 1 up on a loss one down on a win, 1234 and so on ,if you want to flat bet thisu the only way i think is play for a 100 place bets then look at your total then if your down in the next 100 raise it by one unit unitl even or profit.warrior

[warrior]

Hi warrior,
This seems like a strong system. I suppose you could also play in reverse notation - instead of "doz/col/doz/col" you could play using the "col/doz/col/doz" format - or even play both in tandem using the same numbers!! (Or a second player might use the "column first" recording using the same numbers as you)

For instance, keeping the safety rule and playing after 2 matches:

36 9 25 13 23 28  (first 6 numbers set up default first line - doz first and equivalent col first)
then following numbers:   3 34 5 18 6 17 31 15 27 15 27 19 36 27 2 17


original dozen first notation                equivalent column first notation
1a3c           2b3a           3c2a     ***    a1c1         b2a2         c3b3    (first line)
================================================   
1a1c                             3c3a                                             c3c3
1b3c                             3c1b                                             c2a2
                                    3b3c                                             c2c3
                                                                                        c3b2

w1st                                                  w1st
w1st                                                  w1st
w1st     
                                           
+5 overall from both ways of recording   (wins in bold)

A.

i have tried the reverse with the colums first ,not the greatis results it shows to many double losses but it you track both and wait for those double losses third line loss i would bet but be carefull with that on colums are like beautyifull women then babang.

[Robeenhuut]

i have tried the reverse with the columns first ,not the greatis results it shows to many double losses but it you track both and wait for those double losses third line loss i would bet but be carefull with that on columns are like beautyifull women then babang.

Hello Warrior

I think we should put in some benchmark when testing some posted systems here. Anything tested less than 5K does not tell me anything. I tested some systems (RX and live spins data) and lots of systems tanked after 5k spins after it worked before . Its just a figure and it depends on a system you test. Let me give you an example.
You bet against 1/3 chance event happening (DZ,CL,DS) 4 times in a row. You have 1/81 chance of winning (Code 4 for example). You would need at least 10 times number of games of your chance of winning to give you an idea how the system performs. So test 1000 games.
Get P4 - 1/8 chance of losing in 3 times.  Play at least 100 games  and verify results.
Roulette can not be beaten by applying probability and distribution laws but... you can eliminate some systems. If they perform poorly in testing applying  these rules just forget about them.
Its not always that easy to estimate your probability of success but you can always get strike ratio and usually determine if the system has some potential. I would not play any system that relies on any straight progression without applying any stop - loss and win - goal values.

Regards