LAMBS FOR THE SHEARING

[F_LAT_INO]

We shouldn't alow--as a sharing community-certain individuals
exercising theirs CON approach on this forum.
They are using all kind of CON tricks to make you -
LAMBS FOR THE SHEARING.
Be aware.

[Twisteruk]

Please be more specific to whom you refer too, so we can be more diligent

Thank You 

[F_LAT_INO]

Please be more specific to whom you refer too, so we can be more diligent

Thank You  

Oh,no man---you all are adults,and can read between the lines.

[WannaWin]

We do not need to read hard to predict albalaha selling systems and consultancy and now Mr. Victor soliciting money in exchange of a betting service.

I am not opposed to funds to be donated strictly for forum maintenance, but I am opposed to the selling of products and consulting of roulette in the forum.

It reminds me Mr. Steve of previous VLSroulette forum that supposedly wins millions with teams of players at his disposal yet he has the need to sell roulette products.

Perhaps the winners do not win enough to avoid having to sell their services?

Software such as Roulette Xtreme is fair. People should be good to pay for testing software but ultimately they must call the bets based on their own tests results and not on a system or service sold to them that is faulty because it had to be sold to make a profit to the creator.

I hope I am not banned for saying this.

WannaWin

[Twisteruk]

Is it not about choice ?

I will choose to try Victor's free service when it launch's. If its good I will choose to pay. If it is not, I wont.

Simple choice in my opinion  

[Bayes]

We've been through this before so I'm not going to repeat myself. What irritates me is that F_LAT_INO doesn't come out and say "There are persons X and Y whom I have reason to believe are running some kind of scam, and here is the evidence". No, he just makes vague accusations so everyone is wondering who it is and what they're supposed to have done. It helps no-one and just makes everyone wary and distrustful for no good reason.

[Twisteruk]

We've been through this before so I'm not going to repeat myself. What irritates me is that F_LAT_INO doesn't come out and say "There are persons X and Y whom I have reason to believe are running some kind of scam, and here is the evidence". No, he just makes vague accusations so everyone is wondering who it is and what they're supposed to have done. It helps no-one and just makes everyone wary and distrustful for no good reason.

I agree 100% Bayes

I dont like vague. Never have.

Be specific or say nothing at all 

[VLS]

and now Mr. Victor soliciting money in exchange of a betting service.

Hello dear WannaWin,

If it delivers a good hit rate then it can't be labeled a scam, but a legitimate service. One for which members would be happy to pay for since they are getting value for their $1 dollar per session.

I invite you to have an extensive free test when it comes up later this month.

I hope I am not banned for saying this.

WannaWin

Don't worry; you are not going to be banned. You are expressing your mind and it is okay that people have doubts before the release of the tool. I hope they get dissipated by trying. It isn't a subjective method after all. It is deterministic so you can clearly say if it works or it doesn't and I won't (and can't) excuse myself on the traditional: "you didn't apply the method right", because there is nothing to "apply".

Simply entering the numbers on the page and getting your predictions from the tool.

This works to the benefit of the members.

When confronted, some system sellers just say: "you didn't looked for the proper roulette wheel to apply it", "you deviated from the system's rules" or after being too confronted, they launch a new version that "works this time" (geez, it reminds me of the IBS "infallible system"... currently in version 8 (!))

What I offer is really straightforward, really black and white. If it works it works, if it doesn't it doesn't. I offer a sufficiently large free trial, currently appointed Bayes to make a software that tests people's actuals in an automated fashion so in one day they could test all their personal actuals and get a win-to-lose average without having to spend hours entering numbers manually.

At least nobody can accuse me of not being transparent with it. How many "scammers" are willing to offer this kind of free trial

Regards.
Victor

[Bayes]

I won't (and can't) excuse myself on the traditional: "you didn't apply the method right", because there is nothing to "apply".

Bravo Victor! How refreshing it is to hear this. 

[Twisteruk]

Key Word:




transparent




Very well said Victor  

[VLS]

How refreshing it is to hear this. 

It would actually be detrimental to have any human intervention on it. Statistical averages are not open to interpretation.

[VLS]

Key Word:
transparent

Absoutelly. Let's time be the judge.

Time always places everyone where they should be after all  

Cheers!

[Bayes]

It would actually be detrimental to have any human intervention on it. Statistical averages are not open to interpretation.

yes, YES, YES! 

[F_LAT_INO]

We've been through this before so I'm not going to repeat myself. What irritates me is that F_LAT_INO doesn't come out and say "There are persons X and Y whom I have reason to believe are running some kind of scam, and here is the evidence". No, he just makes vague accusations so everyone is wondering who it is and what they're supposed to have done. It helps no-one and just makes everyone wary and distrustful for no good reason.

Dear Bayes,
If you read my recent comments and private sections arguments with these guys/which you evidently didn't/then you will certainly know whom am I talking about.You kind of act like naive angel,as if you don't know about it.You are not blind I hope,or either you don't read all threads throughouly.I DO.Amen

[Bayes]

FYI, I haven't read EVERY post on this forum, so I may have missed your comments. And why didn't you point this out to Twisteruk when he asked you to be more specific? all you said was "we are all adults and can read between the lines"