Numerology = nonsense

[WannaWin]

Please.

Numerology has to do with the serious study of roulette the same as using tarot cards to know the precise moment to launch atomic particles in the accelerator of the CERN institute.

Total nonsense.

Roulette is primarily physical.

Secondary to this roulette is statistical.

Roulette is not and can never be numbers ruled by Kabbalah, esoterism, ancient magical squares of the sun and similar disciplines.

There is a topic in the forum claiming that after the number 27 the color black comes more than it should. This shows an ignorance of the most elementary rules of the game of roulette.

A lack of long-term knowledge of statistics.

It is proven beyond any doubt that after any number of roulette from 0 to 36 it will come an equal number of times the color red and an equal number of times the color black less -2.7% from the normal shows of green zero.

I do not consider myself an expert but I know what makes the player lose. Using something as senseless such as after number 27 then your bet the color black will come is a certain way to lose.

These posts do nothing but to detract the seriousness from the forum.

Example. Kabbalah: a discipline and school of thought concerned with the mystical aspect of Rabbinic Judaism. It is a set of esoteric teachings meant to explain the relationship between an eternal and mysterious Creator and the mortal ".

It is an insult to the true followers of this faith to use their principles combined with gambling found in a casino.

Not to mention the insult it is for serious scholars of statistics. Those persons in the mathematics field who use the roulette game as a test of probability field in Monte Carlo modeling and serious people who really know how to use statistical tools for measuring the roulette game correctly.

If this forum is going to be serious, please remove all references to the nonsense amalgamation of numerology and roulette.

Please other members support.

If it is going to be the published material of this kind here the serious people will be gone away from the forum and only remain the people that claim the invisible and mystical is what rules the game we study.

To be our loss.

WannaWin

[Twisteruk]

I agree with you.

But disagree about censorship by Victor, or any Mod come to that (within reason)

If some ppl choose to have a certain pov then let them

I choose to read all posts as I enjoy reading different ppl's pov

Then, its our informed choice to choose how we wish to pick our number(s). Is it not ?



Just my 9 cents 

[Bayes]

I agree 100%. Sad to think that this kind of bilge is being perpetuated on this forum, and personally I find it embarrassing to be associated with it.  

[WannaWin]

link:://rouletteforum.cc/bet-selection/roulette-is-not-that-random/

How is it that so obviously misleading topic is published since Aug. 6 and has not been erased?

Maybe it is time to reconsider how the work of filtering topics is being done.

[WannaWin]

I agree with you.

But disagree about censorship by Victor, or any Mod come to that (within reason)

If some people choose to have a certain pov then let them

I choose to read all posts as I enjoy reading different people's pov

Then, its our informed choice to choose how we wish to pick our number(s). Is it not ?



Just my 9 cents  

There is a moral issue involved in it. If we are honest it does more harm to leave the lies published than to censor the liars.

What if they get disgusted with the forum and get mad by the censoring? It is better they get mad and leave to spread their lies somewhere else.

WannaWin

[Bayes]

If it were my forum, I would remove all the posts, but it isn't so I guess I have to live with it. The only reason I haven't commented earlier is because I would like to make a positive contribution here, and not see it go the way of VLS, GG etc.

It's up to Victor.

[Bayes]

I don't know what Mr Chips thinks about numerology, but he has clear rules regarding Advantage-play on his forum:

This Forum is dedicated to Roulette systems and Strategies, designed and constructed
to make a profit in the long term.

The accepted view of how to play roulette in a casino is the one adopted by this Forum.

This precludes, wheel watchers e.g. visual ballistic activities and the dubious practice
of looking for bias wheels, which has nothing to do with the actual game of Roulette
and is frowned on by the casino's and the ordinary player, as it is in the interests of both
player and casino to have a legitimately balanced wheel.

and:

It is expected that Members will not post or send PM's that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-orientated, or otherwise violates any laws.

The Administration reserves the right to remove, edit or close any thread for any reason.

All Roulette systems produced on this Forum are free and therefore system sellers are not welcome and any link to a system for sale will be removed.

This Forum respects copyright and we will never knowingly allow copyright to be infringed and will
take action to remove any post, providing proof of ownership of copyright is established.

Not saying I necessarily agree with the Advantage-play thing, just making the point that there are clear boundaries regarding what is and isn't acceptable. Here there is nothing, so it becomes an issue of "censorship" if some ways of playing are deemed unacceptable or invalid. This forum is for "system players" - what does that mean, exactly?

[WannaWin]

link:://rouletteforum.cc/general-discussion/forum-rules/

SCOPE OF THE DISCUSSION:

WE ARE A ROULETTE SYSTEMS FORUM.

We do not allow themes like: Numerology, astrology...

What worth are some rules that are not going to be enforced?

[WannaWin]

Removing numerology posts is not extreme censorship but common sense to protect the uninformed.

What if I tell the members my way to select the numbers is that when the dealer pulled a fart I put the numbers 9, 14 and 8 and won consistently by sniffing the rear of the dealer to know when to bet?

Is it okay to leave every publication of any nonsense in order to protect the forum from censorship?

The lies of James Wendel were unproven theories that could never be tested because he never published his alleged methodology to beat all the casino table games on none of the many forums he participated in the past.

The numerology people do not even bother to develop theories that can not be checked, but spreading obvious lies (like there is a magical relationship between numbers like 27 and numbers painted with color black) that is already proven over and over again it doesn't work.

I do not know what is the gain of publishing lies like that or who make them publish it, but I know that it takes a simulator of roulette with a large number sample enough to draw conclusions from long term statistics to deny it. The math says it. Common sense says it too.

There should be a better process of filtering posts.

[VLS]

Hello guys.

Weââ,¬â,,¢ll work something out with Compa. Perhaps we can agree itââ,¬â,,¢s the wording being used what should be worked.

Not the same to say: ââ,¬Å"I tested 3000 spins and in this numerical sample Black came after 27 more than expectedââ,¬Â, than to say ââ,¬Å"you can beat roulette by betting black after number 27 is spunââ,¬Â.

...I know we are having this debate because everybody wants the best for the forum.

Now letââ,¬â,,¢s wait for some input from Compa and other members regarding the post reported to the community council. We sure can work it out.

In the mean time, I have censored the URL to the numerology website as a way to enforce the rules.

By the way: No member is going to be banned. Instead letââ,¬â,,¢s use this as an opportunity to set clearer statutes to reach grounds in good terms.

Iââ,¬â,,¢m sure by setting a clear criterion on the right wording we have to use in the forum, we can avoid misunderstandings of this kind in the future.

Regards,
Victor

[VLS]

What if I tell the members my way to select the numbers is that when the dealer pulled a fart I put the numbers 9, 14 and 8 and won consistently by sniffing the rear of the dealer to know when to bet?

hahahaha OMG! now that's a "bet selection"!

[attachimg=#]



Thanks for putting some fun on the table WannaWin

[F_LAT_INO]

If it were my forum, I would remove all the posts, but it isn't so I guess I have to live with it. The only reason I haven't commented earlier is because I would like to make a positive contribution here, and not see it go the way of VLS, GG etc.

It's up to Victor.

Contributions?
You must be joking Bayes.
What kind of contribution did you ever make?
Expect critics,slimy kind of approach with Victor,destroyijng and
hammer any possible successful method posted/like mine,which I proved you wrong with 13 Wiesbaden daily actuals....all 13 sessions winning/but you haven't been heard there since,like a xxxxx----and BTW-DO YOU KNOW WHY BLACK MOSTLY HIT AFTER 27???
Ofcourse that you don't,as you are in this game from yesterday,and probably never entered casino in your life/internet involved/let alone your knowledge about REAL happejnings,and we are there for years on almost every night basis,mr.6.color]

[iggiv]

I want to defend Compa's posts. If he thinks roulette is not random it is his right to think.
He does not try to convince anyone that numerology is a way to go etc.

He doesn't do anything bad trying to connect a certain number with certain colour to bet. After all i am not sure it is about numerology. One may think it is about this special pocket which is marked as 27 or 15 or whatever which can be associated with this colour.

let's not create religious wars here. As Steve said in old VLS forum: one may say that u can defeat  roulette with voodoo, i don't mind as long as he is not insulting anyone.

[iggiv]

oh, not again. people, let's not blame each other, let's not start attacking each other.
everyone has a right for a point of view.

I don't understand people which are upset when someone says something against their roulette methods. It is not personal insult, it is just a way to play roulette.

For example i personally find table based methods not working well. But i have friends here which prefer just them. And they know my opinion about it, they may try to convince me i am wrong, i think they are wrong, but it is NOT getting us into any sort of fights.

I know some people which think all the roulette systems are wrong and can not work, only AP methods can work, nevertheless we get along fine with each other.

why to make it all personal? it is about ROULETTE for God's sake. it is not about people, not about religious wars.

[Lulloz]

Hey WannaWin, take i easy.. you have your opinion and Compa too.. forum = debate and everything can be discussed.

Why you have to tell to all the members what is right to read or not ?

I repeat with my very poor English , take i easy WW